ScaffoldBench

RunHaiku 4.5repeat 1

Propose-select on Consolidate duplicate CRM reports

claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__propose-select__support-medium__r1

Score

1.000

passed
design ran as designed
Cost
$0.235
Latency
2m 16s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
52
Tool calls
46
Subagents
3
Tokens in / out
168k / 24k
103,631 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • All three proposers ran: heldpropose-select.proposalsThree proposers ran in parallel, each from its own angle, and none was starved while another ran.
  • The selector chose: heldpropose-select.selectionThe selector picked a proposal by a valid number, read from its schema reply and not a default.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldpropose-select.toolsEach proposer was shown the read-only tools, the selector none, and the executor the full toolset.

Phases

Proposal 1 (policy-first): 0.0s to 56.9s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.050
Proposal 2 (state-first): 0.0s to 46.5s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.047
Proposal 3 (outcome-first): 0.0s to 56.2s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.051
Select: 56.9s to 1m 36s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.035
Execute: 1m 36s to 2m 16s, finished, 14 tool calls, $0.052

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Proposal 1 (policy-first)56.9s$0.0501211claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Proposal 2 (state-first)46.5s$0.047109claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Proposal 3 (outcome-first)56.2s$0.0511312claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Select38.7s$0.03520claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Execute40.5s$0.0521514claude-haiku-4-5-20251001

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies propose-select --tasks support-medium --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passSurvivor carries the earliest SLA deadline of the merged set
    1.00weight 0.23

    sla_due_at=2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (expected 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z)

  • passBoth duplicate reports were merged into the earliest-created ticket
    1.00weight 0.23

    T-1053: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052; T-1054: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052

  • passThe engineering tracking ticket now points at the survivor
    1.00weight 0.15

    T-1061 links=[T-1052]

  • passSurvivor re-graded from the matrix for its widened impact scope
    1.00weight 0.15

    severity=sev2 (matrix says sev2)

  • passSurvivor assigned to the engineer on call for the owning rotation at its deadline
    1.00weight 0.15

    assignee=E-201 (expected E-201)

  • passEvery ticket folded in was read before the merge
    1.00weight 0.08

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
46
failed tool calls
0
distinct tools
9

Final answer

Perfect! The consolidation is complete. Here's a summary of what was done:

Summary

I successfully consolidated the duplicate CRM search issue tickets while respecting all domain policies:

Consolidated Ticket (Survivor)

  • T-1052 "CRM search returns 500 error" is now the single ticket tracking the CRM account search failures

    • Severity: sev2 (raised from sev3 to reflect department-wide impact per escalation matrix)
    • Impact: department (broadest scope from the three merged reports)
    • Assignee: E-201 Ines Kovac (on-call for business-apps rotation at the deadline time)
    • SLA Deadline: 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (earliest deadline from the three merged tickets)
    • Linked Ticket: T-1061 (engineering tracking ticket for the search index rebuild fix)

Merged Tickets

  • T-1053 and T-1054 are now marked as merged into T-1052
  • All three tickets reported identical symptoms: CRM account search returning HTTP 500 errors from ~07:00

Left Unchanged (Different Problems)

  • T-1055: "CRM export to CSV produces an empty file" — different issue (requester confirmed "search works fine for me")
  • T-1061: Internal engineering tracking ticket (not a duplicate report, but solution tracking for linked issues)

Policy Compliance

✅ Merged only reports of the same underlying problem
✅ Selected earliest-created ticket as survivor
✅ Preserved earliest deadline commitment (never moved earlier)
✅ Set severity from escalation matrix (department impact → sev2)
✅ Assigned to engineer on-call for owning rotation at deadline time
✅ Preserved and updated reference links correctly

Revenue Ops now has a single consolidated ticket properly prioritized and assigned to the responsible engineer.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.