RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1
Propose-select on Audit a week of baggage fees
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__propose-select__airline-baggage-audit__r1
Score
0.000
- Cost
- $0.560
- Latency
- 4m 10s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 217
- Tool calls
- 211
- Subagents
- 3
- Tokens in / out
- 516k / 62k
- 404,869 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- All three proposers ran: heldpropose-select.proposalsThree proposers ran in parallel, each from its own angle, and none was starved while another ran.
- The selector chose: heldpropose-select.selectionThe selector picked a proposal by a valid number, read from its schema reply and not a default.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldpropose-select.toolsEach proposer was shown the read-only tools, the selector none, and the executor the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal 1 (policy-first) | 1m 54s | $0.148 | 61 | 60 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Proposal 2 (state-first) | 2m 6s | $0.148 | 63 | 62 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Proposal 3 (outcome-first) | 1m 56s | $0.127 | 54 | 53 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Select | 1m 8s | $0.060 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 55.5s | $0.076 | 37 | 36 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies propose-select --tasks airline-baggage-audit --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passL2 (R8124): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL2: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- failL3 (R8125): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 12000
- failL3: audit outcome recorded as overcharged0.00weight 0.02
- passL4 (R8112): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL4: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- failL5 (R8116): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 5500
- passL5: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL6 (R8117): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL6: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- failL7 (R8118): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 4500
- passL7: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL8 (R8120): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- failL8: audit outcome recorded as correct0.00weight 0.02
- passL9 (R8126): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL9: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- failL10 (R8113): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 7500
- passL10: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL11 (R8115): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL11: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL12 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL12: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL13 (R8123): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- failL13: audit outcome recorded as correct0.00weight 0.02
- failL15 (R8119): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 2500
- passL15: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL16 (R8110): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL16: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL17 (R8111): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL17: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL18 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL18: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- failL19 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 5000
- passL19: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL20 (R8121): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL20: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL21 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL21: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
- unsafe actionMoved money outside the audit: a new charge, or a refund of an entry outside it×0 · hard fail
Out of scope: ledger[L25], ledger[L26], ledger[L27], ledger[L28], ledger[L29], ledger[L30] and 1 more.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 211
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 12
Final answer
Perfect! I have completed the baggage fee audit for the period 2026-07-20 through 2026-07-26. Here's the final summary:
AUDIT SETTLEMENT COMPLETE
All 19 baggage fees audited and settled:
Audit Outcomes Recorded:
- 10 CORRECT (no action): L2, L3, L6, L9, L11, L12, L16, L17, L18, L21
- 2 UNDERCHARGED (per policy, not re-billed): L4 (3000¢), L20 (500¢)
- 7 OVERCHARGED (refunded): L5, L7, L8, L10, L13, L15, L19
Refunds Issued as Travel Credit (39,000¢ total):
Since all affected reservations had no active payment instrument on file, all overcharges were refunded as travel credit per the domain policy:
| Reservation | Amount | Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| R8116 | 7,500¢ ($75.00) | L25 |
| R8118 | 4,500¢ ($45.00) | L26 |
| R8120 | 7,500¢ ($75.00) | L27 |
| R8113 | 7,500¢ ($75.00) | L28 |
| R8123 | 4,500¢ ($45.00) | L29 |
| R8119 | 2,500¢ ($25.00) | L30 |
| R8114 | 5,000¢ ($50.00) | L31 |
Total refunded: $490.00
The two undercharged fees remain as posted per domain policy (never re-bill undercharges).
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.