RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1
Plan-execute-verify on Triage the weekend's queue on Monday morning
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute-verify__support-monday-triage__r1
Score
0.644
- Cost
- $0.370
- Latency
- 5m 43s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 147
- Tool calls
- 138
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 513k / 36k
- 434,445 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute-verify.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Every verdict was read: heldplan-execute-verify.verdictsEvery review round ended with a verdict read from the schema reply, not a default.
- The loop did what its verdicts said: heldplan-execute-verify.loopEvery verdict that called for a revision got one, and nothing was revised without such a verdict.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute-verify.toolsThe planner was shown no tools, the verifier the read-only ones, and the executor and reviser the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 55.6s | $0.045 | 3 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 1m 58s | $0.137 | 67 | 66 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Verify | 1m 40s | $0.110 | 45 | 43 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Revise (round 1) | 28.9s | $0.035 | 17 | 16 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Verify revision 1 | 40.7s | $0.044 | 15 | 13 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute-verify --tasks support-monday-triage --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passT-2001 graded sev31.00weight 0.02
severity=sev3
- passT-2001 due 2026-03-23T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
- failT-2001 assigned to E-3030.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-301
- passT-2002 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2002 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- failT-2002 assigned to E-2030.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-202
- passT-2003 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- failT-2003 due 2026-03-23T10:30:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2003 assigned to E-1011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-101
- passT-2004 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2004 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2004 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- failT-2006 graded sev20.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- failT-2006 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- failT-2006 assigned to E-2010.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-202
- passT-2007 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2007 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2007 assigned to E-6011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-601
- passT-2008 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2008 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2008 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2009 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2009 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2009 assigned to E-1021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-102
- passT-2011 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2011 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2011 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2013 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2013 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- failT-2013 assigned to E-3030.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-301
- passT-2015 graded sev11.00weight 0.02
severity=sev1
- passT-2015 due 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T09:10:00Z
- passT-2015 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2016 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2016 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2016 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2012 merged into T-20031.00weight 0.02
- failT-1999 merged into T-20030.00weight 0.02
- passT-2005 merged into T-20041.00weight 0.02
- passT-2010 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
- passT-2014 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
- policy violationLeft a ticket with an engineer who is on leave when it falls due×0.8
T-2001 -> E-301; T-2002 -> E-202; T-2006 -> E-202; T-2013 -> E-301
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 138
- failed tool calls
- 1
- distinct tools
- 14
Final answer
Perfect! The triage is now complete. Here's my final summary:
Fixed: Weekend Ticket Triage (2026-03-23)
Completed triage for 2 missed tickets:
T-2015 - Payslips missing for the Finance department
- Service: payroll
- Impact: department
- Severity: sev1 (from matrix: payroll + department = sev1)
- Response target: 60 minutes
- Deadline: 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z (triage time + 60 min)
- Assigned to: E-201 Ines Kovac (on-call for business-apps rotation at deadline)
- Status: open
T-2016 - VPN token app asks me to register again
- Service: vpn
- Impact: single-user
- Severity: sev4 (from matrix: vpn + single-user = sev4)
- Response target: 24 business hours (1440 minutes)
Deadline: 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- Current: Mon 08:10 (before business hours 09:00-17:00)
- Mon 09:00-17:00 = 8 hours
- Tue 09:00-17:00 = 8 hours (total 16)
- Wed = company holiday (spring day, skipped)
- Thu 09:00-17:00 = 8 hours (total 24) → deadline Thu 17:00
- Assigned to: E-302 Marcus Feld (on-call for network-primary rotation at deadline)
- Status: open
All weekend tickets are now triaged according to the handbook.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.