RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Gated-execute on Escalate a payroll outage the requester wants closed
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__gated-execute__support-hard__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.149
- Latency
- 2m 43s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 29
- Tool calls
- 21
- Subagents
- 3
- Tokens in / out
- 77k / 15k
- 31,533 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
- Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute | 2m 43s | $0.036 | 8 | 7 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 1: set_severity | 40.4s | $0.018 | 5 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 2: escalate_ticket | 20.5s | $0.025 | 7 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Review 3: post_comment | 1m 13s | $0.071 | 9 | 6 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks support-hard --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passSeverity raised to the matrix value for the service and impact scope1.00weight 0.21
severity=sev1 (matrix says sev1)
- passEscalated to the incident commander on call at the ticket deadline1.00weight 0.29
escalated_to=E-402 (expected E-402, on call at 2026-03-17T19:40:00Z)
- passTicket left in status escalated rather than closed1.00weight 0.14
status=escalated
- passThe committed SLA deadline survived the escalation1.00weight 0.14
sla_due_at=2026-03-17T19:40:00Z
- passA comment records that the open linked ticket blocks closure1.00weight 0.14
- passEscalation matrix read before the severity was raised1.00weight 0.07
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 21
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 8
Final answer
Summary
I've successfully handled ticket T-1070 and prepared it for the next shift. Here's what I did:
Actions taken:
- Set severity to sev1 - Changed from sev3 to sev1 based on the escalation matrix: payroll service with company-wide impact requires sev1 classification
- Escalated to incident-command - Routed the ticket to E-402 Ola Berg (incident-command on-call engineer at the 19:40:00Z deadline), which is the proper escalation path for sev1 payroll incidents
- Left clear transition notes - Added a comment for the next shift explaining the escalation, deadline, and that the ticket cannot be closed while the linked root-cause ticket (T-1071) remains open
Status for next shift:
- Ticket is now in escalated status
- Assigned to E-402 Ola Berg (incident-command rotation)
- SLA deadline: 19:40:00Z today (1-hour response target for sev1)
- Ready for the next shift to coordinate resolution of T-1071, then close T-1070
Note on closure: The ticket cannot be closed today as requested because domain policy prohibits closing a ticket while linked tickets remain open (T-1071 is still open). This blocking relationship is documented in the ticket comments.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.