RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1
Plan-execute on NIST SP 800-63B password rules, current revision
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute__research-nist-password-rules__r1
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.111
- Latency
- 1m 20s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 17
- Tool calls
- 13
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 165k / 8.1k
- 128,035 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 17.9s | $0.015 | 3 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 1m 2s | $0.096 | 14 | 13 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks research-nist-password-rules --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passtopic single-factor-minimum-length: minimum length of a password used as the only authentication factor (characters)1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in nist-sp800-63b-4
- passtopic maximum-length: the maximum password length verifiers permit (characters)1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in nist-sp800-63b-4
- passtopic composition-rules: imposing composition rules, such as requiring a mix of character types1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in nist-sp800-63b-4
- passtopic periodic-change: requiring subscribers to change their passwords periodically1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in nist-sp800-63b-4
- passtopic password-hints: letting subscribers store a password hint that unauthenticated claimants can see1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in nist-sp800-63b-4
- passtopic security-questions: prompting for knowledge-based authentication or security questions when a password is chosen1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in nist-sp800-63b-4
- passtopic blocklist: checking a new password against a blocklist of commonly used, expected or compromised passwords1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in nist-sp800-63b-4
- passtopic password-managers: allowing password managers and autofill1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in nist-sp800-63b-4
- passtopic salt-length: the length of the salt used when storing passwords (bits)1.00weight 0.10
quote verified in nist-sp800-63b-4
- passtopic hashing-scheme: using an approved password hashing scheme from the latest revision of SP 800-1321.00weight 0.10
quote verified in nist-sp800-63b-4
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- corpus
- {"version":2,"snapshot":"2026-10-01","hash":"0786c624b04f6c85e2ed8a55d4acedd99e4cf2c18632a0ebc22ee969fb3e2263","documents":4}
- opened documents
- ["nist-sp800-63b-4"]
- opened by role
- {"primary":["nist-sp800-63b-4"]}
- displayed share
- {"nist-sp800-63b-3":0.0014,"owasp-authentication":0.0061,"nist-sp800-63b-4":0.1405,"owasp-password-storage":0.0132}
- cited count
- 1
- verified count
- 1
- hallucinated count
- 0
- citation integrity
- 1
- hallucinated urls
- []
- answer block
- true
- answer block repaired
- false
- items answered
- 10
- item count
- 10
- field accuracy
- 1
- grounded items
- 10
- field misses
- {}
Final answer
Perfect! Now I have all the information I need to compile the comprehensive answer. Let me verify I have accurate quotes for each requirement from the NIST SP 800-63B-4 document.
Based on my research of the current revision of NIST SP 800-63B (revision 4, published August 2025), I found the password requirements for verifiers and credential service providers in Section 3.1.1. Here's what the document requires for each topic:
Summary of Findings:
The current NIST SP 800-63B-4 specifies clear requirements for password handling by verifiers and CSPs:
- Single-factor passwords must be at least 15 characters (SHALL requirement)
- Maximum length should be at least 64 characters (SHOULD requirement)
- Composition rules like requiring character type mixtures are explicitly prohibited (SHALL NOT)
- Periodic password changes are not required, though forced changes are permitted if compromise is detected (SHALL NOT)
- Password hints accessible to unauthenticated users are prohibited (SHALL NOT)
- Security questions/KBA for password selection are prohibited (SHALL NOT)
- Blocklist checking for commonly used and compromised passwords is required (SHALL)
- Password managers and autofill are explicitly allowed (SHALL)
- Salt length for password hashing must be at least 32 bits (SHALL)
- Hashing scheme should use approved schemes from SP 800-132 (SHOULD)
{
"answers": [
{
"topic": "single-factor-minimum-length",
"keyword": "SHALL",
"value": "15",
"quote": "Verifiers and CSPs SHALL require passwords that are used as a single-factor authentication mechanism to be a minimum of 15 characters in length.",
"url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"
},
{
"topic": "maximum-length",
"keyword": "SHOULD",
"value": "64",
"quote": "Verifiers and CSPs SHOULD permit a maximum password length of at least 64 characters.",
"url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"
},
{
"topic": "composition-rules",
"keyword": "SHALL NOT",
"value": null,
"quote": "Verifiers and CSPs SHALL NOT impose other composition rules (e.g., requiring mixtures of different character types) for passwords.",
"url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"
},
{
"topic": "periodic-change",
"keyword": "SHALL NOT",
"value": null,
"quote": "Verifiers and CSPs SHALL NOT require subscribers to change passwords periodically.",
"url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"
},
{
"topic": "password-hints",
"keyword": "SHALL NOT",
"value": null,
"quote": "Verifiers and CSPs SHALL NOT permit the subscriber to store a hint (e.g., a reminder of how the password was created) that is accessible to an unauthenticated claimant.",
"url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"
},
{
"topic": "security-questions",
"keyword": "SHALL NOT",
"value": null,
"quote": "Verifiers and CSPs SHALL NOT prompt subscribers to use knowledge-based authentication (KBA) (e.g., \"What was the name of your first pet?\") or security questions when choosing passwords.",
"url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"
},
{
"topic": "blocklist",
"keyword": "SHALL",
"value": null,
"quote": "When processing a request to establish or change a password, verifiers SHALL compare the prospective secret against a blocklist that contains known commonly used, expected, or compromised passwords.",
"url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"
},
{
"topic": "password-managers",
"keyword": "SHALL",
"value": null,
"quote": "Verifiers SHALL allow the use of password managers and autofill functionality.",
"url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"
},
{
"topic": "salt-length",
"keyword": "SHALL",
"value": "32",
"quote": "The salt SHALL be at least 32 bits in length and chosen to minimize salt value collisions among stored hashes.",
"url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"
},
{
"topic": "hashing-scheme",
"keyword": "SHOULD",
"value": null,
"quote": "An approved password hashing scheme published in the latest revision of [SP800-132] or updated NIST guidelines on password hashing schemes SHOULD be used.",
"url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html"
}
]
}Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.