RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Orchestrator-workers on Where ten HTTP header fields are defined
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__orchestrator-workers__research-header-fields__r2
Score
0.900
- Cost
- $0.212
- Latency
- 1m 1s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.2s
- Turns
- 45
- Tool calls
- 39
- Subagents
- 3
- Tokens in / out
- 298k / 12k
- 221,359 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 8.6s | $0.0087 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 1: caching-headers-1 | 27.0s | $0.069 | 17 | 16 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 2: caching-headers-2 | 24.5s | $0.042 | 9 | 8 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 3: misc-headers | 42.8s | $0.079 | 16 | 15 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Synthesize | 9.1s | $0.013 | 1 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks research-header-fields --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passheader field Age1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in rfc9111
- passheader field Cache-Control1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in rfc9111
- passheader field Expires1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in rfc9111
- failheader field Last-Modified0.00weight 0.10
rfc: answered "7232", expected 9110; section: answered "2.2", expected "8.8.2"; quote is from rfc7232, expected rfc9110
- passheader field ETag1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in rfc9110
- passheader field Location1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in rfc9110
- passheader field Retry-After1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in rfc9110
- passheader field Vary1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in rfc9110
- passheader field Strict-Transport-Security1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in rfc6797
- passheader field Link1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in rfc8288
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- corpus
- {"version":2,"snapshot":"2026-10-01","hash":"86bd1bd14f66db67ec5c7686f5e47663ee99f16c49edb5b9384b8668854857dc","documents":9}
- opened documents
- ["rfc9110","rfc9111","rfc6797","rfc7232","rfc8288"]
- opened by role
- {"primary":["rfc9110","rfc9111","rfc6797","rfc8288"],"superseded":["rfc7232"]}
- displayed share
- {"rfc7234":0.0213,"rfc9111":0.3141,"mdn-header-cache-control":0.0197,"rfc6797":0.1037,"mdn-header-strict-transport-security":0.0761,"rfc9110":0.0928,"rfc7231":0.0102,"rfc7232":0.2008,"rfc8288":0.2162}
- cited count
- 5
- verified count
- 5
- hallucinated count
- 0
- citation integrity
- 1
- hallucinated urls
- []
- answer block
- true
- answer block repaired
- false
- items answered
- 10
- item count
- 10
- field accuracy
- 0.9 (90%)
- grounded items
- 9
- field misses
- {"rfc":1,"section":1}
Final answer
Based on the worker reports, I have successfully gathered RFC definitions for all 10 HTTP header fields. Here is the complete summary:
Findings
The workers collectively researched all 10 header fields and identified their current RFC definitions:
- Age, Cache-Control, Expires are defined in RFC 9111 (HTTP Caching)
- Last-Modified is defined in RFC 7232 (Conditional Requests)
- ETag, Location, Retry-After, Vary are defined in RFC 9110 (HTTP Semantics)
- Strict-Transport-Security is defined in RFC 6797 (HTTP Strict Transport Security)
- Link is defined in RFC 8288 (Web Linking)
All RFCs cited are current and non-obsoleted versions.
{"answers":[{"field":"Age","rfc":"9111","section":"5.1","quote":"The \"Age\" response header field conveys the sender's estimate of the time since the response was generated or successfully validated at the origin server.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9111.html"},{"field":"Cache-Control","rfc":"9111","section":"5.2","quote":"The \"Cache-Control\" header field is used to list directives for caches along the request/response chain.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9111.html"},{"field":"Expires","rfc":"9111","section":"5.3","quote":"The \"Expires\" response header field gives the date/time after which the response is considered stale.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9111.html"},{"field":"Last-Modified","rfc":"7232","section":"2.2","quote":"The \"Last-Modified\" header field in a response provides a timestamp indicating the date and time at which the origin server believes the selected representation was last modified.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7232.html"},{"field":"ETag","rfc":"9110","section":"8.8.3","quote":"The \"ETag\" field in a response provides the current entity tag for the selected representation, as determined at the conclusion of handling the request.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html"},{"field":"Location","rfc":"9110","section":"10.2.2","quote":"The \"Location\" header field is used in some responses to refer to a specific resource in relation to the response.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html"},{"field":"Retry-After","rfc":"9110","section":"10.2.3","quote":"Servers send the \"Retry-After\" header field to indicate how long the user agent ought to wait before making a follow-up request.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html"},{"field":"Vary","rfc":"9110","section":"12.5.5","quote":"The \"Vary\" header field in a response describes what parts of a request message, aside from the method and target URI, might have influenced the origin server's process for selecting the content of this response.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html"},{"field":"Strict-Transport-Security","rfc":"6797","section":"6.1","quote":"The Strict-Transport-Security HTTP response header field (STS header field) indicates to a UA that it MUST enforce the HSTS Policy in regards to the host emitting the response message containing this header field.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797.html"},{"field":"Link","rfc":"8288","section":"3","quote":"The Link header field provides a means for serialising one or more links into HTTP headers.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8288.html"}]}Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.