RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1
Orchestrator-workers on Work a morning's customer inbox
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__orchestrator-workers__ecommerce-inbox-triage__r1
Score
0.633
- Cost
- $0.189
- Latency
- 1m 58s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 68
- Tool calls
- 62
- Subagents
- 3
- Tokens in / out
- 223k / 21k
- 183,754 read from cache
- Attempts
- 2
- retried after API errors
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 30.8s | $0.018 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 1: handle-cancellations | 48.2s | $0.051 | 22 | 21 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 2: handle-returns | 50.6s | $0.045 | 15 | 14 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 3: handle-other-messages | 1m 3s | $0.057 | 28 | 27 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Synthesize | 24.0s | $0.018 | 1 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks ecommerce-inbox-triage --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passO-6101 sent to the customer's corrected address1.00weight 0.08
22 Leith Walk, Edinburgh EH6 5DU, UK
- passBoth address messages answered1.00weight 0.02
- passO-6102 has shipped: address left alone and the customer told why1.00weight 0.04
- passO-6103 cancelled in full1.00weight 0.04
- passO-6103 refunded to the card for what was paid1.00weight 0.08
10620 card
- passO-6103's goods back in stock1.00weight 0.04
- passM-803 answered1.00weight 0.02
- passGrace Liu's store credit left where it is, and the sender answered1.00weight 0.04
- passO-6105 cable not refunded again, and the customer told it already was1.00weight 0.04
- failO-6106 sent to the customer's office0.00weight 0.08
60 Hagley Road, Birmingham B16 8PE, UK
- failThe withdrawn cancellation was not carried out, and both messages were answered0.00weight 0.04
- passThe shipping question answered and nothing else done1.00weight 0.04
- passO-6112's unshipped monitor cancelled, refunded to the card and restocked; the shipped keyboard left alone1.00weight 0.08
- passM-809 answered1.00weight 0.02
- passUnverified sender: O-6109 left alone and the sender asked to write from the account address1.00weight 0.04
- passNo refund for headphones that have not come back, and the customer told how to return them1.00weight 0.04
- failO-6101's cables cancelled, the keyboard kept0.00weight 0.04
- failO-6101's cables refunded to the card0.00weight 0.04
- failO-6101's cables back in stock0.00weight 0.04
- failM-813 answered0.00weight 0.02
- failO-6114 cancelled, refunded to the card and restocked0.00weight 0.08
- failM-814 answered0.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 62
- failed tool calls
- 2
- distinct tools
- 12
Final answer
Final Summary
Based on the three worker reports, most of today's inbox has been handled, but there are gaps and conflicts:
Completed Actions
The workers successfully handled 10 of 12 messages:
- M-801, M-804 (Lena Fischer): Shipping address updated for O-6101 ✓
- M-802 (Omar Haddad): Address change rejected (order already shipped) ✓
- M-803 (Sofia Marin): Order O-6103 cancelled, refund issued, inventory restocked ✓
- M-805 (Alex Morgan): Store credit transfer rejected (wrong email, policy violation) ✓
- M-806 (Tom Becker): Refund claim verified as already processed ✓
- M-808 (Ken Ito): Status inquiry answered ✓
- M-809 (Nadia Rahman): Order O-6112 L2 cancelled (L1 already shipped), refund issued ✓
- M-810 (Sofia Marin): Address change rejected (wrong email) ✓
- M-811 (Arjun Mehta): Return instructions provided (no warehouse receipts yet) ✓
Unfinished Work
M-807: Not mentioned by any worker. This message remains unhandled.
M-812 (Priya Nair): Worker 1 correctly identified this as NOT a cancellation, but rather a retraction requesting an address change instead. No worker reports having handled it as an address change request—it remains unaddressed.
Conflicts
M-806 was handled twice: Both Worker 2 and Worker 3 processed the same message and reached the same conclusion (refund already issued), creating redundant effort.
Recommendation: M-807 and M-812 require attention before the inbox can be considered fully cleared.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.