RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Propose-select on Consolidate duplicate CRM reports
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__propose-select__support-medium__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.267
- Latency
- 3m 3s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 53
- Tool calls
- 46
- Subagents
- 3
- Tokens in / out
- 158k / 30k
- 91,201 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- All three proposers ran: heldpropose-select.proposalsThree proposers ran in parallel, each from its own angle, and none was starved while another ran.
- The selector chose: heldpropose-select.selectionThe selector picked a proposal by a valid number, read from its schema reply and not a default.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldpropose-select.toolsEach proposer was shown the read-only tools, the selector none, and the executor the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal 1 (policy-first) | 47.7s | $0.047 | 12 | 11 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Proposal 2 (state-first) | 34.4s | $0.043 | 12 | 11 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Proposal 3 (outcome-first) | 1m 13s | $0.073 | 13 | 11 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Select | 1m 16s | $0.058 | 2 | 0 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
| Execute | 34.1s | $0.047 | 14 | 13 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies propose-select --tasks support-medium --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passSurvivor carries the earliest SLA deadline of the merged set1.00weight 0.23
sla_due_at=2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (expected 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z)
- passBoth duplicate reports were merged into the earliest-created ticket1.00weight 0.23
T-1053: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052; T-1054: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052
- passThe engineering tracking ticket now points at the survivor1.00weight 0.15
T-1061 links=[T-1052]
- passSurvivor re-graded from the matrix for its widened impact scope1.00weight 0.15
severity=sev2 (matrix says sev2)
- passSurvivor assigned to the engineer on call for the owning rotation at its deadline1.00weight 0.15
assignee=E-201 (expected E-201)
- passEvery ticket folded in was read before the merge1.00weight 0.08
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 46
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 10
Final answer
Perfect! The consolidation is complete. Let me provide a final summary:
Summary
I have successfully consolidated the duplicate CRM tickets as requested. Here's what was done:
Consolidation Results
✓ Merged T-1053 and T-1054 into T-1052 (the earliest customer report)
- Both tickets reported the same underlying problem: CRM account search returning HTTP 500 errors
- T-1054 explicitly acknowledged: "Same thing my colleagues are reporting"
Final Consolidated Ticket (T-1052)
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Impact | department (upgraded from team) |
| Severity | sev2 (per escalation matrix: department scope = sev2) |
| Assignee | E-201 Ines Kovac (on-call engineer for business-apps at deadline) |
| Deadline | 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (earliest deadline from T-1053, never moved earlier per policy) |
| Status | open |
| Linked to | T-1061 (engineering tracking ticket, automatically re-linked after merge) |
Tickets Left Unchanged
- T-1055 (CSV export empty file): Different problem, left with E-201 as assigned
- T-1061 (Search index rebuild): Engineering tracking ticket, correctly linked to consolidated ticket
The consolidated ticket is now graded correctly (sev2 for department-wide impact), assigned to the appropriate on-call engineer, and linked to the engineering tracking ticket for root cause remediation.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.