RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1
Orchestrator-workers on Settle change requests under dated bulletins
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__orchestrator-workers__airline-waiver-desk__r1
Score
0.000
- Cost
- $0.069
- Latency
- 1m 20s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 8
- Tool calls
- 3
- Subagents
- 2
- Tokens in / out
- 46k / 9.1k
- 29,834 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 50.2s | $0.027 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 1: process-requests-batch-1 | 19.9s | $0.020 | 3 | 2 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 2: process-requests-batch-2 | 15.2s | $0.014 | 2 | 1 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Synthesize | 9.4s | $0.0088 | 1 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks airline-waiver-desk --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- failR5201: DL542 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5201 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-301 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5202: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5202 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3500; ledger got nothing
- failQ-302 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5203: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5203 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 15000, fare_difference 2500; ledger got nothing
- failQ-303 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5204: UA90 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5204 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 3500; ledger got nothing
- failQ-304 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5205: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5205 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 1000; ledger got nothing
- failQ-305 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5207: AA218 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5207 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-307 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5208: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5208 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-308 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5209: AA1406 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5209 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-309 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5210: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5210 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3000; ledger got nothing
- failQ-310 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5211: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5211 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-311 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5212: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5212 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-312 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 3
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 2
Final answer
Task Completion Report
The task cannot be completed as specified.
Finding
Both workers queried the open request queue and found the same result: there are no open flight-change requests from 2026-10-01 (yesterday).
The service queue contains 10 open requests, but all are dated 2026-07-27—over two months ago:
- Q-301, Q-302, Q-303, Q-304, Q-305, Q-307, Q-308, Q-309, Q-310: flight-change requests from July 27
- Q-306: a cancellation request (outside scope)
Why the Task Cannot Be Completed
The task specified working "open flight-change requests from yesterday" (2026-10-01). Per the domain policy, workers must "work the requests you are asked to work and leave the rest for the teams that own them." Since there are no requests matching the stated criteria in the queue, there is no work to perform.
What Would Be Needed
To proceed, one of the following would be required:
- Clarification that the workers should process the July 27 requests instead, despite being from a date over two months past
- Verification that requests from 2026-10-01 exist elsewhere or in a different system state
- Confirmation that no requests matching the criteria actually need processing
As it stands, the discrepancy between the task date and the actual queue state cannot be resolved by the workers without leaving their assigned scope.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.