RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Orchestrator-workers on Settle a desk of returns by what actually came back
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__orchestrator-workers__ecommerce-returns-desk__r2
Score
0.510
- Cost
- $0.236
- Latency
- 2m 50s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 127
- Tool calls
- 122
- Subagents
- 2
- Tokens in / out
- 323k / 26k
- 276,652 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 44.7s | $0.028 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 1: settle-complete-returns | 1m 50s | $0.154 | 99 | 98 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 2: handle-incomplete-or-mis | 36.7s | $0.041 | 25 | 24 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Synthesize | 14.6s | $0.013 | 1 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks ecommerce-returns-desk --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passRMA-801: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 10965 card; got 10965 card
- passRMA-801 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-802: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 15900 card; got 13515 card
- passRMA-802 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-803: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 27965 store_credit; got 27965 store_credit
- passRMA-803 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-804: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 27965 store_credit; got 27965 store_credit
- passRMA-804 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-805: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 5520 card; got 5865 store_credit
- passRMA-805 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-806: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 7350 card; got 7350 card
- passRMA-806 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-807: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 15900 card; got no refund
- failRMA-807 left closed0.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-808: investigation opened, nothing refunded1.00weight 0.04
expected no refund; got no refund
- passRMA-808 left investigating1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-809: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 3800 card; got no refund
- failRMA-809 left open0.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-810: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 9900 card; got 9900 card
- passRMA-810 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-811: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 4900 card; got 4900 card
- passRMA-811 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-812: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 21900 card; got 21900 store_credit
- passRMA-812 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-813: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 10965 card; got 10965 store_credit
- passRMA-813 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-814: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 31800 card; got 27030 card
- passRMA-814 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-815: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 10965 card; got 10965 store_credit
- passRMA-815 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-816: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 4165 card; got no refund
- failRMA-816 left closed0.00weight 0.01
- passP-KEY returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +3 damaged +1 (expected +3 / +1)
- failP-HDP returns restocked into the right buckets0.00weight 0.02
sellable +3 damaged +0 (expected +4 / +0)
- passP-MON returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +2 damaged +0 (expected +2 / +0)
- passP-HUB returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +1 damaged +0 (expected +1 / +0)
- failP-MOU returns restocked into the right buckets0.00weight 0.02
sellable +1 damaged +2 (expected +2 / +2)
- failP-CAB returns restocked into the right buckets0.00weight 0.02
sellable +0 damaged +0 (expected +1 / +1)
- passP-DOC returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +0 damaged +1 (expected +0 / +1)
- failStore-credit balances moved by exactly the store-credit refunds owed0.00weight 0.02
C-805=5865 (expected 0), C-812=21900 (expected 0), C-813=10965 (expected 0), C-815=10965 (expected 0)
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 122
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 11
Final answer
Final Summary
The workers have substantially completed the task of settling open return authorizations. Here's what was accomplished:
Completed Settlements (12 RMAs)
12 return authorizations with all units received and matching products were fully processed:
- 6 card refunds (within 30-day window): RMA-801, 802, 806, 810, 811, 814
- 6 store credit refunds (outside 30-day window): RMA-803, 804, 805, 812, 813, 815
All were refunded (less applicable restocking fees), restocked to sellable or damaged stock based on warehouse grade, and closed per policy.
Held Pending Receipt (3 RMAs)
Three returns were correctly left open awaiting warehouse receipt:
- RMA-807: No units received yet
- RMA-809: 2 of 3 cable units received; 1 still in transit
- RMA-816: No units received yet
Investigation Opened (1 RMA)
- RMA-808: Product mismatch (customer returned monitor; warehouse received cable). Investigation opened per domain policy.
Conflict in Reports
The workers disagree on the investigation number for RMA-808:
- Worker 1 reports investigation INV-2 was opened
- Worker 2 reports investigation INV-1 was opened
This suggests either duplicate investigations were created, or one report is incorrect. The investigation itself was properly opened (correct action), but the identification number is in conflict and should be verified in the system.
All other actions align with domain policy and the returns ruleset.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.