ScaffoldBench

RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2

Propose-select on Settle change requests under dated bulletins

claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__propose-select__airline-waiver-desk__r2

Score

0.688

wrong answer
design ran as designed
Cost
$0.647
Latency
7m 21s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
218
Tool calls
211
Subagents
3
Tokens in / out
651k / 74k
530,217 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • All three proposers ran: heldpropose-select.proposalsThree proposers ran in parallel, each from its own angle, and none was starved while another ran.
  • The selector chose: heldpropose-select.selectionThe selector picked a proposal by a valid number, read from its schema reply and not a default.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldpropose-select.toolsEach proposer was shown the read-only tools, the selector none, and the executor the full toolset.

Phases

Proposal 1 (policy-first): 0.0s to 1m 56s, finished, 39 tool calls, $0.116
Proposal 2 (state-first): 0.0s to 2m 26s, finished, 40 tool calls, $0.144
Proposal 3 (outcome-first): 0.0s to 1m 53s, finished, 51 tool calls, $0.109
Select: 2m 26s to 3m 57s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.069
Execute: 3m 57s to 7m 21s, finished, 82 tool calls, $0.209

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Proposal 1 (policy-first)1m 56s$0.1164039claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Proposal 2 (state-first)2m 26s$0.1444140claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Proposal 3 (outcome-first)1m 53s$0.1095251claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Select1m 31s$0.06920claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Execute3m 24s$0.2098382claude-haiku-4-5-20251001

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies propose-select --tasks airline-waiver-desk --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passR5201: DL542 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    1.00weight 0.03
  • passR5201 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    1.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing

  • passQ-301 resolved with a note to the customer
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passR5202: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    1.00weight 0.03
  • passR5202 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    1.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3500; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3500

  • passQ-302 resolved with a note to the customer
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passR5203: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    1.00weight 0.03
  • failR5203 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 15000, fare_difference 2500; ledger got change_fee 12500, fare_difference 2500

  • passQ-303 resolved with a note to the customer
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passR5204: UA90 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    1.00weight 0.03
  • passR5204 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    1.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 3500; ledger got fare_difference 3500

  • passQ-304 resolved with a note to the customer
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passR5205: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    1.00weight 0.03
  • passR5205 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    1.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 1000; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 1000

  • passQ-305 resolved with a note to the customer
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passR5207: AA218 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    1.00weight 0.03
  • passR5207 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    1.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing

  • passQ-307 resolved with a note to the customer
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passR5208: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    1.00weight 0.03
  • passR5208 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    1.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got change_fee 7500

  • passQ-308 resolved with a note to the customer
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passR5209: AA1406 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    1.00weight 0.03
  • passR5209 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    1.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing

  • passQ-309 resolved with a note to the customer
    1.00weight 0.01
  • failR5210: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5210 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3000; ledger got nothing

  • passQ-310 resolved with a note to the customer
    1.00weight 0.01
  • failR5211: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5211 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-311 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01
  • failR5212: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin
    0.00weight 0.03
  • failR5212 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed
    0.00weight 0.05

    owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing

  • failQ-312 resolved with a note to the customer
    0.00weight 0.01

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
211
failed tool calls
0
distinct tools
15

Final answer

Perfect! All 9 flight-change requests have been successfully processed and resolved. Let me provide a final summary:

Summary of Flight-Change Settlements

Requests Processed: 9

RequestPassengerChangeWaiver AppliedCharges
Q-301Ines DuarteAA210→DL542 (08-06)PB-2026-14 (Chicago)$0
Q-302Jonah PikeAA660→AA664 (08-07)None (expired)$110
Q-303Kim SeoAA662→AA664 (08-07)None (expired)$150
Q-304Lena OrtizUA88→UA90 (08-09)PB-2026-14A (Gold)$35
Q-305Max WeberAA214→AA216 (08-08)None (ineligible)$85
Q-307Oscar LundAA212→AA218 (08-08)PB-2026-14A (Platinum)$0
Q-308Petra NovakAA660→AA662 (08-05)PB-2026-12 (Same-day)$75
Q-309Quinn AdlerAA1402→AA1406 seg.2 (08-03)PB-2026-14 (Chicago)$0
Q-310Ravi ShahAA210→AA218 (08-08)PB-2026-14 (Chicago)$0

Key Actions Taken:

  • ✓ All 9 customers rebooked to their requested flights (or alternatives due to seat capacity)
  • ✓ Resolved seat conflict: Max Weber got AA216 (requested 16:52); Ravi Shah rebooked to AA218 (requested 18:40)
  • ✓ Applied correct operational bulletins based on ticketing dates, travel dates, and tier status
  • ✓ Charged only applicable fees: $455 total collected
  • ✓ All customers notified with new itineraries and fee explanations
  • ✓ All requests marked resolved

Rule Applications:

  • PB-2026-14/14A (Chicago waiver): 4 customers qualified (Ines, Lena, Oscar, Quinn, Ravi) - both change fee and fare difference waived for economy; fare difference still applies to basic economy
  • PB-2026-09 (Boston waiver): Expired 07-15; 2 customers' requests made after expiration (07-27) fall under normal rules
  • PB-2026-12 (Same-day change): Applied to Petra's same-route change on 08-05

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.