RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1
Plan-execute-verify on Settle a desk of returns by what actually came back
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute-verify__ecommerce-returns-desk__r1
Score
0.521
- Cost
- $0.519
- Latency
- 9m 2s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 186
- Tool calls
- 177
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 685k / 57k
- 591,161 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute-verify.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Every verdict was read: heldplan-execute-verify.verdictsEvery review round ended with a verdict read from the schema reply, not a default.
- The loop did what its verdicts said: heldplan-execute-verify.loopEvery verdict that called for a revision got one, and nothing was revised without such a verdict.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute-verify.toolsThe planner was shown no tools, the verifier the read-only ones, and the executor and reviser the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 36.4s | $0.022 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 2m 12s | $0.158 | 91 | 90 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Verify | 2m 41s | $0.166 | 55 | 53 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Revise (round 1) | 28.6s | $0.032 | 14 | 13 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Verify revision 1 | 1m 15s | $0.066 | 17 | 15 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Revise (round 2) | 1m 49s | $0.075 | 7 | 6 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute-verify --tasks ecommerce-returns-desk --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- failRMA-801: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 10965 card; got 11000 card
- passRMA-801 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-802: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 15900 card; got 13600 card
- passRMA-802 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-803: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 27965 store_credit; got 28000 store_credit
- passRMA-803 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-804: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 27965 store_credit; got 28000 store_credit
- passRMA-804 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-805: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 5520 card; got 5900 store_credit
- passRMA-805 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-806: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 7350 card; got 7350 card
- passRMA-806 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-807: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 15900 card; got 13515 card
- passRMA-807 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-808: investigation opened, nothing refunded1.00weight 0.04
expected no refund; got no refund
- passRMA-808 left investigating1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-809: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 3800 card; got 3300 card
- passRMA-809 left open1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-810: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 9900 card; got 9900 card
- passRMA-810 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-811: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 4900 card; got 4900 card
- passRMA-811 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-812: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 21900 card; got 21900 store_credit
- passRMA-812 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-813: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 10965 card; got 11000 store_credit
- passRMA-813 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-814: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 31800 card; got 27100 card
- passRMA-814 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- failRMA-815: one refund of the right amount and method0.00weight 0.04
expected 10965 card; got 11000 store_credit
- passRMA-815 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passRMA-816: one refund of the right amount and method1.00weight 0.04
expected 4165 card; got 4165 card
- passRMA-816 left closed1.00weight 0.01
- passP-KEY returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +3 damaged +1 (expected +3 / +1)
- passP-HDP returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +4 damaged +0 (expected +4 / +0)
- passP-MON returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +2 damaged +0 (expected +2 / +0)
- passP-HUB returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +1 damaged +0 (expected +1 / +0)
- passP-MOU returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +2 damaged +2 (expected +2 / +2)
- passP-CAB returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +1 damaged +1 (expected +1 / +1)
- passP-DOC returns restocked into the right buckets1.00weight 0.02
sellable +0 damaged +1 (expected +0 / +1)
- failStore-credit balances moved by exactly the store-credit refunds owed0.00weight 0.02
C-803=28000 (expected 27965), C-804=29200 (expected 29165), C-805=5900 (expected 0), C-812=21900 (expected 0), C-813=11000 (expected 0), C-815=11000 (expected 0)
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 177
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 13
Final answer
I'll analyze these issues carefully by examining the current state.
The current state of RMA-809 shows:
- Goods received: 2 units (1 resellable received 2026-07-25, 1 damaged received 2026-07-25)
- RMA status: Open
- Goods restocked: Yes - 1 unit to sellable stock, 1 unit to damaged bucket
- Refund issued: $3300 to card
Regarding Issue 1 (RMA not closed):
The domain policy states: "Close a return once every unit it covers has been received and settled. Leave it open while units are still on their way."
RMA-809 covers 3 units total. The customer's note says they're sending "all three back in two parcels." Only 2 units have been received; 1 is still in transit. Therefore, the RMA should remain OPEN, which is the current state. The "not being closed" is actually correct per domain rules. This issue is based on a mistaken expectation.
Regarding Issue 2 (Refund amount discrepancy):
The calculation is straightforward:
- 2 units received × $1900 per unit = $3800 gross
- Less 15% restocking fee (changed_mind reason): $285 per unit
- Correct refund: ($1900 - $285) × 2 = $3230
- Actual refund recorded: $3300
- Discrepancy: $70 overpayment
However, this overpayment cannot be corrected because:
- The domain policy states: "Money already refunded on an order is never refunded again" - card refunds cannot be reversed or undone
- Refunds to the original payment method cannot be cancelled through available tools
- The overpayment to the cardholder has already been recorded in the system
Summary:
Issue 1 is mistaken - the RMA correctly remains open. Issue 2 identifies a real $70 overpayment that occurred, but it cannot be corrected through available tools since card refunds cannot be undone. The RMA-809 is in the proper state per domain policy: OPEN (awaiting the third unit's arrival), with goods already restocked and refunded for the 2 units received.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.