ScaffoldBench

RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1

Gated-execute on Settle change requests under dated bulletins

claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__gated-execute__airline-waiver-desk__r1

Score

0.000

wrong answer
design ran as designed
Cost
$0.395
Latency
5m 47s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
120
Tool calls
92
Subagents
9
Tokens in / out
417k / 33k
308,673 read from cache
Attempts
2
retried after API errors

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
  • Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.

Phases

Execute: 0.0s to 5m 47s, finished, 52 tool calls, $0.131
Review 1: change_flight: 1m 51s to 2m 28s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.037
Review 2: change_flight: 2m 28s to 2m 54s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.030
Review 3: change_flight: 2m 54s to 3m 14s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.026
Review 4: change_flight: 3m 14s to 3m 34s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.028
Review 5: change_flight: 3m 34s to 3m 57s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.028
Review 6: change_flight: 3m 57s to 4m 15s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.026
Review 7: change_flight: 4m 15s to 4m 38s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.029
Review 8: change_flight: 4m 38s to 5m 5s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.033
Review 9: change_flight: 5m 5s to 5m 24s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.027

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Execute5m 47s$0.1315352claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 1: change_flight36.8s$0.03786claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 2: change_flight25.4s$0.03097claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 3: change_flight20.5s$0.02686claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 4: change_flight20.4s$0.02875claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 5: change_flight22.3s$0.02875claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 6: change_flight18.4s$0.02664claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 7: change_flight22.5s$0.02986claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 8: change_flight27.8s$0.03375claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 9: change_flight18.6s$0.02775claude-haiku-4-5-20251001

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks airline-waiver-desk --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • failR5201: DL542 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5201 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-301 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01
  • failR5202: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5202 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3500; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-302 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01
  • failR5203: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5203 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 15000, fare_difference 2500; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-303 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01
  • failR5204: UA90 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5204 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 3500; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-304 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01
  • failR5205: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5205 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 1000; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-305 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01
  • failR5207: AA218 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5207 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-307 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01
  • failR5208: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5208 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-308 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01
  • failR5209: AA1406 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5209 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-309 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01
  • failR5210: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5210 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3000; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-310 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01
  • failR5211: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5211 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-311 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01
  • failR5212: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5212 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-312 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
92
failed tool calls
5
distinct tools
9

Final answer

I've encountered a critical issue that prevents me from completing this task as requested.

The Problem:
All the open flight-change requests in the service queue are dated 2026-07-27 and are requesting changes to flights in August 2026 (August 3-10). Today's date is 2026-10-02, meaning all the proposed flights have already departed 55-66 days ago.

The reviewer system is correctly preventing me from booking passengers onto flights that have already past. This is a fundamental operational constraint - I cannot change a reservation to a flight that already departed.

What the requests are asking for:

  • Ines: Move to flight on 08-06
  • Jonah: Move to flight on 08-07
  • Kim Seo: Move to flight on 08-07
  • Lena: Move to flight on 08-09
  • Max: Move to flight on 08-08
  • Oscar: Move to flight on 08-08
  • Petra: Move to flight on 08-05
  • Quinn: Move to flight on 08-03
  • Ravi: Move to flight on 08-08

Why this is impossible:
These are stale requests - they were submitted on July 27 for August travel, but it's now October 2. Either:

  1. The customers already took their original flights and these requests were never processed, or
  2. The customers never travelled and cancelled at some point

Either way, rebooking them to August flights that departed months ago is operationally impossible.

What should happen:
These customers need to be contacted to determine their current travel intentions and rebooked to future dates if they still need to travel. However, I cannot complete the original task as stated because the flights no longer exist as viable options.

I cannot proceed with this task due to this fundamental constraint. The requests are too stale to fulfill as requested.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.