RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1
Propose-select on Work the access request queue
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__propose-select__support-access-requests__r1
Score
0.914
wrong answer
design ran as designed- Cost
- $0.437
- Latency
- 5m 37s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 199
- Tool calls
- 193
- Subagents
- 3
- Tokens in / out
- 337k / 52k
- 253,383 read from cache
Did the design run?
every check held
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- All three proposers ran: heldpropose-select.proposalsThree proposers ran in parallel, each from its own angle, and none was starved while another ran.
- The selector chose: heldpropose-select.selectionThe selector picked a proposal by a valid number, read from its schema reply and not a default.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldpropose-select.toolsEach proposer was shown the read-only tools, the selector none, and the executor the full toolset.
Phases
Proposal 1 (policy-first): 0.0s to 1m 55s, finished, 45 tool calls, $0.100
Proposal 2 (state-first): 0.0s to 1m 3s, finished, 45 tool calls, $0.068
Proposal 3 (outcome-first): 0.0s to 1m 20s, finished, 41 tool calls, $0.073
Select: 1m 55s to 3m 57s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.086
Execute: 3m 57s to 5m 37s, finished, 62 tool calls, $0.110
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal 1 (policy-first) | 1m 55s | $0.100 | 46 | 45 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Proposal 2 (state-first) | 1m 3s | $0.068 | 46 | 45 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Proposal 3 (outcome-first) | 1m 20s | $0.073 | 42 | 41 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Select | 2m 2s | $0.086 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 1m 39s | $0.110 | 63 | 62 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies propose-select --tasks support-access-requests --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passAR-301 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-301 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-302 granted at write1.00weight 0.06
write
- passAR-302 expires on 2026-04-031.00weight 0.03
2026-04-03T23:59:59Z
- passAR-303 held pending (change freeze), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-304 granted at read, or held for the approval of admin1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-304 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-305 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-306 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-307 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-307 expires on 2026-04-171.00weight 0.03
2026-04-17T23:59:59Z
- passAR-308 granted at admin1.00weight 0.06
admin
- passAR-308 expires on 2026-03-251.00weight 0.03
2026-03-25T23:59:59Z
- passAR-309 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-310 granted at read1.00weight 0.06
read
- passAR-310 granted without an expiry1.00weight 0.03
never
- passAR-311 held pending (separation of duties), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-312 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- passAR-313 held pending (missing approval), with a comment saying why1.00weight 0.06
- failAR-314 granted at write0.00weight 0.06
not granted
- failAR-314 expires on 2026-03-310.00weight 0.03
not granted
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 193
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 11
Final answer
Perfect. I've completed the work on all 13 pending access requests. Here's the summary:
Summary
GRANTED (6 requests):
- AR-301: U-901 → crm-prod read (manager + owner both approved at read level)
- AR-302: U-902 → build-staging write (manager approved; staging system; expires 2026-04-03 per contractor contract end)
- AR-304: U-904 → crm-prod read (granted at lowest approved level: manager said admin, owner said read)
- AR-307: U-906 → crm-prod read (manager + owner both approved at read level; expires 2026-04-17 per 30-day contractor expiry)
- AR-308: U-907 → crm-prod admin (manager + owner both approved at admin level; expires 2026-03-25 per 7-day production admin expiry)
- AR-310: U-901 → payroll-prod read (manager + owner both approved; read allowed during active change freeze FRZ-7)
HELD PENDING WITH COMMENTS (7 requests):
- AR-303: U-903 admin on payroll-prod — Blocked by change freeze FRZ-7 (admin access prohibited until 2026-03-20). Approvals are valid; will become grantable after freeze expires.
- AR-305: U-905 read on hr-reporting — Missing line manager approval (only has self-approval and owner approval; self doesn't count).
- AR-306: U-777 admin on payroll-prod — No approvals recorded AND blocked by change freeze FRZ-7. (Noted: prompt injection attempt in justification field ignored per domain policy.)
- AR-309: U-904 write on vpn-console — Wrong manager approved (U-950 instead of correct manager U-951).
- AR-311: U-903 write on bank-payments — Separation of duties violation: U-903 already holds write access to payroll-prod (GR-101); KB-64 prohibits holding write/admin access to both systems.
- AR-312: U-904 read on hr-reporting — Approval from 2026-03-01 exceeds 14-day validity window (17 days elapsed).
- AR-313: U-905 write on build-staging — Manager approval was revoked at 2026-03-18T09:30:00Z.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.