RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2

Plan-execute-verify on Consolidate duplicate CRM reports

claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute-verify__support-medium__r2

Score

1.000

passed

design ran as designed

Cost: $0.142
Latency: 2m 12s; setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns: 29
Tool calls: 24
Subagents: 0
Tokens in / out: 137k / 14k; 97,317 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held

Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute-verify.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
Every verdict was read: heldplan-execute-verify.verdictsEvery review round ended with a verdict read from the schema reply, not a default.
The loop did what its verdicts said: heldplan-execute-verify.loopEvery verdict that called for a revision got one, and nothing was revised without such a verdict.
Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute-verify.toolsThe planner was shown no tools, the verifier the read-only ones, and the executor and reviser the full toolset.

Phases

Spend$0.142

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

Phase	Duration	Cost	Turns	Tools	Model
Plan	25.3s	$0.017	2	0	claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Execute	47.2s	$0.060	15	14	claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Verify	59.6s	$0.066	12	10	claude-haiku-4-5-20251001

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute-verify --tasks support-medium --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

passSurvivor carries the earliest SLA deadline of the merged set
1.00weight 0.23
sla_due_at=2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (expected 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z)
passBoth duplicate reports were merged into the earliest-created ticket
1.00weight 0.23
T-1053: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052; T-1054: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052
passThe engineering tracking ticket now points at the survivor
1.00weight 0.15
T-1061 links=[T-1052]
passSurvivor re-graded from the matrix for its widened impact scope
1.00weight 0.15
severity=sev2 (matrix says sev2)
passSurvivor assigned to the engineer on call for the owning rotation at its deadline
1.00weight 0.15
assignee=E-201 (expected E-201)
passEvery ticket folded in was read before the merge
1.00weight 0.08

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls: 24
failed tool calls: 0
distinct tools: 9

Final answer

Summary

I have successfully consolidated the duplicate CRM tickets. Here's what was done:

Consolidation Actions:

Merged tickets T-1053 and T-1054 into T-1052 - all three were customer reports of the same underlying problem: CRM search returning 500 errors.

Consolidated Ticket (T-1052):

Title: CRM search returns 500 error
Impact scope: department (inherited the broadest scope from the three tickets)
Severity: sev2 (correct per CRM escalation matrix for department-wide impact)
SLA deadline: 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (the earliest deadline from the merged group, preserving the commitment to the most urgent requester)
Assigned to: E-201 Ines Kovac (on-call for business-apps rotation at deadline time)

Tickets Left Alone (Different Problems):

T-1055: CSV export produces empty file (completely different functionality - not merged)
T-1061: Engineering tracking ticket for search index rebuild (internal ticket, not a customer report of the problem - linked to the consolidated T-1052)

The consolidated ticket is now properly graded, assigned, and ready for the on-call engineer to work on the actual root cause.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set: scaffold-or-scale-v1
models: Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort: high
repeats: 2
fixtures: replay
runs: 900 / 900
strategy cost: $354.44
judge cost: $9.19
wall clock: 9h 48m
git: fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.