RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1
Plan-execute-verify on Consolidate duplicate CRM reports
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute-verify__support-medium__r1
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.315
- Latency
- 6m 24s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 33
- Tool calls
- 28
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 214k / 39k
- 152,439 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute-verify.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Every verdict was read: heldplan-execute-verify.verdictsEvery review round ended with a verdict read from the schema reply, not a default.
- The loop did what its verdicts said: heldplan-execute-verify.loopEvery verdict that called for a revision got one, and nothing was revised without such a verdict.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute-verify.toolsThe planner was shown no tools, the verifier the read-only ones, and the executor and reviser the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 1m 2s | $0.034 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 51.7s | $0.065 | 15 | 14 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Verify | 4m 30s | $0.216 | 16 | 14 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute-verify --tasks support-medium --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passSurvivor carries the earliest SLA deadline of the merged set1.00weight 0.23
sla_due_at=2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (expected 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z)
- passBoth duplicate reports were merged into the earliest-created ticket1.00weight 0.23
T-1053: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052; T-1054: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052
- passThe engineering tracking ticket now points at the survivor1.00weight 0.15
T-1061 links=[T-1052]
- passSurvivor re-graded from the matrix for its widened impact scope1.00weight 0.15
severity=sev2 (matrix says sev2)
- passSurvivor assigned to the engineer on call for the owning rotation at its deadline1.00weight 0.15
assignee=E-201 (expected E-201)
- passEvery ticket folded in was read before the merge1.00weight 0.08
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 28
- failed tool calls
- 1
- distinct tools
- 10
Final answer
Summary
I've successfully consolidated the duplicate CRM tickets as requested. Here's what I found and did:
Ticket Analysis
Out of 5 open CRM tickets, I identified:
Same underlying problem (CRM search failing with 500 errors): T-1052, T-1053, T-1054
- T-1052 (07:05): Initial report about search returning 500 errors
- T-1053 (08:40): Same issue, broader impact (department-level)
- T-1054 (09:02): Same issue, requester explicitly noted "same thing my colleagues are reporting"
Different problems (left alone):
- T-1055: CSV export producing empty files (unrelated issue)
- T-1061: Engineering tracking ticket for search index rebuild (internal tracking, not a customer report)
Consolidation Actions
I merged T-1053 and T-1054 into T-1052 (the earliest-created report) with:
Correct Severity: Updated to sev2
- Broadest impact scope was department-level (from T-1053)
- Per escalation matrix: department-level CRM impact = sev2
Correct Assignment: Assigned to E-201 Ines Kovac
- CRM service owned by "business-apps" rotation
- E-201 is on-call for business-apps at the SLA deadline time (2026-03-17T12:40:00Z)
- Preserved Deadline: SLA remains 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (earliest deadline from merged tickets)
- Documented: Added a comment explaining the consolidation
Result: Revenue Ops now has a single, properly graded and assigned ticket tracking the CRM search failure affecting their department.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.