RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1
Propose-select on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__propose-select__airline-irrops-reprotect__r1
Score
0.962
- Cost
- $0.902
- Latency
- 10m 59s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 201
- Tool calls
- 195
- Subagents
- 3
- Tokens in / out
- 981k / 113k
- 846,033 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- All three proposers ran: heldpropose-select.proposalsThree proposers ran in parallel, each from its own angle, and none was starved while another ran.
- The selector chose: heldpropose-select.selectionThe selector picked a proposal by a valid number, read from its schema reply and not a default.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldpropose-select.toolsEach proposer was shown the read-only tools, the selector none, and the executor the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal 1 (policy-first) | 2m 57s | $0.143 | 33 | 32 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Proposal 2 (state-first) | 2m 27s | $0.153 | 45 | 44 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Proposal 3 (outcome-first) | 3m 15s | $0.161 | 37 | 36 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Select | 3m 49s | $0.148 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 3m 54s | $0.298 | 84 | 83 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies propose-select --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on DL512 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 15000, hotel 0; issued compensation 15000
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 24000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 24000, hotel 18000
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- passR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 0; issued compensation 30000
- passR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in premium_economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- failR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin0.00weight 0.04
on DL512 in premium_economy; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 15000, hotel 0; issued compensation 15000
- passR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 195
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 10
Final answer
Perfect! I have successfully completed the re-protection and compensation for all passengers on the cancelled AA918 flight. Here's a summary of what was accomplished:
Summary: AA918 Cancellation Re-Protection Complete
13 passengers re-protected across 5 alternative flights:
Priority 1 - Platinum Tier (2 passengers):
- Chloe Park (R6103): UA88 business → Arrives ORD 12:25 (1h 15m early) → No compensation
- Iris Vance (R6109): UA88 premium_economy (upgraded) → Arrives ORD 12:25 (1h 15m early) → No compensation
Priority 2 - Gold Tier (4 passengers):
- Jun Takeda & Kofi Mensah (R6110+R6111, Group G-7): AA204 economy → Arrive ORD 15:15 (1h 35m late) → No compensation
- Ben Okafor (R6102): DL512 economy → Arrives ORD 18:40 (5h late) → $150 compensation
- Farid Haddad (R6106): UA88 basic_economy → Arrives ORD 12:25 (1h 15m early) → No compensation
- Lea Sorensen (R6112): DL512 premium_economy → Arrives ORD 18:40 (5h late) → $150 compensation
Priority 3 - Silver Tier (3 passengers):
- Dev Mehta (R6104): AA210 + AA1410 → Arrives BOS 12:25 next day (17.5h late) → $300 compensation + $180 hotel = $480
- Mo Farah (R6113): AA210 + AA1410 → Arrives BOS 12:25 next day (17.5h late) → $300 compensation + $180 hotel = $480
- Hugo Brandt (R6108): AA210 → Arrives ORD 23:50 (10.1h late) → $300 compensation
Priority 4 - None Tier (3 passengers):
- Elena Fox (R6105): AA204 basic_economy → Arrives ORD 15:15 (1h 35m late) → No compensation
- Grace Liu (R6107): AA206 next day → Arrives ORD 15:15 on 08-04 (25.6h late) → $240 compensation + $180 hotel = $420
- Ana Ruiz (R6101): AA206 next day → Arrives ORD 15:15 on 08-04 (25.6h late) → $300 compensation + $180 hotel = $480
Total Compensation Issued: $2,460.00 (11 vouchers covering compensation and hotel costs)
All passengers notified with their new flight details and compensation amounts via email and SMS.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.