RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute__airline-irrops-reprotect__r2
Score
0.731
- Cost
- $0.263
- Latency
- 4m 31s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 77
- Tool calls
- 73
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 290k / 30k
- 243,350 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 41.3s | $0.034 | 3 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 3m 50s | $0.229 | 74 | 73 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on DL512+AA1406 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 15000, hotel 0; issued compensation 15000
- passR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 24000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 24000, hotel 18000
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- passR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 28000, hotel 0; issued compensation 28000
- passR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 28000, hotel 0; issued compensation 28000
- passR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in premium_economy; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 73
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 9
Final answer
Perfect! I have successfully completed the re-protection of all passengers from the cancelled AA918 flight. Here's a summary of what was accomplished:
Summary
Flight Cancelled: AA918 (SFO→ORD, August 3, 2026, 07:30) - 13 passengers affected
Re-protection Results:
Same-Day, Early Arrivals (Aug 3, 12:25):
- Chloe Park (Platinum, business) → UA88
- Farid Haddad (Gold, basic_economy) → UA88
- Lea Sorensen (Gold, premium_economy) → UA88
Same-Day, Mid-Afternoon Arrivals (Aug 3, 15:15):
- Iris Vance (Platinum, economy) → AA204
- Ben Okafor (Gold, economy) → AA204
- Elena Fox (None, basic_economy) → AA204
Same-Day, Late Evening Arrival (Aug 3, 23:50):
- Jun Takeda & Kofi Mensah (Gold group, economy) → AA210
- Mo Farah (Silver, economy with BOS connection) → AA210 → AA1410 to BOS (Aug 4, 12:25)
Early Connections on Aug 3:
- Dev Mehta (Silver, economy with BOS connection) → DL512 → AA1406 to BOS (Aug 3, 23:20)
Next-Day Arrivals (Aug 4, 15:15):
- Hugo Brandt (Silver, economy) → AA206
- Grace Liu (None, economy) → AA206
- Ana Ruiz (None, economy) → AA206
Compensation Issued (based on delay to final destination):
- Jun & Kofi Takeda: $280 each (10h+ delay)
- Dev Mehta: $150 (4h 25m delay)
- Mo Farah: $300 + $180 hotel (overnight delay to BOS)
- Hugo Brandt: $300 + $180 hotel (overnight delay)
- Grace Liu: $240 + $180 hotel (overnight delay)
- Ana Ruiz: $300 + $180 hotel (overnight delay)
All passengers notified with:
- New flight details and departure times
- Confirmation of cabin (unchanged from original booking)
- Notification of zero change fees
- Compensation and hotel voucher details where applicable
All re-protection was completed according to irregular-operations policy: no change fees, priority by frequent-flyer tier + booking date, each passenger on the itinerary reaching their final destination soonest.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.