ScaffoldBench

RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2

Gated-execute on Rebook onto the earliest available flight and settle the difference

claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__gated-execute__airline-medium__r2

Score

1.000

passed
design ran as designed
Cost
$0.088
Latency
1m 9s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
20
Tool calls
15
Subagents
2
Tokens in / out
64k / 6.7k
31,740 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
  • Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.

Phases

Execute: 0.0s to 1m 9s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.029
Review 1: change_flight: 13.6s to 34.6s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.024
Review 2: charge_fee: 34.6s to 1m 4s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.034

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Execute1m 9s$0.02976claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 1: change_flight21.0s$0.02464claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 2: charge_fee29.4s$0.03475claude-haiku-4-5-20251001

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks airline-medium --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passReservation moved to the earliest flight with an available seat, same cabin
    1.00weight 0.43

    booked on AA204, expected AA204

  • passExactly one fee, the fare difference for the flight actually booked
    1.00weight 0.43

    fare difference owed on the booked flight: 8000 cents

  • passExactly one economy seat moved from the old flight to the new one
    1.00weight 0.14

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
15
failed tool calls
0
distinct tools
8

Final answer

Perfect! I've successfully completed the task. Here's what I did:

Summary:

  • Moved Dana Whitfield from AA210 (departing 17:40) to AA204 (departing 09:05) on 2026-08-03 — the earliest flight that day with available economy seats
  • Cabin unchanged: Economy (as booked)
  • Charged: $80.00 fare difference (AA204 economy fare is $390 vs. her original $310)
  • Change fee waived: Dana's gold tier frequent flyer status exempts her from the $75 change fee

Dana is now booked on the earliest available departure in her cabin and has been charged only for the fare difference, with no change fee applied due to her gold tier status.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.