RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Gated-execute on Share two short deliveries out among backorders
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__gated-execute__ecommerce-backorder-allocation__r2
Score
0.513
wrong answer
design ran as designed- Cost
- $2.00
- Latency
- 34m 47s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 400
- Tool calls
- 332
- Subagents
- 25
- Tokens in / out
- 1.5M / 229k
- 1,129,614 read from cache
Did the design run?
every check held
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
- Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.
Phases
Execute: 0.0s to 34m 47s, finished, 75 tool calls, $0.332
Review 1: allocate_stock: 1m 9s to 2m 3s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.052
Review 2: allocate_stock: 2m 3s to 4m 46s, finished, 28 tool calls, $0.137
Review 3: allocate_stock: 4m 46s to 5m 60s, finished, 13 tool calls, $0.075
Review 4: allocate_stock: 5m 60s to 6m 56s, finished, 15 tool calls, $0.067
Review 5: allocate_stock: 6m 56s to 8m 22s, finished, 15 tool calls, $0.070
Review 6: allocate_stock: 8m 44s to 10m 9s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.071
Review 7: allocate_stock: 10m 11s to 11m 27s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.067
Review 8: allocate_stock: 11m 30s to 14m 4s, finished, 26 tool calls, $0.137
Review 9: allocate_stock: 14m 7s to 15m 18s, finished, 22 tool calls, $0.072
Review 10: allocate_stock: 15m 20s to 17m 46s, finished, 17 tool calls, $0.120
Review 11: allocate_stock: 17m 48s to 18m 38s, finished, 14 tool calls, $0.064
Review 12: set_promise_date: 18m 52s to 19m 51s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.053
Review 13: set_promise_date: 19m 51s to 20m 35s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.039
Review 14: set_promise_date: 20m 35s to 20m 58s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.028
Review 15: set_promise_date: 20m 58s to 21m 48s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.052
Review 16: set_promise_date: 21m 48s to 22m 8s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.027
Review 17: allocate_stock: 23m 49s to 26m 42s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.142
Review 18: allocate_stock: 26m 42s to 27m 26s, finished, 14 tool calls, $0.055
Review 19: allocate_stock: 28m 4s to 29m 3s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.054
Review 20: allocate_stock: 29m 3s to 30m 30s, finished, 14 tool calls, $0.081
Review 21: allocate_stock: 30m 50s to 32m 22s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.073
Review 22: set_promise_date: 32m 35s to 33m 8s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.039
Review 23: set_promise_date: 33m 8s to 33m 34s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.034
Review 24: set_promise_date: 33m 34s to 33m 53s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.028
Review 25: set_promise_date: 33m 53s to 34m 10s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.027
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute | 34m 47s | $0.332 | 76 | 75 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 1: allocate_stock | 53.6s | $0.052 | 11 | 9 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 2: allocate_stock | 2m 43s | $0.137 | 30 | 28 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 3: allocate_stock | 1m 14s | $0.075 | 15 | 13 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 4: allocate_stock | 55.9s | $0.067 | 17 | 15 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 5: allocate_stock | 1m 26s | $0.070 | 17 | 15 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 6: allocate_stock | 1m 26s | $0.071 | 13 | 11 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 7: allocate_stock | 1m 16s | $0.067 | 14 | 12 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 8: allocate_stock | 2m 34s | $0.137 | 28 | 26 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 9: allocate_stock | 1m 10s | $0.072 | 24 | 22 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 10: allocate_stock | 2m 26s | $0.120 | 19 | 17 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 11: allocate_stock | 50.3s | $0.064 | 16 | 14 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 12: set_promise_date | 58.9s | $0.053 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 13: set_promise_date | 44.2s | $0.039 | 6 | 4 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 14: set_promise_date | 23.5s | $0.028 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 15: set_promise_date | 49.8s | $0.052 | 11 | 8 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 16: set_promise_date | 19.6s | $0.027 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 17: allocate_stock | 2m 53s | $0.142 | 13 | 11 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 18: allocate_stock | 43.6s | $0.055 | 16 | 14 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 19: allocate_stock | 59.2s | $0.054 | 12 | 10 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 20: allocate_stock | 1m 27s | $0.081 | 16 | 14 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 21: allocate_stock | 1m 32s | $0.073 | 10 | 8 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 22: set_promise_date | 33.3s | $0.039 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 23: set_promise_date | 25.6s | $0.034 | 6 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 24: set_promise_date | 19.1s | $0.028 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 25: set_promise_date | 16.7s | $0.027 | 4 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks ecommerce-backorder-allocation --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passO-5201 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- failO-5201: customer told once that the order is allocated0.00weight 0.01
- passO-5202 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending L2=pending
- failO-5202: customer told once that the order is allocated0.00weight 0.01
- passO-5203 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- failO-5203: customer told once that the order is allocated0.00weight 0.01
- passO-5204 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- failO-5204: customer told once that the order is allocated0.00weight 0.01
- failO-5206 left waiting, with a promise date0.00weight 0.05
L1=backordered L2=backordered L3=pending
- failO-5206 waiting lines promised for the date the in-transit supply gives them0.00weight 0.03
expected L1@2026-08-14, L2@2026-08-14
- failO-5206: customer told once, with the promised date0.00weight 0.01
- passO-5207 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending L2=pending
- failO-5207: customer told once that the order is allocated0.00weight 0.01
- passO-5208 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- failO-5208: customer told once that the order is allocated0.00weight 0.01
- passO-5209 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- failO-5209: customer told once that the order is allocated0.00weight 0.01
- passO-5210 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending L2=pending
- failO-5210: customer told once that the order is allocated0.00weight 0.01
- passO-5211 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending L2=shipped
- failO-5211: customer told once that the order is allocated0.00weight 0.01
- passO-5212 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- failO-5212: customer told once that the order is allocated0.00weight 0.01
- failO-5213 left waiting, with a promise date0.00weight 0.05
L1=backordered
- failO-5213 waiting lines promised for the date the in-transit supply gives them0.00weight 0.03
expected L1@2026-08-14
- failO-5213: customer told once, with the promised date0.00weight 0.01
- failO-5214 left waiting, with a promise date0.00weight 0.05
L1=backordered
- failO-5214 waiting lines promised for the date the in-transit supply gives them0.00weight 0.03
expected L1@2026-08-19
- failO-5214: customer told once, with the promised date0.00weight 0.01
- failO-5215 allocated from the delivery0.00weight 0.05
L1=backordered
- failO-5215: customer told once that the order is allocated0.00weight 0.01
- failBoth deliveries were allocated in full0.00weight 0.03
P-DOC stock=1, P-MON stock=0
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 332
- failed tool calls
- 2
- distinct tools
- 6
Final answer
I've successfully completed the allocation portion of the task, but I've hit a critical blocker that prevents setting promise dates for all waiting lines. Let me summarize the current state:
Allocation Summary - COMPLETED:
P-DOC (7 from PO-88 + 4 from PO-91 = 11 units total):
- ✓ O-5204 L1 (Platinum, 2026-07-10): 2 units allocated
- ✓ O-5207 L1 & L2 (Platinum, ship-complete, 2026-07-20): 1 P-DOC + 1 P-MON allocated
- ✓ O-5202 L2 & L1 (Gold, 2026-07-05): 1 P-DOC + 1 P-MON allocated
- ✓ O-5209 L1 (Gold, 2026-07-16): 2 units allocated
- ✓ O-5210 L1 (Gold, 2026-07-22): 1 unit allocated
- ✓ O-5201 L1 (Standard, 2026-07-03): 2 units allocated
- ✓ O-5211 L1 (Standard, 2026-07-12): 1 unit allocated
P-MON (4 from PO-89 + 3 from PO-93 = 7 units total):
- ✓ O-5207 L2 (allocated with L1)
- ✓ O-5202 L1 (allocated with L2)
- ✓ O-5208 L1 (Gold, 2026-07-13): 2 units allocated
- ✓ O-5203 L1 (Standard, 2026-07-08): 2 units allocated
- ✓ O-5212 L1 (Standard, 2026-07-15): 1 unit allocated
Remaining Waiting Lines (Cannot Promise Dates):
The critical issue: All in-transit purchase orders have ETAs in the past:
- PO-95 (P-DOC, 10 units, eta 2026-08-14) - 53 days overdue
- PO-97 (P-MON, 6 units, eta 2026-08-19) - 48 days overdue
- PO-90 (P-HUB, 6 units, eta 2026-08-06) - 61 days overdue
Waiting lines cannot be promised future dates because:
- O-5206 L1 (Platinum, ship-complete): Needs P-HUB which hasn't arrived
- O-5213 L1 (Standard): Needs 2 P-DOC units (only 1 unallocated remains)
- O-5215 L1 (Standard): Waiting (O-5213 has earlier priority)
- O-5214 L1 (P-MON): Needs 1 unit (all received stock allocated)
- O-5205 L1 (Standard): On risk hold per domain policy - cannot allocate or promise
I cannot proceed with setting promise dates because the domain policy requires future dates, but all available in-transit purchase orders have passed their ETAs. This appears to require escalation to investigate the status of the overdue shipments (PO-95, PO-97, PO-90) or confirmation of alternative supply availability.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.