RunOpus 5.5repeat 2
Gated-execute on Audit a week of baggage fees
claude-opus-5-5__gated-execute__airline-baggage-audit__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $1.87
- Latency
- 6m 30s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 334
- Tool calls
- 283
- Subagents
- 25
- Tokens in / out
- 1.2M / 34k
- 1,022,905 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
- Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute | 6m 30s | $0.411 | 98 | 97 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 1: refund_fee | 19.9s | $0.048 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 2: refund_fee | 12.9s | $0.048 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 3: refund_fee | 17.8s | $0.068 | 13 | 11 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 4: refund_fee | 15.2s | $0.075 | 13 | 11 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 5: refund_fee | 16.5s | $0.080 | 13 | 11 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 6: refund_fee | 12.8s | $0.065 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 7: annotate_ledger_entry | 10.3s | $0.052 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 8: annotate_ledger_entry | 11.4s | $0.053 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 9: annotate_ledger_entry | 11.8s | $0.059 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 10: annotate_ledger_entry | 10.3s | $0.053 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 11: annotate_ledger_entry | 9.9s | $0.050 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 12: annotate_ledger_entry | 9.7s | $0.051 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 13: annotate_ledger_entry | 9.7s | $0.053 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 14: annotate_ledger_entry | 12.3s | $0.060 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 15: annotate_ledger_entry | 10.1s | $0.053 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 16: annotate_ledger_entry | 12.1s | $0.070 | 12 | 10 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 17: annotate_ledger_entry | 16.2s | $0.055 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 18: annotate_ledger_entry | 12.2s | $0.057 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 19: annotate_ledger_entry | 10.2s | $0.058 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 20: annotate_ledger_entry | 10.0s | $0.058 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 21: annotate_ledger_entry | 11.2s | $0.061 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 22: annotate_ledger_entry | 10.8s | $0.061 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 23: annotate_ledger_entry | 16.5s | $0.048 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 24: annotate_ledger_entry | 13.2s | $0.055 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 25: annotate_ledger_entry | 12.9s | $0.064 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks airline-baggage-audit --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passL2 (R8124): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL2: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL3 (R8125): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 12000 of an expected 12000
- passL3: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL4 (R8112): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL4: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL5 (R8116): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 5500 of an expected 5500
- passL5: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL6 (R8117): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL6: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL7 (R8118): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 4500 of an expected 4500
- passL7: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL8 (R8120): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL8: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL9 (R8126): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL9: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL10 (R8113): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 7500
- passL10: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL11 (R8115): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL11: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL12 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL12: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL13 (R8123): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL13: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL15 (R8119): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 2500 of an expected 2500
- passL15: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL16 (R8110): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL16: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL17 (R8111): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL17: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL18 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL18: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL19 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 5000 of an expected 5000
- passL19: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL20 (R8121): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL20: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL21 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL21: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 283
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 12
Final answer
I audited all 19 baggage fees posted from 2026-07-20 through 2026-07-26 and recorded an outcome on each one. Six were overcharged and are now refunded, two were undercharged, and 11 were correct.
How I judged them: Each fee was checked against the rules on the day it was posted, using the passenger's tier and cabin on that date. The free allowance is set by cabin (basic economy 0, economy 1, premium economy and business 2), plus 1 for silver and 2 for gold or platinum. From 2026-07-23 an operations bulletin (PB-2026-13) raised the first paid bag from $45 to $50; each further paid bag stayed at $75. The published baggage rules table hasn't been updated with the new price yet.
Overcharged, refunded to the original payment method:
| Entry | Reservation | Why | Should have been | Charged | Refunded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L3 | R8125 | Passenger was still gold on 07-20 (dropped a tier 07-21), so all 3 bags were free | $0 | $120 | $120 |
| L5 | R8116 | Economy + silver = 2 free bags, 1 paid bag | $45 | $120 | $55 |
| L7 | R8118 | Economy + silver = 2 free bags | $0 | $45 | $45 |
| L10 | R8113 | Basic economy + silver = 1 free bag, 1 paid bag | $45 | $120 | $75 |
| L15 | R8119 | Basic economy + gold = 2 free bags, 1 paid bag at the new price | $50 | $75 | $25 |
| L19 | R8114 | Second charge for the same bags as L18 | — | $50 | $50 (all of it) |
- R8116: the overcharge was $75, but another agent had already given a $20 courtesy refund on 07-27, so I refunded the remaining $55.
Undercharged, recorded but not billed (the rules forbid re-billing):
- L4 (R8112): should have been $120; $90 was charged.
- L20 (R8121): should have been $50 at the new price; $45 was charged.
Correct: L2, L6, L8, L9, L11, L12, L13, L16, L17, L18, L21. Three of these could look wrong at first:
- Tier or cabin changes: for L6, L8, L9 and L13 the passenger's tier or cabin changed after the fee was posted. The fee matches what they were on the day it was charged.
- L21 (R8122): this is a charge for a different, third bag added later, not a repeat of L12. It is correctly priced at $75 as their second paid bag.
One thing to check: before the refunds, I looked up the payment method on each of the six reservations and the system said "no payment instrument on file" for all of them. The audit rules require refunds to the original payment method, and the refund tool accepted all six without error, so I went ahead. Finance may want to confirm the money actually reaches these customers. If it can't, the handbook's fallback is to issue the amount as travel credit.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.