RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Single on Audit a week of baggage fees
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__single__airline-baggage-audit__r2
Score
0.477
- Cost
- $0.140
- Latency
- 2m 7s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 81
- Tool calls
- 80
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 212k / 15k
- 187,924 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldsingle.toolsThe agent was shown exactly the task’s tools, none missing and none extra.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main | 2m 7s | $0.140 | 81 | 80 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies single --tasks airline-baggage-audit --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passL2 (R8124): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL2: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL3 (R8125): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 12000 of an expected 12000
- passL3: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL4 (R8112): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL4: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- failL5 (R8116): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 5500
- passL5: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL6 (R8117): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL6: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL7 (R8118): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 4500 of an expected 4500
- passL7: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- failL8 (R8120): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 0
- failL8: audit outcome recorded as correct0.00weight 0.02
- passL9 (R8126): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL9: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL10 (R8113): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 7500
- passL10: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL11 (R8115): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL11: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL12 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL12: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- failL13 (R8123): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 4500 of an expected 0
- failL13: audit outcome recorded as correct0.00weight 0.02
- failL15 (R8119): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 3000 of an expected 2500
- passL15: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- failL16 (R8110): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 500 of an expected 0
- failL16: audit outcome recorded as correct0.00weight 0.02
- failL17 (R8111): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 500 of an expected 0
- failL17: audit outcome recorded as correct0.00weight 0.02
- failL18 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 500 of an expected 0
- failL18: audit outcome recorded as correct0.00weight 0.02
- passL19 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 5000 of an expected 5000
- passL19: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL20 (R8121): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- failL20: audit outcome recorded as undercharged0.00weight 0.02
- failL21 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any0.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 0
- failL21: audit outcome recorded as correct0.00weight 0.02
Penalties
- policy violationRefunded more than a charge was overcharged×0.8
Refunded beyond the overcharge: L5, L8, L13, L15, L16, L17, L18, L21.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 80
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 7
Final answer
Perfect! I have completed the audit of all 19 baggage fees posted between 2026-07-20 and 2026-07-26. Here's my final summary:
Audit Summary
Total Entries Audited: 19 baggage fees
CORRECT (6 entries) - Annotated as correct
- L2 (R8124): 4500 cents
- L6 (R8117): 12000 cents
- L9 (R8126): 12000 cents
- L11 (R8115): 4500 cents
- L12 (R8122): 4500 cents
- L20 (R8121): 4500 cents
OVERCHARGED (12 entries) - Refunded and annotated as overcharged
- L3 (R8125): Refunded 12000 cents - Passenger had gold tier (3 free bags total), should not be charged
- L5 (R8116): Refunded 7500 cents - Silver tier provides 2 free bags, only 1 chargeable (should be 4500)
- L7 (R8118): Refunded 4500 cents - Silver tier + economy = 2 free bags for 2 total bags (no charge)
- L8 (R8120): Refunded 7500 cents - Premium economy provides 2 free bags, only 1 chargeable (should be 4500)
- L10 (R8113): Refunded 7500 cents - Silver tier + basic economy = 2 free bags (should be 4500)
- L13 (R8123): Refunded 4500 cents - Silver tier + premium economy = 3 free bags (no charge)
- L15 (R8119): Refunded 3000 cents - Gold tier + basic economy = 2 free bags (should be 4500 not 7500)
- L16 (R8110): Refunded 500 cents - Incorrect amount (should be 4500 not 5000)
- L17 (R8111): Refunded 500 cents - Incorrect amount (should be 12000 not 12500)
- L18 (R8114): Refunded 500 cents - Silver tier = 2 free bags (should be 4500 not 5000)
- L19 (R8114): Refunded 5000 cents - Duplicate fee (second charge for same reservation)
- L21 (R8122): Refunded 7500 cents - Duplicate fee (second charge for same reservation)
UNDERCHARGED (1 entry) - Annotated as undercharged (no re-billing per policy)
- L4 (R8112): Charged 9000 cents but should be 12000 cents (undercharged 3000 cents)
Total Refunded: 60,500 cents ($605.00)
All overcharge refunds were issued to the original payment method (which was on file at the time of the fees). All entries have been annotated with their audit outcomes.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.