RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Orchestrator-workers on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__orchestrator-workers__airline-irrops-reprotect__r2
Score
0.538
- Cost
- $0.193
- Latency
- 3m 20s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 92
- Tool calls
- 88
- Subagents
- 1
- Tokens in / out
- 218k / 22k
- 181,280 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 24.1s | $0.015 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 1: all | 2m 43s | $0.167 | 89 | 88 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Synthesize | 13.4s | $0.011 | 1 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206+AA1402 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- failR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns0.00weight 0.02
owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 25500, hotel 18000; issued compensation 25500, hotel 18000
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 25500, hotel 18000; issued compensation 25500, hotel 18000
- passR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 24000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 24000, hotel 18000
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- passR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in premium_economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 28000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 28000, hotel 18000
- passR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 28000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 28000, hotel 18000
- passR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in premium_economy; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206+AA1402 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- failR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns0.00weight 0.02
owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 88
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 8
Final answer
Task Completion Assessment
Based on the worker report, the re-protection is incomplete and violates the domain policy.
What Was Done:
- All 13 passengers were re-protected onto AA206 (SFO→ORD, 2026-08-04, arriving 15:15)
- Compensation vouchers and hotel vouchers were issued to all passengers
- Passengers were notified of their new bookings
Critical Issue — Task Not Fully Complete:
Two passengers have broken connections that were NOT rebooked:
- Dev Mehta (R6104) — originally booked on connection AA1402 ORD→BOS departing 2026-08-03 at 15:30
- Mo Farah (R6113) — originally booked on the same connection
Their new arrival in ORD is 2026-08-04 at 15:15. The connection AA1402 departs the day before they arrive—it is no longer valid.
The Domain Policy requires: "When a new first leg breaks a connection, rebook the onward leg too."
The worker report states this requires "manual intervention" because no suitable onward flights were found in the system search. However, this means the task remains unfinished. These two passengers should not be told merely to "contact the airline immediately"—they should have their ORD→BOS legs rebooked to a flight departing at least 60 minutes after 15:15 on 2026-08-04, or to an alternative routing that reaches Boston soonest.
Summary: 11 of 13 passengers are fully re-protected. 2 passengers have had their first leg rebooked but their onward connections remain unbooked, in violation of policy.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.