RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Plan-execute-verify on Rebook onto the earliest available flight and settle the difference
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute-verify__airline-medium__r2
Score
0.000
- Cost
- $0.147
- Latency
- 2m 21s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 38
- Tool calls
- 30
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 119k / 13k
- 75,023 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute-verify.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Every verdict was read: heldplan-execute-verify.verdictsEvery review round ended with a verdict read from the schema reply, not a default.
- The loop did what its verdicts said: heldplan-execute-verify.loopEvery verdict that called for a revision got one, and nothing was revised without such a verdict.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute-verify.toolsThe planner was shown no tools, the verifier the read-only ones, and the executor and reviser the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 25.0s | $0.017 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 17.9s | $0.025 | 8 | 7 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Verify | 32.5s | $0.036 | 10 | 8 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Revise (round 1) | 22.8s | $0.026 | 8 | 7 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Verify revision 1 | 43.0s | $0.043 | 10 | 8 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute-verify --tasks airline-medium --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passReservation moved to the earliest flight with an available seat, same cabin1.00weight 0.43
booked on AA204, expected AA204
- failExactly one fee, the fare difference for the flight actually booked0.00weight 0.43
fare difference owed on the booked flight: 8000 cents
- passExactly one economy seat moved from the old flight to the new one1.00weight 0.14
Penalties
- policy violationCharged a change fee to a tier the fare rules exempt×0 · hard fail
Dana Whitfield is a gold member; gold and platinum are exempt from change fees.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 30
- failed tool calls
- 2
- distinct tools
- 9
Final answer
Perfect! I've fixed the issue. Here's what I did:
Correction Made:
- Issued a $75 refund to Dana Whitfield's original payment method to reverse the incorrectly charged change fee
Final Financial Position:
- The ledger now shows the $75 change fee refunded (L3), effectively removing its impact
- Dana only owes the $80 fare difference (AA204's $390 fare vs AA210's $310 fare), which correctly applies to all tiers including gold
- Net amount owed: $80.00
Reason:
Dana Whitfield holds gold tier frequent flyer status, which exempts her from the $75 economy change fee per the fare rules. The fare difference of $80 remains charged correctly, as no tier is exempt from fare differences. The refund corrects the earlier error.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.