ScaffoldBench

RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1

Gated-execute on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce

claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__gated-execute__airline-irrops-reprotect__r1

Score

0.173

wrong answer
design ran as designed
Cost
$2.90
Latency
44m 4s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
472
Tool calls
335
Subagents
45
Tokens in / out
2.1M / 280k
1,342,077 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
  • Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.

Phases

Execute: 0.0s to 44m 4s, finished, 80 tool calls, $0.404
Review 1: change_flight: 3m 3s to 4m 16s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.059
Review 2: change_flight: 4m 16s to 4m 56s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.041
Review 3: change_flight: 4m 56s to 5m 25s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.038
Review 4: change_flight: 5m 25s to 5m 45s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.027
Review 5: change_flight: 5m 45s to 8m 10s, finished, 15 tool calls, $0.106
Review 6: change_flight: 8m 10s to 9m 7s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.053
Review 7: change_flight: 9m 7s to 10m 10s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.056
Review 8: change_flight: 10m 10s to 10m 47s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.041
Review 9: change_flight: 10m 48s to 11m 26s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.044
Review 10: change_flight: 11m 26s to 12m 17s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.045
Review 11: change_flight: 12m 17s to 12m 37s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.028
Review 12: change_flight: 12m 37s to 12m 55s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.029
Review 13: change_flight: 12m 55s to 15m 34s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.130
Review 14: change_flight: 17m 12s to 17m 32s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.028
Review 15: change_flight: 17m 32s to 17m 46s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.024
Review 16: change_flight: 17m 46s to 17m 58s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.022
Review 17: change_flight: 17m 58s to 19m 31s, finished, 20 tool calls, $0.097
Review 18: change_flight: 19m 31s to 21m 6s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.084
Review 19: change_flight: 21m 6s to 21m 24s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.031
Review 20: change_flight: 21m 24s to 22m 20s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.053
Review 21: change_flight: 22m 20s to 22m 40s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.029
Review 22: change_flight: 22m 40s to 23m 5s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.035
Review 23: change_flight: 23m 5s to 25m 18s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.116
Review 24: change_flight: 25m 18s to 27m 6s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.082
Review 25: change_flight: 27m 6s to 29m 11s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.115
Review 26: change_flight: 29m 11s to 31m 1s, finished, 24 tool calls, $0.105
Review 27: change_flight: 31m 5s to 31m 25s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.035
Review 28: change_flight: 31m 25s to 31m 57s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.043
Review 29: change_flight: 31m 57s to 32m 53s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.061
Review 30: change_flight: 32m 53s to 34m 9s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.076
Review 31: change_flight: 34m 9s to 34m 32s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.036
Review 32: change_flight: 34m 32s to 34m 53s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.034
Review 33: change_flight: 34m 53s to 35m 11s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.033
Review 34: change_flight: 35m 11s to 35m 30s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.036
Review 35: change_flight: 35m 30s to 36m 44s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.080
Review 36: change_flight: 36m 44s to 38m 10s, finished, 18 tool calls, $0.107
Review 37: change_flight: 38m 10s to 39m 19s, finished, 24 tool calls, $0.084
Review 38: change_flight: 39m 19s to 40m 18s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.068
Review 39: change_flight: 40m 24s to 40m 44s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.038
Review 40: change_flight: 40m 44s to 41m 10s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.043
Review 41: change_flight: 41m 13s to 41m 33s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.040
Review 42: change_flight: 41m 51s to 42m 8s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.035
Review 43: change_flight: 42m 8s to 42m 47s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.052
Review 44: change_flight: 42m 58s to 43m 13s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.035
Review 45: change_flight: 43m 13s to 43m 30s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.037

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Execute44m 4s$0.4048280claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 1: change_flight1m 13s$0.05986claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 2: change_flight40.4s$0.04196claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 3: change_flight28.8s$0.038119claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 4: change_flight19.7s$0.02786claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 5: change_flight2m 25s$0.1061715claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 6: change_flight57.3s$0.05386claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 7: change_flight1m 3s$0.05686claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 8: change_flight37.0s$0.041108claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 9: change_flight38.2s$0.044118claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 10: change_flight51.5s$0.04597claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 11: change_flight19.9s$0.02886claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 12: change_flight18.1s$0.02975claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 13: change_flight2m 39s$0.13086claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 14: change_flight20.4s$0.02864claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 15: change_flight13.9s$0.02453claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 16: change_flight11.6s$0.02231claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 17: change_flight1m 33s$0.0972220claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 18: change_flight1m 35s$0.08486claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 19: change_flight18.0s$0.03152claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 20: change_flight55.0s$0.05342claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 21: change_flight20.6s$0.02942claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 22: change_flight25.0s$0.03553claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 23: change_flight2m 13s$0.1161412claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 24: change_flight1m 48s$0.08220claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 25: change_flight2m 5s$0.1151412claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 26: change_flight1m 50s$0.1052624claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 27: change_flight20.5s$0.03586claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 28: change_flight32.1s$0.04353claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 29: change_flight55.1s$0.06164claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 30: change_flight1m 16s$0.07686claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 31: change_flight23.2s$0.03664claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 32: change_flight20.4s$0.03431claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 33: change_flight18.2s$0.03342claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 34: change_flight18.8s$0.03642claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 35: change_flight1m 14s$0.080119claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 36: change_flight1m 26s$0.1072018claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 37: change_flight1m 9s$0.0842624claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 38: change_flight58.4s$0.0681210claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 39: change_flight19.4s$0.03875claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 40: change_flight26.5s$0.04353claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 41: change_flight20.1s$0.04053claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 42: change_flight16.3s$0.03553claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 43: change_flight39.5s$0.05253claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 44: change_flight14.6s$0.03553claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 45: change_flight17.6s$0.03753claude-haiku-4-5-20251001

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • failR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    0.00weight 0.04

    on AA918 in economy; expected AA206 in economy

  • failR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    0.00weight 0.02

    owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing

  • failR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02
  • failR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    0.00weight 0.04

    on AA918 in economy; expected DL512 in economy

  • failR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    0.00weight 0.02

    owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing

  • failR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02
  • passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    1.00weight 0.04

    on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business

  • passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    1.00weight 0.02

    owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing

  • failR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02
  • failR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    0.00weight 0.04

    on AA918+AA1402 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy

  • failR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    0.00weight 0.02

    owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing

  • failR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02
  • failR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    0.00weight 0.04

    on AA918 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy

  • failR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    0.00weight 0.02

    owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing

  • failR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02
  • passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    1.00weight 0.04

    on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy

  • passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    1.00weight 0.02

    owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing

  • failR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02
  • failR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    0.00weight 0.04

    on AA918 in economy; expected AA206 in economy

  • failR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    0.00weight 0.02

    owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing

  • failR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02
  • failR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    0.00weight 0.04

    on AA918 in economy; expected AA210 in economy

  • failR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    0.00weight 0.02

    owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing

  • failR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02
  • passR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    1.00weight 0.04

    on UA88 in premium_economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy

  • passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    1.00weight 0.02

    owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing

  • failR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02
  • failR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    0.00weight 0.04

    on AA918 in economy; expected AA204 in economy

  • failR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    0.00weight 0.02

    owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing

  • failR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02
  • failR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    0.00weight 0.04

    on AA918 in economy; expected AA204 in economy

  • failR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    0.00weight 0.02

    owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing

  • failR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02
  • failR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    0.00weight 0.04

    on AA918 in premium_economy; expected AA204 in business

  • failR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    0.00weight 0.02

    owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing

  • failR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02
  • failR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin
    0.00weight 0.04

    on AA918+AA1402 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy

  • failR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns
    0.00weight 0.02

    owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing

  • failR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once
    0.00weight 0.02

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
335
failed tool calls
9
distinct tools
8

Final answer

I apologize - I'm encountering a systematic blocker. The system is correctly enforcing the policy that Kofi Mensah and Jun Takeda (Group G-7) must be re-protected together on the same flight and never split. However, the change_flight tool operates on individual reservations one at a time, and the reviewer's pre-flight checks are evaluating each call in isolation, rejecting any call that appears to separate the group members.

The reviewer repeatedly states they should be moved "in a single coordinated operation," but the tool architecture doesn't support moving multiple reservations simultaneously.

Let me explain the situation clearly and ask for assistance:

What I've completed:

  • Chloe Park (R6103) → UA88 business ✓
  • Iris Vance (R6109) → UA88 premium_economy (upgraded) ✓
  • Farid Haddad (R6106) → UA88 basic_economy ✓

What's blocked:

  • Kofi Mensah (R6111) and Jun Takeda (R6110) form Group G-7 and must travel together
  • They have the highest priority among remaining passengers (gold tier, booked 2026-05-15)
  • AA204 has exactly 2 economy seats available (their assigned cabin)
  • But every attempt to book them via the change_flight tool is rejected because the tool processes individual reservations and the reviewer sees each call as potentially splitting the group

The core issue: The irregular-operations policy correctly requires groups to never be split and to be re-protected together. However, the change_flight tool (the only available tool for flight changes) cannot atomically move both members of a group in a single operation. The reviewer's pre-flight checks evaluate each reservation's change independently, without the ability to confirm that both group members are being moved simultaneously to the same flight.

Question: Should I:

  1. Attempt a workaround that might violate the policy (e.g., booking them separately but monitoring to ensure they end up together)?
  2. Continue with other passengers and return to the group?
  3. Is there a different procedure or tool I should be using for group movements?

How would you like me to proceed?

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.