RunHaiku 4.5repeat 2
Single on Triage a new service desk ticket
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001__single__support-easy__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.027
- Latency
- 19.1s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 8
- Tool calls
- 7
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 25k / 1.8k
- 14,467 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldsingle.toolsThe agent was shown exactly the task’s tools, none missing and none extra.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main | 19.1s | $0.027 | 8 | 7 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies single --tasks support-easy --models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passSeverity matches the escalation matrix for the service and impact scope1.00weight 0.27
severity=sev3 (matrix says sev3)
- passSLA deadline is the triage time plus the response target for that severity1.00weight 0.27
sla_due_at=2026-03-17T17:20:00Z (expected 2026-03-17T17:20:00Z)
- passAssigned to the engineer on call for the owning rotation at the deadline1.00weight 0.27
assignee=E-301 (expected E-301)
- passTicket left in status open1.00weight 0.09
- passEscalation matrix read before the severity was set1.00weight 0.09
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 7
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 7
Final answer
Task Complete
I have successfully triaged ticket T-1041:
Severity: Set to sev3
- Based on the escalation matrix: VPN service with team impact scope (9 people affected) requires sev3
Deadline: Set to 2026-03-17T17:20:00Z
- sev3 requires a 480-minute response target
- Current time: 2026-03-17T09:20:00Z + 480 minutes = 2026-03-17T17:20:00Z
Assigned to: E-301 Yuki Sato
- The VPN service is owned by the network-primary rotation
- Yuki Sato is the on-call engineer for network-primary at the deadline time
- Ticket status changed from "new" to "open" upon assignment
The ticket for the Berlin sales team's VPN outage is now properly triaged and in the hands of the responsible engineer.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.