RunOpus 5.5repeat 1
Gated-execute on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-opus-5-5__gated-execute__airline-irrops-reprotect__r1
Score
1.000
passed
design ran as designed- Cost
- $3.30
- Latency
- 11m 11s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 492
- Tool calls
- 415
- Subagents
- 38
- Tokens in / out
- 1.7M / 63k
- 1,387,181 read from cache
Did the design run?
every check held
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
- Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.
Phases
Execute: 0.0s to 11m 11s, finished, 83 tool calls, $0.556
Review 1: change_flight: 52.9s to 1m 11s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.111
Review 2: change_flight: 1m 14s to 1m 41s, finished, 28 tool calls, $0.129
Review 3: change_flight: 1m 43s to 2m 22s, finished, 25 tool calls, $0.126
Review 4: change_flight: 2m 25s to 2m 51s, finished, 23 tool calls, $0.128
Review 5: change_flight: 2m 56s to 3m 40s, finished, 26 tool calls, $0.145
Review 6: change_flight: 3m 40s to 3m 56s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.070
Review 7: change_flight: 3m 59s to 4m 18s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.076
Review 8: change_flight: 4m 23s to 4m 56s, finished, 21 tool calls, $0.141
Review 9: change_flight: 4m 56s to 5m 12s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.073
Review 10: change_flight: 5m 14s to 5m 41s, finished, 19 tool calls, $0.120
Review 11: change_flight: 5m 41s to 5m 58s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.049
Review 12: change_flight: 5m 58s to 6m 23s, finished, 18 tool calls, $0.110
Review 13: change_flight: 6m 29s to 6m 46s, finished, 13 tool calls, $0.085
Review 14: change_flight: 6m 46s to 7m 4s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.088
Review 15: change_flight: 7m 4s to 7m 16s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.055
Review 16: issue_voucher: 7m 19s to 7m 27s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.042
Review 17: issue_voucher: 7m 27s to 7m 40s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.054
Review 18: issue_voucher: 7m 40s to 7m 47s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.036
Review 19: issue_voucher: 7m 47s to 8m 0s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.059
Review 20: issue_voucher: 8m 0s to 8m 7s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.035
Review 21: issue_voucher: 8m 7s to 8m 17s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.047
Review 22: issue_voucher: 8m 17s to 8m 25s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.045
Review 23: issue_voucher: 8m 25s to 8m 32s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.041
Review 24: issue_voucher: 8m 32s to 8m 40s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.044
Review 25: issue_voucher: 8m 40s to 8m 48s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.042
Review 26: notify_passenger: 8m 52s to 8m 59s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.042
Review 27: notify_passenger: 8m 59s to 9m 13s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.065
Review 28: notify_passenger: 9m 13s to 9m 21s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.051
Review 29: notify_passenger: 9m 21s to 9m 27s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.044
Review 30: notify_passenger: 9m 27s to 9m 48s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.102
Review 31: notify_passenger: 9m 48s to 9m 54s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.046
Review 32: notify_passenger: 9m 54s to 10m 5s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.071
Review 33: notify_passenger: 10m 5s to 10m 15s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.060
Review 34: notify_passenger: 10m 15s to 10m 23s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.053
Review 35: notify_passenger: 10m 23s to 10m 31s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.058
Review 36: notify_passenger: 10m 31s to 10m 38s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.057
Review 37: notify_passenger: 10m 38s to 10m 45s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.058
Review 38: notify_passenger: 10m 45s to 10m 58s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.086
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute | 11m 11s | $0.556 | 84 | 83 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 1: change_flight | 18.6s | $0.111 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 2: change_flight | 27.4s | $0.129 | 30 | 28 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 3: change_flight | 39.5s | $0.126 | 27 | 25 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 4: change_flight | 26.5s | $0.128 | 25 | 23 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 5: change_flight | 44.0s | $0.145 | 28 | 26 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 6: change_flight | 16.2s | $0.070 | 12 | 10 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 7: change_flight | 19.1s | $0.076 | 12 | 10 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 8: change_flight | 32.9s | $0.141 | 23 | 21 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 9: change_flight | 15.9s | $0.073 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 10: change_flight | 27.1s | $0.120 | 21 | 19 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 11: change_flight | 16.7s | $0.049 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 12: change_flight | 24.7s | $0.110 | 20 | 18 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 13: change_flight | 17.2s | $0.085 | 15 | 13 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 14: change_flight | 18.2s | $0.088 | 14 | 12 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 15: change_flight | 11.4s | $0.055 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 16: issue_voucher | 8.6s | $0.042 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 17: issue_voucher | 12.4s | $0.054 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 18: issue_voucher | 7.5s | $0.036 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 19: issue_voucher | 13.0s | $0.059 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 20: issue_voucher | 7.1s | $0.035 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 21: issue_voucher | 9.3s | $0.047 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 22: issue_voucher | 8.1s | $0.045 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 23: issue_voucher | 7.4s | $0.041 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 24: issue_voucher | 8.2s | $0.044 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 25: issue_voucher | 7.9s | $0.042 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 26: notify_passenger | 7.3s | $0.042 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 27: notify_passenger | 13.7s | $0.065 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 28: notify_passenger | 8.0s | $0.051 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 29: notify_passenger | 6.6s | $0.044 | 4 | 2 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 30: notify_passenger | 20.8s | $0.102 | 11 | 9 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 31: notify_passenger | 6.0s | $0.046 | 4 | 2 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 32: notify_passenger | 11.2s | $0.071 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 33: notify_passenger | 9.9s | $0.060 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 34: notify_passenger | 7.4s | $0.053 | 4 | 2 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 35: notify_passenger | 8.5s | $0.058 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 36: notify_passenger | 6.5s | $0.057 | 4 | 2 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 37: notify_passenger | 7.1s | $0.058 | 4 | 2 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 38: notify_passenger | 12.9s | $0.086 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on DL512 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 15000, hotel 0; issued compensation 15000
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 24000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 24000, hotel 18000
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- passR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 0; issued compensation 30000
- passR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in premium_economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in business; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 415
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 14
Final answer
I've moved all 13 passengers from the cancelled AA918 onto new flights, issued the vouchers they're owed and sent each of them one message with their new itinerary. Nobody was charged a change fee or fare difference, and no refunds were needed.
Something to check: the system date is 2026-10-05, but AA918 was due to fly on 2026-08-03, two months ago. You asked for this re-protection and the system accepted every change, so I went ahead. Someone should still confirm it wasn't meant to happen before the travel date.
How I ordered passengers: there are no bulletins in effect, so the standard rules applied. I went by tier (platinum, then gold, then silver, then none), then by earliest booking date. Each passenger got the soonest arrival still open in their own cabin.
| Order | Reservation | Passenger (tier) | New itinerary | Late by | Vouchers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R6103 | Chloe Park (Platinum), business | UA88, 3 Aug, 06:15 to 12:25 | arrives early | none |
| 2 | R6109 | Iris Vance (Platinum), economy | UA88, 3 Aug, in premium economy (upgrade) | arrives early | none |
| 3 | R6110 + R6111 | Jun Takeda / Kofi Mensah (group G-7, ranked as Gold), economy | AA204, 3 Aug, 09:05 to 15:15, together | 1h35 | none |
| 4 | R6102 | Ben Okafor (Gold), economy | DL512, 3 Aug, 12:30 to 18:40 | 5h00 | $150 compensation |
| 5 | R6106 | Farid Haddad (Gold), basic economy | UA88, 3 Aug | arrives early | none |
| 6 | R6112 | Lea Sorensen (Gold), premium economy | AA204, 3 Aug, in business (upgrade) | 1h35 | none |
| 7 | R6104 | Dev Mehta (Silver), economy, to Boston | AA210, 3 Aug, 17:40 to 23:50, then AA1410, 4 Aug, 09:00 to 12:25 Boston | 17h30 | $300 compensation + $180 hotel |
| 8 | R6113 | Mo Farah (Silver), economy, to Boston | same as Dev | 17h30 | $300 compensation + $180 hotel |
| 9 | R6108 | Hugo Brandt (Silver), economy | AA210, 3 Aug, 17:40 to 23:50 | 10h10 | $300 compensation |
| 10 | R6107 | Grace Liu (no tier), economy | AA206, 4 Aug, 09:05 to 15:15 | 25h35 | $240 compensation (capped at her $240 fare) + $180 hotel |
| 11 | R6101 | Ana Ruiz (no tier), economy | AA206, 4 Aug | 25h35 | $300 compensation + $180 hotel |
| 12 | R6105 | Elena Fox (no tier), basic economy | AA204, 3 Aug, 09:05 to 15:15 | 1h35 | none |
- Upgrades: only Iris and Lea moved up, each by one cabin. Each is Gold or Platinum, travelling alone on a single flight. Their own cabin was full on a flight that arrives sooner than anything still open in that cabin.
- No upgrade for Ben: he qualifies by tier, but premium economy was already full on both earlier flights, so he stayed in economy.
- Group G-7: Jun and Kofi stayed together in economy, with no upgrade.
- Boston connections: Dev and Mo could no longer make their original AA1402 connection, so both legs were rebooked. The overnight connection on the morning of 4 Aug counts as valid.
- Hotel vouchers: these went to the four passengers who now arrive a day later than planned: Dev, Mo, Grace and Ana.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.