RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1
Plan-execute on Add checked bags and collect the right fee
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute__airline-easy__r1
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.042
- Latency
- 39.0s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 9
- Tool calls
- 5
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 28k / 4.1k
- 14,160 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 21.3s | $0.019 | 3 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 17.8s | $0.024 | 6 | 5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks airline-easy --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passReservation holds three checked bags and is otherwise untouched1.00weight 0.43
checked_bags=3, status=confirmed
- passExactly one baggage fee, for the bags beyond the free allowance1.00weight 0.57
expected 4500 cents for 1 chargeable bag(s), charged 4500
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 5
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 5
Final answer
Perfect! I've successfully completed the task. Here's a summary:
Task Completed:
- Verified reservation R1042: Rosa Mendel is flying to Seattle (SEA) on AS420, currently has 1 checked bag
Calculated free baggage allowance:
- Economy cabin: 1 free bag
- Silver frequent-flyer tier: +1 additional free bag
- Total free allowance: 2 bags
Processed the addition:
- Rosa is adding 2 more bags (1 + 2 = 3 total bags)
- This stays within the 3-bag maximum
- Since she has 2 free bags and now has 3 bags, 1 bag is chargeable
- Charged exactly what she owes: $45.00 (4,500 cents) for the 1 chargeable bag
- Updated her reservation: Checked bags increased from 1 to 3
Rosa's reservation R1042 now has 3 checked bags, and she has been charged $45.00 for the baggage fee.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.