RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1
Plan-execute on Consolidate duplicate CRM reports
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__plan-execute__support-medium__r1
Score
0.846
- Cost
- $0.095
- Latency
- 1m 43s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 21
- Tool calls
- 18
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 114k / 9.9k
- 91,542 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 28.6s | $0.016 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 1m 15s | $0.079 | 19 | 18 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks support-medium --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passSurvivor carries the earliest SLA deadline of the merged set1.00weight 0.23
sla_due_at=2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (expected 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z)
- passBoth duplicate reports were merged into the earliest-created ticket1.00weight 0.23
T-1053: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052; T-1054: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052
- passThe engineering tracking ticket now points at the survivor1.00weight 0.15
T-1061 links=[T-1052]
- passSurvivor re-graded from the matrix for its widened impact scope1.00weight 0.15
severity=sev2 (matrix says sev2)
- failSurvivor assigned to the engineer on call for the owning rotation at its deadline0.00weight 0.15
assignee=E-101 (expected E-201)
- passEvery ticket folded in was read before the merge1.00weight 0.08
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 18
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 9
Final answer
Perfect! The task has been completed successfully. Here's a summary of what was done:
Summary
Consolidation Results:
Merged T-1052, T-1053, and T-1054 - These three tickets all reported the same underlying problem: CRM search returning HTTP 500 errors.
- Survivor ticket: T-1052 (earliest created: 2026-03-17T07:05:00Z)
- Merged into: T-1053, T-1054
- Impact scope: Updated to "department" (broadest scope affected)
- Severity: Set to sev2 (correctly mapped for department-wide impact per escalation matrix)
- Deadline: 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (preserved earliest deadline from T-1053)
- Assigned to: E-101 Dana Whitfield (on-call for platform-primary escalation rotation at deadline time)
Left untouched:
- T-1055 (CSV export produces empty file) - Different problem, not related to search failures
- T-1061 (Search index rebuild tracking) - Engineering internal tracking ticket, not a duplicate report; remains linked to T-1052 for coordination
The consolidated ticket T-1052 is now properly graded, assigned to the appropriate escalation rotation, and has the earliest deadline honored per domain policy.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.