ScaffoldBench

RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1

Gated-execute on Redirect the order that has not shipped

claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__gated-execute__ecommerce-easy__r1

Score

1.000

passed
design ran as designed
Cost
$0.038
Latency
23.2s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
9
Tool calls
6
Subagents
1
Tokens in / out
25k / 2.4k
4,426 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
  • Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.

Phases

Execute: 0.0s to 23.2s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.025
Review 1: update_shipping_address: 8.5s to 19.6s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.013

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Execute23.2s$0.02554claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 1: update_shipping_address11.1s$0.01342claude-haiku-4-5-20251001

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks ecommerce-easy --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passThe order that has not shipped carries the new address
    1.00weight 0.43

    O-1001 address: 7 Quarry Rise, Sheffield S11 8XZ, UK

  • passThe edit did not spill onto the order already in transit
    1.00weight 0.29
  • passLooked up which order was still open before editing one
    1.00weight 0.14
  • passChecked the state of the order already in transit
    1.00weight 0.14

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
6
failed tool calls
0
distinct tools
4

Final answer

Task completed successfully!

Here's what I did:

  1. Retrieved Dana Whitfield's orders: Found that customer C-100 has two orders: O-1001 and O-1002

  2. Identified the order statuses:

    • O-1001: Status = pending (has NOT shipped yet)
    • O-1002: Status = shipped (already in transit)
  3. Updated the pending order: Changed the shipping address on O-1001 from "12 Alder Lane, Bristol BS1 4TR, UK" to "7 Quarry Rise, Sheffield S11 8XZ, UK"
  4. Confirmed the in-transit order was not affected: O-1002 remains unchanged with its original address (88 Old Mill Road, Bristol BS3 2QQ, UK), per the domain policy that prohibits changing addresses on shipped orders

Dana's new address is now set for her pending order, and her order already in transit will not be disrupted.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.