ScaffoldBench

RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2

Orchestrator-workers on OWASP vs NIST on password hashing

claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__orchestrator-workers__research-password-hashing__r2

Score

0.813

wrong answer
design ran as designed
Cost
$0.265
+ $0.061 judging
Latency
2m 43s
setup 0.0s, grading 4.9s
Turns
42
Tool calls
38
Subagents
1
Tokens in / out
762k / 17k
700,195 read from cache
Attempts
2
retried after API errors

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • Judge answered: heldharness.judgeAt least one grading call returned a usable verdict.
  • The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
  • The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
  • The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.

Phases

Decompose: 0.0s to 58.1s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.037
Worker 1: all: 58.1s to 2m 29s, finished, 38 tool calls, $0.212
Synthesize: 2m 29s to 2m 43s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.016

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Decompose58.1s$0.03720claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Worker 1: all1m 31s$0.2123938claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Synthesize14.4s$0.01610claude-haiku-4-5-20251001

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks research-password-hashing --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passStates that OWASP recommends Argon2id first, with a minimum configuration of 19 MiB of memory, an iteration count of 2 and 1 degree of parallelism.
    1.00weight 0.19

    met, backed by verified evidence E1. “OWASP recommends **Argon2id** as the primary algorithm, configured with a minimum of 19 MiB of memory, an iteration count of 2, and 1 degree of parallelism.”

  • passStates OWASP's alternatives as conditions: scrypt if Argon2id is not available, bcrypt only for legacy systems, and PBKDF2 (at least 600,000 iterations with HMAC-SHA-256) if FIPS-140 compliance is required.
    1.00weight 0.13

    met, backed by verified evidence E2. “Scrypt is recommended as a fallback if Argon2id is unavailable, and bcrypt only for legacy systems.”

  • passStates that the current NIST SP 800-63B (revision 4) requires passwords to be salted and hashed with a suitable password hashing scheme that takes a cost factor, and says an approved scheme from the latest revision of SP 800-132 (or updated NIST guidelines) SHOULD be used.
    1.00weight 0.19

    met, backed by verified evidence E3, E5. “NIST mandates that passwords "SHALL be salted and hashed using a suitable password hashing scheme,"”

  • failStates that the superseded revision 3 named PBKDF2 and Balloon as example key derivation functions and said a memory-hard function SHOULD be used, and that revision 4 no longer contains that wording.
    0.00weight 0.13

    Not stated.

  • passExplains that for this team the two do not actually conflict: OWASP's own guidance is to use PBKDF2 (HMAC-SHA-256, at least 600,000 iterations) when FIPS-140 compliance is required, and NIST permits PBKDF2, so PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-256 satisfies both; Argon2id remains OWASP's choice only where FIPS does not apply.
    1.00weight 0.25

    met, backed by verified evidence E2, E7. “If FIPS compliance is required, implement PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-256 with 600,000 iterations or more.”

  • partialStates at least one requirement both sources share, such as a unique salt for every password or a deliberately expensive hash with a tunable cost (work) factor instead of a fast general-purpose hash.
    0.50weight 0.13

    partial, backed by verified evidence E5. “with the cost factor "SHOULD be as high as practical without negatively impacting verifier performance."”

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

corpus
{"version":2,"snapshot":"2026-10-01","hash":"e12dc326c69a32d91f85f6355dc63e2a7d672b605685a1ffa1582a42bb1c561e","documents":5}
opened documents
["owasp-password-storage","nist-sp800-63b-4","nist-sp800-63b-3","rfc9106"]
opened by role
{"primary":["owasp-password-storage","nist-sp800-63b-4"],"superseded":["nist-sp800-63b-3"],"secondary":["rfc9106"]}
displayed share
{"owasp-password-storage":1,"owasp-authentication":0.0537,"rfc9106":0.4488,"nist-sp800-63b-4":0.1663,"nist-sp800-63b-3":0.0612}
cited count
2
verified count
2
hallucinated count
0
citation integrity
1
hallucinated urls
[]
evidence block
true
evidence block repaired
false
evidence count
7
verified quote count
7
verified quote rate
1
evidence
[{"url":"https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Password_Storage_Cheat_Sheet.html","claim":"OWASP recommends Argon2id as the primary password hashing algorithm with minimum configuration of 19 MiB memory, 2 iterations, and 1 parallelism","quote":"Use Argon2id with a minimum configuration of 19 MiB of memory, an iteration count of 2, and 1 degree of parallelism.","verified":true,"document":"owasp-password-storage"},{"url":"https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Password_Storage_Cheat_Sheet.html","claim":"OWASP recommends PBKDF2 with 600,000 iterations and HMAC-SHA-256 for FIPS-140 compliance","quote":"If FIPS-140 compliance is required, use PBKDF2 with a work factor of 600,000 or more and set with an internal hash function of HMAC-SHA-256.","verified":true,"document":"owasp-password-storage"},{"url":"https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html","claim":"NIST SP 800-63B-4 requires an approved password hashing scheme from SP 800-132 or updated NIST guidelines","quote":"An approved password hashing scheme published in the latest revision of [SP800-132] or updated NIST guidelines on password hashing schemes SHOULD be used.","verified":true,"document":"nist-sp800-63b-4"},{"url":"https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html","claim":"NIST defines approved cryptography as FIPS-approved or NIST-recommended techniques","quote":"approved cryptography An encryption algorithm, hash function, random bit generator, or similar technique that is Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)-approved or NIST-recommended.","verified":true,"document":"nist-sp800-63b-4"},{"url":"https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html","claim":"NIST SP 800-63B-4 mandates passwords be salted and hashed with suitable password hashing scheme","quote":"Passwords SHALL be salted and hashed using a suitable password hashing scheme.","verified":true,"document":"nist-sp800-63b-4"},{"url":"https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html","claim":"For federal agencies, cryptography used by verifiers must be validated to FIPS 140 Level 1","quote":"Cryptography used by verifiers operated by or on behalf of federal agencies at AAL1 SHALL be validated to meet the requirements of [FIPS140] Level 1.","verified":true,"document":"nist-sp800-63b-4"},{"url":"https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Password_Storage_Cheat_Sheet.html","claim":"OWASP states PBKDF2 is permitted by NIST SP 800-63B-4 and has FIPS-140 validated implementations","quote":"Since PBKDF2 is permitted by NIST SP 800-63B-4 and has FIPS-140 validated implementations, it should be the preferred algorithm when these are required.","verified":true,"document":"owasp-password-storage"}]
judge unverified quotes
0
judge verdicts
[{"owasp-argon2id":{"status":"met","support":["E1"]},"owasp-conditions":{"status":"met","support":["E2"]},"nist-current":{"status":"met","support":["E3","E5"]},"nist-revision":{"status":"missing","support":[]},"reconciliation":{"status":"met","support":["E2","E7"]},"common-ground":{"status":"partial","support":["E5"]}},{"owasp-argon2id":{"status":"met","support":["E1"]},"owasp-conditions":{"status":"met","support":["E2"]},"nist-current":{"status":"met","support":["E3","E5"]},"nist-revision":{"status":"missing","support":[]},"reconciliation":{"status":"met","support":["E2","E7"]},"common-ground":{"status":"partial","support":["E5"]}},{"owasp-argon2id":{"status":"met","support":["E1"]},"owasp-conditions":{"status":"met","support":["E2"]},"nist-current":{"status":"met","support":["E3","E5"]},"nist-revision":{"status":"missing","support":[]},"reconciliation":{"status":"met","support":["E2","E7"]},"common-ground":{"status":"partial","support":[]}}]
judge failures
0
grounded weight share
0.875 (88%)

Final answer

Password Hashing Algorithm Recommendations: OWASP vs NIST

Based on the worker's research, here is what each source recommends and how they reconcile:

OWASP Password Storage Guidance

OWASP provides tiered recommendations. For general use without FIPS compliance constraints, OWASP recommends Argon2id as the primary algorithm, configured with a minimum of 19 MiB of memory, an iteration count of 2, and 1 degree of parallelism. Scrypt is recommended as a fallback if Argon2id is unavailable, and bcrypt only for legacy systems.

However, OWASP explicitly addresses the FIPS compliance scenario: when FIPS-140 compliance is required, OWASP recommends PBKDF2 with a work factor of 600,000 or more iterations, using HMAC-SHA-256 as the internal hash function.

NIST SP 800-63B (Current Revision 4) Requirements

NIST SP 800-63B-4 requires that "an approved password hashing scheme published in the latest revision of [SP800-132] or updated NIST guidelines on password hashing schemes SHOULD be used." The standard defines "approved cryptography" as "Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)-approved or NIST-recommended" techniques. NIST mandates that passwords "SHALL be salted and hashed using a suitable password hashing scheme," with the cost factor "SHOULD be as high as practical without negatively impacting verifier performance." Notably, for federal agencies specifically, cryptography used by verifiers "SHALL be validated to meet the requirements of [FIPS140] Level 1."

Reconciliation Strategy

The two sources do not conflict; they address different operational contexts:

  1. When FIPS-140 compliance is NOT required: Both sources recommend modern memory-hard algorithms. OWASP explicitly recommends Argon2id, which aligns with NIST's reference to "updated NIST guidelines" rather than the older SP 800-132.
  2. When FIPS-140 compliance IS required: Both sources align on PBKDF2 as the appropriate choice. OWASP explicitly states that PBKDF2 "is permitted by NIST SP 800-63B-4 and has FIPS-140 validated implementations" and should be the preferred algorithm when FIPS compliance is required.
  3. Implementation guidance: Teams should first determine whether FIPS compliance is mandatory (typically for federal agencies or systems supporting federal operations). If not required, implement Argon2id per OWASP specifications. If FIPS compliance is required, implement PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-256 with 600,000 iterations or more.

{"evidence": [{"claim": "OWASP recommends Argon2id as the primary password hashing algorithm with minimum configuration of 19 MiB memory, 2 iterations, and 1 parallelism", "quote": "Use Argon2id with a minimum configuration of 19 MiB of memory, an iteration count of 2, and 1 degree of parallelism.", "url": "https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Password_Storage_Cheat_Sheet.html"}, {"claim": "OWASP recommends PBKDF2 with 600,000 iterations and HMAC-SHA-256 for FIPS-140 compliance", "quote": "If FIPS-140 compliance is required, use PBKDF2 with a work factor of 600,000 or more and set with an internal hash function of HMAC-SHA-256.", "url": "https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Password_Storage_Cheat_Sheet.html"}, {"claim": "NIST SP 800-63B-4 requires an approved password hashing scheme from SP 800-132 or updated NIST guidelines", "quote": "An approved password hashing scheme published in the latest revision of [SP800-132] or updated NIST guidelines on password hashing schemes SHOULD be used.", "url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"}, {"claim": "NIST defines approved cryptography as FIPS-approved or NIST-recommended techniques", "quote": "approved cryptography An encryption algorithm, hash function, random bit generator, or similar technique that is Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)-approved or NIST-recommended.", "url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"}, {"claim": "NIST SP 800-63B-4 mandates passwords be salted and hashed with suitable password hashing scheme", "quote": "Passwords SHALL be salted and hashed using a suitable password hashing scheme.", "url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"}, {"claim": "For federal agencies, cryptography used by verifiers must be validated to FIPS 140 Level 1", "quote": "Cryptography used by verifiers operated by or on behalf of federal agencies at AAL1 SHALL be validated to meet the requirements of [FIPS140] Level 1.", "url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"}, {"claim": "OWASP states PBKDF2 is permitted by NIST SP 800-63B-4 and has FIPS-140 validated implementations", "quote": "Since PBKDF2 is permitted by NIST SP 800-63B-4 and has FIPS-140 validated implementations, it should be the preferred algorithm when these are required.", "url": "https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Password_Storage_Cheat_Sheet.html"}]}

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.