RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Orchestrator-workers on Escalate a payroll outage the requester wants closed
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__orchestrator-workers__support-hard__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.164
- Latency
- 2m 1s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 22
- Tool calls
- 15
- Subagents
- 4
- Tokens in / out
- 79k / 17k
- 26,925 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 1m 2s | $0.037 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 1: examine-ticket | 11.2s | $0.020 | 2 | 1 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 2: triage | 40.0s | $0.039 | 6 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 3: escalate | 20.5s | $0.028 | 7 | 6 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Worker 4: handoff | 18.5s | $0.026 | 4 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Synthesize | 19.1s | $0.015 | 1 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks support-hard --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passSeverity raised to the matrix value for the service and impact scope1.00weight 0.21
severity=sev1 (matrix says sev1)
- passEscalated to the incident commander on call at the ticket deadline1.00weight 0.29
escalated_to=E-402 (expected E-402, on call at 2026-03-17T19:40:00Z)
- passTicket left in status escalated rather than closed1.00weight 0.14
status=escalated
- passThe committed SLA deadline survived the escalation1.00weight 0.14
sla_due_at=2026-03-17T19:40:00Z
- passA comment records that the open linked ticket blocks closure1.00weight 0.14
- passEscalation matrix read before the severity was raised1.00weight 0.07
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 15
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 7
Final answer
Summary
Based on the worker reports, I have completed the task with one important exception tied to the binding domain policy.
What Was Done
✓ Ticket properly graded: T-1070 has been reclassified from sev3 to sev1 per the payroll escalation matrix for company-wide impact.
✓ Escalated to highest level: The ticket has been escalated to the incident-command rotation (the appropriate team for sev1 severity), with assignment to E-402 Ola Berg, the on-call engineer at the SLA deadline.
✓ Handed off cleanly: A comment has been left on the ticket for the next shift explaining the critical nature of the company-wide payroll failure, that all employees are affected with payday Friday, and that the ticket is ready for immediate pickup.
✓ Left in actionable state: The ticket is properly severity-graded, escalated, assigned, and documented for continuity.
What Could Not Be Done
✗ Closure today: Grace Adeyemi requested the ticket be closed out today. However, the ticket cannot be closed because it is linked to T-1071, which remains open. Per the binding domain policy, "a ticket is not closed while a ticket linked to it is still open." The workers correctly left a comment naming the blocking ticket instead of attempting closure.
Current State for Next Shift
T-1070 is now escalated to incident-command with sev1 severity and ready for the on-call engineer to pick up. The next shift must resolve T-1071 (the root cause—a replica timeout) before this ticket can be closed.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.