RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Where ten HTTP header fields are defined
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute__research-header-fields__r2
Score
0.237
- Cost
- $0.164
- Latency
- 1m 54s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 23
- Tool calls
- 20
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 342k / 12k
- 301,901 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 52.1s | $0.039 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 1m 2s | $0.125 | 21 | 20 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks research-header-fields --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- partialheader field Age0.13weight 0.10
rfc: answered "7234", expected 9111; quote is from rfc7234, expected rfc9111
- partialheader field Cache-Control0.13weight 0.10
rfc: answered "7234", expected 9111; quote is from rfc7234, expected rfc9111
- partialheader field Expires0.13weight 0.10
rfc: answered "7234", expected 9111; quote is from rfc7234, expected rfc9111
- failheader field Last-Modified0.00weight 0.10
rfc: answered "7232", expected 9110; section: answered "2.2", expected "8.8.2"; quote is from rfc7232, expected rfc9110
- failheader field ETag0.00weight 0.10
rfc: answered "7232", expected 9110; section: answered "2.3", expected "8.8.3"; quote is from rfc7232, expected rfc9110
- failheader field Location0.00weight 0.10
rfc: answered "7231", expected 9110; section: answered "7.1.2", expected "10.2.2"; quote is from rfc7231, expected rfc9110
- failheader field Retry-After0.00weight 0.10
rfc: answered "7231", expected 9110; section: answered "7.1.3", expected "10.2.3"; quote is from rfc7231, expected rfc9110
- failheader field Vary0.00weight 0.10
rfc: answered "7231", expected 9110; section: answered "7.1.4", expected "12.5.5"; quote is from rfc7231, expected rfc9110
- passheader field Strict-Transport-Security1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in rfc6797
- passheader field Link1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in rfc8288
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- corpus
- {"version":2,"snapshot":"2026-10-01","hash":"86bd1bd14f66db67ec5c7686f5e47663ee99f16c49edb5b9384b8668854857dc","documents":9}
- opened documents
- ["rfc7234","rfc7232","rfc7231","rfc6797","rfc8288"]
- opened by role
- {"superseded":["rfc7234","rfc7232","rfc7231"],"primary":["rfc6797","rfc8288"]}
- displayed share
- {"rfc7234":0.2725,"rfc7232":0.2907,"rfc7231":0.0625,"rfc6797":0.1435,"rfc8288":0.3298,"rfc9110":0.0005,"mdn-header-strict-transport-security":0.0269}
- cited count
- 5
- verified count
- 5
- hallucinated count
- 0
- citation integrity
- 1
- hallucinated urls
- []
- answer block
- true
- answer block repaired
- false
- items answered
- 10
- item count
- 10
- field accuracy
- 0.35 (35%)
- grounded items
- 2
- field misses
- {"rfc":8,"section":5}
Final answer
Perfect! I now have all the information I need. Let me compile the final answer with the RFC definitions for each HTTP header field.
Based on my research, I found the current RFC definitions for all 10 HTTP headers. Here's what I discovered:
Summary:
- Age, Cache-Control, and Expires are defined in RFC 7234 (HTTP/1.1 Caching)
- Last-Modified and ETag are defined in RFC 7232 (HTTP/1.1 Conditional Requests)
- Location, Retry-After, and Vary are defined in RFC 7231 (HTTP/1.1 Semantics and Content)
- Strict-Transport-Security is defined in RFC 6797 (HTTP Strict Transport Security)
- Link is defined in RFC 8288 (Web Linking), which obsoleted RFC 5988
All of these are current RFCs that have not been obsoleted.
{"answers":[
{"field":"Age","rfc":"7234","section":"5.1","quote":"The \"Age\" header field conveys the sender's estimate of the amount of time since the response was generated or successfully validated at the origin server.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7234.html"},
{"field":"Cache-Control","rfc":"7234","section":"5.2","quote":"The \"Cache-Control\" header field is used to specify directives for caches along the request/response chain.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7234.html"},
{"field":"Expires","rfc":"7234","section":"5.3","quote":"The \"Expires\" header field gives the date/time after which the response is considered stale.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7234.html"},
{"field":"Last-Modified","rfc":"7232","section":"2.2","quote":"The \"Last-Modified\" header field in a response provides a timestamp indicating the date and time at which the origin server believes the selected representation was last modified, as determined at the conclusion of handling the request.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7232.html"},
{"field":"ETag","rfc":"7232","section":"2.3","quote":"The \"ETag\" header field in a response provides the current entity-tag for the selected representation, as determined at the conclusion of handling the request.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7232.html"},
{"field":"Location","rfc":"7231","section":"7.1.2","quote":"The \"Location\" header field is used in some responses to refer to a specific resource in relation to the response.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7231.html"},
{"field":"Retry-After","rfc":"7231","section":"7.1.3","quote":"Servers send the \"Retry-After\" header field to indicate how long the user agent ought to wait before making a follow-up request.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7231.html"},
{"field":"Vary","rfc":"7231","section":"7.1.4","quote":"The \"Vary\" header field in a response describes what parts of a request message, aside from the method, Host header field, and request target, might influence the origin server's process for selecting and representing this response.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7231.html"},
{"field":"Strict-Transport-Security","rfc":"6797","section":"6.1","quote":"The Strict-Transport-Security HTTP response header field (STS header field) indicates to a UA that it MUST enforce the HSTS Policy in regards to the host emitting the response message containing this header field.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797.html"},
{"field":"Link","rfc":"8288","section":"3","quote":"The Link header field provides a means for serialising one or more links into HTTP headers.","url":"https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8288.html"}
]}Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.