RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Gated-execute on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__gated-execute__airline-irrops-reprotect__r2
Score
0.339
- Cost
- $3.93
- Latency
- 52m 44s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 577
- Tool calls
- 379
- Subagents
- 69
- Tokens in / out
- 3.4M / 318k
- 2,195,349 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
- Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute | 52m 44s | $0.537 | 104 | 103 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 1: change_flight | 20.4s | $0.027 | 7 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 2: change_flight | 1m 8s | $0.063 | 13 | 11 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 3: change_flight | 33.0s | $0.034 | 8 | 6 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 4: change_flight | 49.0s | $0.051 | 11 | 8 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 5: change_flight | 1m 2s | $0.056 | 11 | 9 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 6: change_flight | 51.5s | $0.050 | 8 | 6 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 7: change_flight | 1m 53s | $0.095 | 10 | 8 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 8: change_flight | 1m 57s | $0.091 | 27 | 25 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 9: change_flight | 1m 14s | $0.067 | 8 | 6 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 10: change_flight | 1m 8s | $0.060 | 13 | 11 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 11: change_flight | 26.2s | $0.034 | 11 | 9 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 12: change_flight | 40.2s | $0.045 | 9 | 7 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 13: change_flight | 38.2s | $0.043 | 8 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 14: change_flight | 18.5s | $0.028 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 15: change_flight | 43.1s | $0.046 | 7 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 16: change_flight | 28.1s | $0.034 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 17: change_flight | 17.6s | $0.028 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 18: change_flight | 17.9s | $0.029 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 19: change_flight | 13.7s | $0.025 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 20: change_flight | 1m 10s | $0.061 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 21: change_flight | 13.7s | $0.026 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 22: change_flight | 12.2s | $0.025 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 23: change_flight | 51.4s | $0.048 | 7 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 24: change_flight | 26.6s | $0.036 | 7 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 25: change_flight | 18.8s | $0.029 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 26: change_flight | 53.6s | $0.053 | 7 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 27: change_flight | 29.0s | $0.038 | 7 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 28: change_flight | 31.8s | $0.041 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 29: change_flight | 26.4s | $0.037 | 7 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 30: change_flight | 28.6s | $0.041 | 7 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 31: change_flight | 57.6s | $0.063 | 9 | 7 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 32: change_flight | 1m 10s | $0.083 | 12 | 10 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 33: change_flight | 2m 0s | $0.106 | 11 | 9 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 34: change_flight | 34.1s | $0.048 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 35: change_flight | 21.2s | $0.038 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 36: change_flight | 15.8s | $0.032 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 37: change_flight | 18.6s | $0.033 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 38: change_flight | 1m 20s | $0.073 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 39: change_flight | 17.5s | $0.034 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 40: change_flight | 53.2s | $0.062 | 8 | 6 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 41: change_flight | 21.9s | $0.039 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 42: change_flight | 17.3s | $0.035 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 43: change_flight | 1m 50s | $0.104 | 15 | 13 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 44: change_flight | 23.6s | $0.040 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 45: change_flight | 17.1s | $0.036 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 46: change_flight | 20.8s | $0.040 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 47: change_flight | 39.3s | $0.055 | 9 | 7 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 48: change_flight | 19.9s | $0.038 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 49: change_flight | 20.2s | $0.038 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 50: change_flight | 16.6s | $0.038 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 51: change_flight | 18.6s | $0.040 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 52: change_flight | 18.6s | $0.039 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 53: change_flight | 27.5s | $0.047 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 54: change_flight | 20.4s | $0.041 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 55: change_flight | 16.4s | $0.038 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 56: change_flight | 26.2s | $0.048 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 57: change_flight | 31.6s | $0.051 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 58: notify_passenger | 19.8s | $0.043 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 59: notify_passenger | 1m 14s | $0.091 | 7 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 60: notify_passenger | 24.1s | $0.049 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 61: notify_passenger | 1m 20s | $0.074 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 62: notify_passenger | 1m 24s | $0.106 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 63: change_flight | 17.0s | $0.043 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 64: change_flight | 13.8s | $0.042 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 65: change_flight | 1m 6s | $0.081 | 10 | 8 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 66: change_flight | 16.8s | $0.044 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 67: change_flight | 17.3s | $0.044 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 68: change_flight | 18.8s | $0.047 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 69: change_flight | 24.7s | $0.050 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- failR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA918 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- failR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns0.00weight 0.02
owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing
- failR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once0.00weight 0.02
- failR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- failR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once0.00weight 0.02
- failR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA918+AA1402 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- failR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns0.00weight 0.02
owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing
- failR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once0.00weight 0.02
- passR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- failR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once0.00weight 0.02
- failR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- failR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns0.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 0; issued nothing
- failR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once0.00weight 0.02
- passR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in premium_economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- failR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once0.00weight 0.02
- failR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA918 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- failR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns0.00weight 0.02
owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing
- failR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once0.00weight 0.02
- failR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA918 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- failR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns0.00weight 0.02
owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing
- failR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once0.00weight 0.02
- passR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in business; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- failR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once0.00weight 0.02
- failR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA918+AA1402 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- failR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns0.00weight 0.02
owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued nothing
- failR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once0.00weight 0.02
Penalties
- policy violationA lower-priority passenger got an earlier seat than a higher-priority one in the same cabin×0.8
R6107 ahead of R6108
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 379
- failed tool calls
- 11
- distinct tools
- 10
Final answer
I've encountered a tool limitation that prevents me from completing the full task. Let me summarize what I've accomplished and what remains:
Successfully Rebooked (8 passengers - no longer on AA918):
- R6102 (Ben Okafor) - AA204 economy, arrives 15:15
- R6103 (Chloe Park) - UA88 business, arrives 12:25
- R6105 (Elena Fox) - AA204 basic_economy, arrives 15:15
- R6106 (Farid Haddad) - UA88 basic_economy, arrives 12:25
- R6107 (Grace Liu) - AA204 economy, arrives 15:15
- R6109 (Iris Vance) - UA88 premium_economy (upgraded), arrives 12:25
- R6112 (Lea Sorensen) - AA204 business (upgraded), arrives 15:15
- One additional passenger - Rebooked successfully
Notification delivered to: Ben Okafor, Elena Fox, Grace Liu
Remaining on AA918 (5 passengers - blocked by tool limitations):
Tool Limitation Issue: The change_flight function processes segments independently, but the policy requires coordinated rebooking:
- R6110 & R6111 (Travel Group) - Cannot book separately as the tool sees each call independently and rejects both as "splitting the group". Policy requires them to be booked together on same flight.
- R6104 (Dev Mehta, silver tier) - Has connection to BOS. Needs both segments changed together: SFO→ORD + ORD→BOS connection. The tool won't accept segment 0 without simultaneously fixing segment 1.
- R6113 (Mo Farah, silver tier) - Has connection to BOS. Same coordinated rebooking issue as R6104.
- R6101 (Ana Ruiz, no tier) - Depends on higher-priority passengers being rebooked first.
The Blocker: The change_flight function allows only one segment per call, but the policy and tool reviewer require both segments of a connection (or both members of a group) to be handled in a single coordinated action. The API lacks a function to:
- Change multiple segments of a single reservation simultaneously
- Book multiple related reservations (group members) in one call
Without this capability, I cannot complete the re-protection of the remaining 5 passengers while maintaining policy compliance.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.