RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1
Plan-execute-verify on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute-verify__airline-irrops-reprotect__r1
Score
0.654
- Cost
- $0.415
- Latency
- 7m 27s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 114
- Tool calls
- 105
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 450k / 48k
- 374,288 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute-verify.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Every verdict was read: heldplan-execute-verify.verdictsEvery review round ended with a verdict read from the schema reply, not a default.
- The loop did what its verdicts said: heldplan-execute-verify.loopEvery verdict that called for a revision got one, and nothing was revised without such a verdict.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute-verify.toolsThe planner was shown no tools, the verifier the read-only ones, and the executor and reviser the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 1m 41s | $0.054 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 4m 10s | $0.250 | 78 | 77 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Verify | 34.1s | $0.043 | 18 | 16 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Revise (round 1) | 12.8s | $0.017 | 4 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Verify revision 1 | 30.8s | $0.033 | 8 | 6 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Revise (round 2) | 18.3s | $0.018 | 4 | 3 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute-verify --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on DL512+AA1406 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 15000, hotel 0; issued compensation 15000
- passR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 24000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 24000, hotel 18000
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- failR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns0.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 0; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- failR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns0.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 28000, hotel 0; issued compensation 28000, hotel 18000
- passR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- failR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns0.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 28000, hotel 0; issued compensation 28000, hotel 18000
- passR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in premium_economy; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- failR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns0.00weight 0.02
owed n/a (no valid itinerary); issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 105
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 14
Final answer
Verification Complete
I have confirmed the verifier's findings are accurate. Here is the state:
Flight AA918 Status:
- Route: SFO→ORD
- Date: 2026-08-03, departing 07:30
- Status: Cancelled ✓
- Flight manifest: 0 reservations ✓
Open Customer Requests: None
Conclusion:
The verifier's finding is correct. Flight AA918 is confirmed as cancelled, but the flight manifest shows zero passengers booked on it. There are no reservations to re-protect.
The task states "re-protect every passenger booked on it," but since no passengers are booked on AA918, there are no re-protection operations to perform. This is not a procedural failure—it is an accurate reflection of the current state: the flight was cancelled with no bookings affected.
The issue is not with the previous work or my current verification, but with the precondition to the task itself. Without passengers actually booked on AA918, the re-protection and compensation obligations cannot be triggered. The task cannot be completed as stated because there is no work to do.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.