RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Triage a new service desk ticket
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute__support-easy__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.062
- Latency
- 51.3s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 11
- Tool calls
- 7
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 35k / 5.8k
- 15,064 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 32.4s | $0.033 | 3 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 19.0s | $0.029 | 8 | 7 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks support-easy --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passSeverity matches the escalation matrix for the service and impact scope1.00weight 0.27
severity=sev3 (matrix says sev3)
- passSLA deadline is the triage time plus the response target for that severity1.00weight 0.27
sla_due_at=2026-03-17T17:20:00Z (expected 2026-03-17T17:20:00Z)
- passAssigned to the engineer on call for the owning rotation at the deadline1.00weight 0.27
assignee=E-301 (expected E-301)
- passTicket left in status open1.00weight 0.09
- passEscalation matrix read before the severity was set1.00weight 0.09
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 7
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 7
Final answer
Perfect! I have successfully triaged ticket T-1041. Here's what I did:
Triage Summary for T-1041
Ticket Details:
- Service: VPN
- Impact Scope: team (9 people from Berlin sales team unable to connect)
- Status: Changed from "new" to "open"
Triage Actions:
Severity: Set to sev3
- Determined from the escalation matrix: VPN service + team impact scope = sev3
Deadline: Set to 2026-03-17T17:20:00Z (8 hours from creation)
- Calculated from sev3 response target of 480 minutes
Assignment: Assigned to E-301 Yuki Sato
- On-call engineer for network-primary rotation (VPN's owning rotation) at the deadline time
The ticket is now properly triaged and in the hands of the responsible engineer with a clear response deadline. No other tickets were modified.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.