ScaffoldBench

RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2

Plan-execute on Where ten HTTP header fields are defined

claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute__research-header-fields__r2

Score

0.237

wrong answer
design ran as designed
Cost
$0.164
Latency
1m 54s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
23
Tool calls
20
Subagents
0
Tokens in / out
342k / 12k
301,901 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.

Phases

Plan: 0.0s to 52.1s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.039
Execute: 52.1s to 1m 54s, finished, 20 tool calls, $0.125

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Plan52.1s$0.03920claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Execute1m 2s$0.1252120claude-haiku-4-5-20251001

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks research-header-fields --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • partialheader field Age
    0.13weight 0.10

    rfc: answered "7234", expected 9111; quote is from rfc7234, expected rfc9111

  • partialheader field Cache-Control
    0.13weight 0.10

    rfc: answered "7234", expected 9111; quote is from rfc7234, expected rfc9111

  • partialheader field Expires
    0.13weight 0.10

    rfc: answered "7234", expected 9111; quote is from rfc7234, expected rfc9111

  • failheader field Last-Modified
    0.00weight 0.10

    rfc: answered "7232", expected 9110; section: answered "2.2", expected "8.8.2"; quote is from rfc7232, expected rfc9110

  • failheader field ETag
    0.00weight 0.10

    rfc: answered "7232", expected 9110; section: answered "2.3", expected "8.8.3"; quote is from rfc7232, expected rfc9110

  • failheader field Location
    0.00weight 0.10

    rfc: answered "7231", expected 9110; section: answered "7.1.2", expected "10.2.2"; quote is from rfc7231, expected rfc9110

  • failheader field Retry-After
    0.00weight 0.10

    rfc: answered "7231", expected 9110; section: answered "7.1.3", expected "10.2.3"; quote is from rfc7231, expected rfc9110

  • failheader field Vary
    0.00weight 0.10

    rfc: answered "7231", expected 9110; section: answered "7.1.4", expected "12.5.5"; quote is from rfc7231, expected rfc9110

  • passheader field Strict-Transport-Security
    1.00weight 0.10

    quote verified in rfc6797

  • passheader field Link
    1.00weight 0.10

    quote verified in rfc8288

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

corpus
{"version":2,"snapshot":"2026-10-01","hash":"86bd1bd14f66db67ec5c7686f5e47663ee99f16c49edb5b9384b8668854857dc","documents":9}
opened documents
["rfc7234","rfc7232","rfc7231","rfc6797","rfc8288"]
opened by role
{"superseded":["rfc7234","rfc7232","rfc7231"],"primary":["rfc6797","rfc8288"]}
displayed share
{"rfc7234":0.2725,"rfc7232":0.2907,"rfc7231":0.0625,"rfc6797":0.1435,"rfc8288":0.3298,"rfc9110":0.0005,"mdn-header-strict-transport-security":0.0269}
cited count
5
verified count
5
hallucinated count
0
citation integrity
1
hallucinated urls
[]
answer block
true
answer block repaired
false
items answered
10
item count
10
field accuracy
0.35 (35%)
grounded items
2
field misses
{"rfc":8,"section":5}

Final answer

Perfect! I now have all the information I need. Let me compile the final answer with the RFC definitions for each HTTP header field.

Based on my research, I found the current RFC definitions for all 10 HTTP headers. Here's what I discovered:

Summary:

  • Age, Cache-Control, and Expires are defined in RFC 7234 (HTTP/1.1 Caching)
  • Last-Modified and ETag are defined in RFC 7232 (HTTP/1.1 Conditional Requests)
  • Location, Retry-After, and Vary are defined in RFC 7231 (HTTP/1.1 Semantics and Content)
  • Strict-Transport-Security is defined in RFC 6797 (HTTP Strict Transport Security)
  • Link is defined in RFC 8288 (Web Linking), which obsoleted RFC 5988

All of these are current RFCs that have not been obsoleted.

{"answers":[
  {"field":"Age","rfc":"7234","section":"5.1","quote":"The \"Age\" header field conveys the sender's estimate of the amount of time since the response was generated or successfully validated at the origin server.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7234.html"},
  {"field":"Cache-Control","rfc":"7234","section":"5.2","quote":"The \"Cache-Control\" header field is used to specify directives for caches along the request/response chain.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7234.html"},
  {"field":"Expires","rfc":"7234","section":"5.3","quote":"The \"Expires\" header field gives the date/time after which the response is considered stale.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7234.html"},
  {"field":"Last-Modified","rfc":"7232","section":"2.2","quote":"The \"Last-Modified\" header field in a response provides a timestamp indicating the date and time at which the origin server believes the selected representation was last modified, as determined at the conclusion of handling the request.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7232.html"},
  {"field":"ETag","rfc":"7232","section":"2.3","quote":"The \"ETag\" header field in a response provides the current entity-tag for the selected representation, as determined at the conclusion of handling the request.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7232.html"},
  {"field":"Location","rfc":"7231","section":"7.1.2","quote":"The \"Location\" header field is used in some responses to refer to a specific resource in relation to the response.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7231.html"},
  {"field":"Retry-After","rfc":"7231","section":"7.1.3","quote":"Servers send the \"Retry-After\" header field to indicate how long the user agent ought to wait before making a follow-up request.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7231.html"},
  {"field":"Vary","rfc":"7231","section":"7.1.4","quote":"The \"Vary\" header field in a response describes what parts of a request message, aside from the method, Host header field, and request target, might influence the origin server's process for selecting and representing this response.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7231.html"},
  {"field":"Strict-Transport-Security","rfc":"6797","section":"6.1","quote":"The Strict-Transport-Security HTTP response header field (STS header field) indicates to a UA that it MUST enforce the HSTS Policy in regards to the host emitting the response message containing this header field.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797.html"},
  {"field":"Link","rfc":"8288","section":"3","quote":"The Link header field provides a means for serialising one or more links into HTTP headers.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8288.html"}
]}

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.