ScaffoldBench

RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2

Gated-execute on Consolidate duplicate CRM reports

claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__gated-execute__support-medium__r2

Score

0.308

wrong answer
design ran as designed
Cost
$1.25
Latency
21m 50s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
189
Tool calls
113
Subagents
25
Tokens in / out
982k / 127k
649,499 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
  • Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.

Phases

Execute: 0.0s to 21m 50s, finished, 42 tool calls, $0.217
Review 1: merge_tickets: 31.2s to 52.0s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.027
Review 2: merge_tickets: 55.3s to 2m 0s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.057
Review 3: merge_tickets: 2m 4s to 2m 36s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.030
Review 4: merge_tickets: 2m 44s to 3m 8s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.031
Review 5: set_severity: 3m 12s to 4m 47s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.085
Review 6: assign_ticket: 4m 47s to 5m 21s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.036
Review 7: post_comment: 5m 21s to 6m 10s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.043
Review 8: set_severity: 6m 20s to 6m 55s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.034
Review 9: set_severity: 6m 58s to 7m 19s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.026
Review 10: assign_ticket: 7m 19s to 7m 49s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.031
Review 11: assign_ticket: 7m 58s to 8m 19s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.029
Review 12: set_severity: 8m 21s to 9m 43s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.059
Review 13: post_comment: 9m 58s to 10m 23s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.027
Review 14: set_severity: 10m 23s to 11m 13s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.049
Review 15: assign_ticket: 11m 13s to 11m 43s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.035
Review 16: escalate_ticket: 12m 10s to 13m 4s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.054
Review 17: set_severity: 13m 20s to 14m 9s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.049
Review 18: assign_ticket: 14m 9s to 14m 25s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.024
Review 19: set_severity: 14m 30s to 15m 37s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.059
Review 20: set_severity: 15m 55s to 16m 41s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.042
Review 21: assign_ticket: 16m 49s to 17m 23s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.033
Review 22: post_comment: 17m 37s to 18m 6s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.036
Review 23: set_severity: 18m 14s to 19m 1s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.047
Review 24: assign_ticket: 19m 1s to 20m 12s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.053
Review 25: post_comment: 20m 28s to 21m 19s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.042

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Execute21m 50s$0.2174342claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 1: merge_tickets20.9s$0.02775claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 2: merge_tickets1m 5s$0.057107claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 3: merge_tickets32.4s$0.03075claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 4: merge_tickets23.8s$0.03197claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 5: set_severity1m 35s$0.08597claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 6: assign_ticket34.2s$0.03675claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 7: post_comment48.7s$0.04364claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 8: set_severity35.4s$0.03475claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 9: set_severity20.4s$0.02653claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 10: assign_ticket30.6s$0.03142claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 11: assign_ticket21.2s$0.02942claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 12: set_severity1m 22s$0.05964claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 13: post_comment24.9s$0.02731claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 14: set_severity50.4s$0.04964claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 15: assign_ticket29.5s$0.03564claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 16: escalate_ticket54.1s$0.05464claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 17: set_severity49.6s$0.04964claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 18: assign_ticket16.0s$0.02442claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 19: set_severity1m 7s$0.05964claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 20: set_severity46.0s$0.04264claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 21: assign_ticket33.3s$0.03353claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 22: post_comment29.8s$0.03641claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 23: set_severity47.0s$0.04764claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 24: assign_ticket1m 12s$0.05353claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Review 25: post_comment50.6s$0.04220claude-haiku-4-5-20251001

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks support-medium --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passSurvivor carries the earliest SLA deadline of the merged set
    1.00weight 0.23

    sla_due_at=2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (expected 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z)

  • failBoth duplicate reports were merged into the earliest-created ticket
    0.00weight 0.23

    T-1053: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052; T-1054: status=open, merged_into=-

  • failThe engineering tracking ticket now points at the survivor
    0.00weight 0.15

    T-1061 links=[T-1054]

  • failSurvivor re-graded from the matrix for its widened impact scope
    0.00weight 0.15

    severity=sev3 (matrix says sev2)

  • failSurvivor assigned to the engineer on call for the owning rotation at its deadline
    0.00weight 0.15

    assignee=unassigned (expected E-201)

  • passEvery ticket folded in was read before the merge
    1.00weight 0.08

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
113
failed tool calls
0
distinct tools
8

Final answer

Final Status Summary

I have successfully consolidated two of the three duplicate CRM search error tickets:

Consolidation Completed:

  • Survivor Ticket: T-1052 ("CRM search returns 500 error" - earliest created 2026-03-17T07:05:00Z)
  • Merged Duplicate: T-1053 ("Cannot search accounts in CRM - server error" - created 2026-03-17T08:40:00Z)
  • Merged Status Confirmed: T-1053 now shows status=merged with merged_into=T-1052
  • SLA Deadline Updated: 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (earliest deadline from the set)
  • Impact Scope: Department-wide (inherited from T-1053)

Remaining Duplicate (Cannot consolidate yet):

  • T-1054 ("CRM account search 500") reports the same underlying issue but is linked to T-1061 (engineering tracking ticket for search index rebuild), which remains open. Per domain policy, tickets with open links cannot be merged. Once T-1061 closes, T-1054 should be consolidated with T-1052.

Grading and Assignment Blocker:
T-1052 still requires:

  • Severity correction from sev3 → sev2 (per escalation matrix for department-wide CRM impact)
  • Assignment to E-201 Ines Kovac (on-call for business-apps rotation at SLA deadline)

However, the reviewer system has created a deadlock: it requires these two operations to execute together as an atomic action for the ticket to be considered "graded and assigned correctly," but the available tools only provide separate operations that are evaluated individually, each being denied for being incomplete without the other.

Separate Issues Left Alone:

  • T-1055 (CSV export producing empty file) - different underlying problem, correctly left open
  • T-1061 (search index rebuild tracking) - engineering ticket, correctly left open

The consolidation of the duplicate reports (T-1052 + T-1053) is complete. The remaining work requires either a tool that combines grading and assignment, or escalation to human operators to resolve the reviewer deadlock.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.