RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2

Orchestrator-workers on Triage the weekend's queue on Monday morning

claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__orchestrator-workers__support-monday-triage__r2

Score

0.244

wrong answer

design ran as designed

Cost: $0.225
Latency: 2m 32s; setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns: 64
Tool calls: 59
Subagents: 2
Tokens in / out: 362k / 24k; 320,894 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held

Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.

Phases

Spend$0.225

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

Phase	Duration	Cost	Turns	Tools	Model
Decompose	48.0s	$0.029	2	0	claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Worker 1: saturday-triage	1m 27s	$0.101	36	35	claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Worker 2: sunday-triage	1m 13s	$0.081	25	24	claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Synthesize	17.4s	$0.014	1	0	claude-haiku-4-5-20251001

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks support-monday-triage --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

passT-2001 graded sev3
1.00weight 0.02
severity=sev3
passT-2001 due 2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
failT-2001 assigned to E-303
0.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
passT-2002 graded sev4
1.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
passT-2002 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
failT-2002 assigned to E-203
0.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
passT-2003 graded sev2
1.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
failT-2003 due 2026-03-23T10:30:00Z
0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T13:00:00Z
failT-2003 assigned to E-101
0.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
passT-2004 graded sev2
1.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
failT-2004 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T13:00:00Z
failT-2004 assigned to E-201
0.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
failT-2006 graded sev2
0.00weight 0.02
severity=sev3
failT-2006 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
failT-2006 assigned to E-201
0.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
failT-2007 graded sev2
0.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
failT-2007 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
failT-2007 assigned to E-601
0.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
failT-2008 graded sev4
0.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
failT-2008 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
failT-2008 assigned to E-302
0.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
failT-2009 graded sev4
0.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
failT-2009 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
failT-2009 assigned to E-102
0.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
passT-2011 graded sev2
1.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
failT-2011 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T13:00:00Z
failT-2011 assigned to E-201
0.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
failT-2013 graded sev2
0.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
failT-2013 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
failT-2013 assigned to E-303
0.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
failT-2015 graded sev1
0.00weight 0.02
failT-2015 due 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z
0.00weight 0.02
failT-2015 assigned to E-201
0.00weight 0.02
failT-2016 graded sev4
0.00weight 0.02
failT-2016 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
0.00weight 0.02
failT-2016 assigned to E-302
0.00weight 0.02
passT-2012 merged into T-2003
1.00weight 0.02
failT-1999 merged into T-2003
0.00weight 0.02
passT-2005 merged into T-2004
1.00weight 0.02
failT-2010 closed as not a service request
0.00weight 0.02
passT-2014 closed as not a service request
1.00weight 0.02

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls: 59
failed tool calls: 3
distinct tools: 9

Final answer

Triage Summary - Weekend Queue

Critical Issues with These Reports

The worker reports contain serious date inconsistencies that call their reliability into question:

Current date per system: 2026-10-13 (Monday, October)
Dates in both reports: 2026-03-21 to 2026-03-26 (March - nearly 7 months in the past)

Both workers claim to have retrieved tickets "created on Saturday 2026-10-11" and "Sunday 2026-10-12" but then report on tickets from March 2026 with deadlines set in March. This is internally inconsistent and suggests the reports may be describing historical triage work, not the current weekend's queue.

What the Reports Claim Was Triaged

Closed as Non-Service-Requests:

T-2014 (automatic out-of-office reply) - both workers report this

Merged Duplicates:

T-2005 merged into T-2004 (CRM search issues)
T-2012 merged into T-2003 (Payments build failures)

Remaining Open After Triage:

Saturday-triage worker reports: T-2001, T-2002, T-2003, T-2004, T-2006, T-2011
Sunday-triage worker reports: only T-2006 (mentions "5 Sunday tickets" total: T-2004, T-2005, T-2006, T-2012, T-2014)

Conflicts and Gaps

Overlap: Both workers appear to have triaged the same tickets, creating duplicate work
Coverage unclear: Saturday-triage mentions 6 remaining open tickets; Sunday-triage reports only 1, suggesting they either worked different queues or there's confusion about scope
No verification: I cannot confirm whether all weekend tickets were actually retrieved and triaged, as I have no tools to inspect the current queue

Recommendation

The triage work cannot be confirmed complete. The reports' date inconsistencies and the unexplained difference in scope between the two workers suggests manual verification is needed: check the current new queue (2026-10-11 to 2026-10-12 creation dates) and confirm all tickets have been properly triaged.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set: scaffold-or-scale-v1
models: Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort: high
repeats: 2
fixtures: replay
runs: 900 / 900
strategy cost: $354.44
judge cost: $9.19
wall clock: 9h 48m
git: fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.