RunOpus 5.5repeat 1
Gated-execute on Share two short deliveries out among backorders
claude-opus-5-5__gated-execute__ecommerce-backorder-allocation__r1
Score
1.000
passed
design ran as designed- Cost
- $2.52
- Latency
- 8m 41s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 356
- Tool calls
- 288
- Subagents
- 32
- Tokens in / out
- 1.3M / 48k
- 1,038,846 read from cache
Did the design run?
every check held
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
- Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.
Phases
Execute: 0.0s to 8m 41s, finished, 78 tool calls, $0.502
Review 1: allocate_stock: 38.1s to 50.3s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.086
Review 2: allocate_stock: 50.3s to 1m 3s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.060
Review 3: allocate_stock: 1m 3s to 1m 20s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.076
Review 4: allocate_stock: 1m 20s to 1m 33s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.050
Review 5: allocate_stock: 1m 33s to 1m 48s, finished, 14 tool calls, $0.078
Review 6: allocate_stock: 1m 48s to 2m 21s, finished, 18 tool calls, $0.126
Review 7: allocate_stock: 2m 33s to 2m 44s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.046
Review 8: allocate_stock: 2m 44s to 3m 5s, finished, 14 tool calls, $0.095
Review 9: allocate_stock: 3m 15s to 3m 33s, finished, 15 tool calls, $0.090
Review 10: allocate_stock: 3m 33s to 3m 47s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.070
Review 11: set_promise_date: 3m 54s to 4m 7s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.057
Review 12: set_promise_date: 4m 7s to 4m 25s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.078
Review 13: set_promise_date: 4m 25s to 4m 39s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.061
Review 14: set_promise_date: 4m 39s to 4m 58s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.088
Review 15: set_promise_date: 4m 58s to 5m 26s, finished, 14 tool calls, $0.113
Review 16: allocate_stock: 5m 32s to 5m 53s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.092
Review 17: allocate_stock: 5m 55s to 6m 8s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.060
Review 18: allocate_stock: 6m 10s to 6m 26s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.070
Review 19: notify_customer: 6m 32s to 6m 38s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.032
Review 20: notify_customer: 6m 38s to 6m 46s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.037
Review 21: notify_customer: 6m 46s to 6m 55s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.045
Review 22: notify_customer: 6m 55s to 7m 4s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.038
Review 23: notify_customer: 7m 4s to 7m 11s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.036
Review 24: notify_customer: 7m 11s to 7m 19s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.044
Review 25: notify_customer: 7m 19s to 7m 26s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.036
Review 26: notify_customer: 7m 26s to 7m 33s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.044
Review 27: notify_customer: 7m 34s to 7m 43s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.055
Review 28: notify_customer: 7m 43s to 7m 52s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.049
Review 29: notify_customer: 7m 52s to 7m 58s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.038
Review 30: notify_customer: 7m 58s to 8m 8s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.048
Review 31: notify_customer: 8m 8s to 8m 18s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.060
Review 32: notify_customer: 8m 18s to 8m 30s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.061
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute | 8m 41s | $0.502 | 79 | 78 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 1: allocate_stock | 12.1s | $0.086 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 2: allocate_stock | 12.3s | $0.060 | 11 | 9 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 3: allocate_stock | 17.2s | $0.076 | 14 | 12 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 4: allocate_stock | 13.2s | $0.050 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 5: allocate_stock | 15.4s | $0.078 | 16 | 14 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 6: allocate_stock | 32.8s | $0.126 | 20 | 18 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 7: allocate_stock | 10.3s | $0.046 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 8: allocate_stock | 21.9s | $0.095 | 16 | 14 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 9: allocate_stock | 18.0s | $0.090 | 17 | 15 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 10: allocate_stock | 14.1s | $0.070 | 13 | 11 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 11: set_promise_date | 12.5s | $0.057 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 12: set_promise_date | 17.9s | $0.078 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 13: set_promise_date | 13.8s | $0.061 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 14: set_promise_date | 19.8s | $0.088 | 12 | 10 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 15: set_promise_date | 27.8s | $0.113 | 16 | 14 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 16: allocate_stock | 21.3s | $0.092 | 14 | 12 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 17: allocate_stock | 12.7s | $0.060 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 18: allocate_stock | 16.5s | $0.070 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 19: notify_customer | 6.6s | $0.032 | 3 | 1 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 20: notify_customer | 7.6s | $0.037 | 3 | 1 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 21: notify_customer | 9.5s | $0.045 | 4 | 2 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 22: notify_customer | 8.4s | $0.038 | 3 | 1 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 23: notify_customer | 6.7s | $0.036 | 3 | 1 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 24: notify_customer | 8.0s | $0.044 | 4 | 2 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 25: notify_customer | 7.0s | $0.036 | 3 | 1 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 26: notify_customer | 7.9s | $0.044 | 4 | 2 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 27: notify_customer | 9.8s | $0.055 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 28: notify_customer | 9.1s | $0.049 | 4 | 2 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 29: notify_customer | 6.0s | $0.038 | 3 | 1 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 30: notify_customer | 9.4s | $0.048 | 4 | 2 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 31: notify_customer | 10.0s | $0.060 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 32: notify_customer | 12.0s | $0.061 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks ecommerce-backorder-allocation --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passO-5201 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5201: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5202 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending L2=pending
- passO-5202: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5203 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5203: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5204 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5204: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5206 left waiting, with a promise date1.00weight 0.05
L1=backordered@2026-08-14 L2=backordered@2026-08-14 L3=pending
- passO-5206 waiting lines promised for the date the in-transit supply gives them1.00weight 0.03
expected L1@2026-08-14, L2@2026-08-14
- passO-5206: customer told once, with the promised date1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5207 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending L2=pending
- passO-5207: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5208 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5208: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5209 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5209: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5210 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending L2=pending
- passO-5210: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5211 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending L2=shipped
- passO-5211: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5212 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5212: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5213 left waiting, with a promise date1.00weight 0.05
L1=backordered@2026-08-14
- passO-5213 waiting lines promised for the date the in-transit supply gives them1.00weight 0.03
expected L1@2026-08-14
- passO-5213: customer told once, with the promised date1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5214 left waiting, with a promise date1.00weight 0.05
L1=backordered@2026-08-19
- passO-5214 waiting lines promised for the date the in-transit supply gives them1.00weight 0.03
expected L1@2026-08-19
- passO-5214: customer told once, with the promised date1.00weight 0.01
- passO-5215 allocated from the delivery1.00weight 0.05
L1=pending
- passO-5215: customer told once that the order is allocated1.00weight 0.01
- passBoth deliveries were allocated in full1.00weight 0.03
P-DOC stock=0, P-MON stock=0
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 288
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 13
Final answer
I've worked all the laptop dock and monitor backorders. 11 orders now have their stock reserved and are ready to ship, 3 have promise dates, and every one of those 14 customers has had a single notice.
Two things changed while I worked:
- Two more deliveries came in. PO-91 (4 docks) and PO-93 (3 monitors) were also received today, so there were 11 docks and 7 monitors to give out, not 7 and 4. I gave out all of it under the same rules. That also meant the earlier PO-91 and PO-93 arrival dates could no longer be used as promise dates.
- The store's date is 2026-07-25, not the 2026-10-05 in my instructions. I used the store's date. The newer policy update (PU-12, "aged backorders go first") is in force, so orders placed on or before 07-11 went first, oldest first, whatever the customer's tier. The other update (PU-9, gold ranked with platinum) only covered June, so I didn't apply it.
Priority order: first the aged orders O-5201, O-5202, O-5203 and O-5204. Then platinum (O-5206, O-5207), gold (O-5208, O-5209, O-5210) and standard (O-5211 to O-5215), oldest first within each tier.
Stock reserved (now ready to ship): O-5201, O-5202 (dock and monitor), O-5203, O-5204, O-5207, O-5208, O-5209, O-5210, O-5211, O-5212, O-5215. O-5207 is set to ship complete, so I reserved its dock and monitor together. Both products are now at zero on the shelf.
Still waiting, with promise dates:
| Order | Waiting for | Promised | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| O-5206 | Dock and USB-C hub | 2026-08-14 | Set to ship complete, and there are no hubs in stock. The hub would come on 08-06 and the dock with PO-95 on 08-14, so both lines get the later date. |
| O-5213 | 2 docks | 2026-08-14 | From PO-95 |
| O-5214 | 1 monitor | 2026-08-19 | From PO-97 |
Not touched: O-5205 is on risk hold, so I gave it no stock, no promise date and no message.
Reviewer denials:
- I tried twice to reserve monitors for O-5203 before PO-93 arrived, and the reviewer refused both times. Its reasons ranked the customer by tier and didn't apply PU-12. I didn't go along with that: I left the monitors unreserved rather than give them to O-5208 out of turn. Once PO-93 arrived, the reviewer applied PU-12 itself and O-5203 was reserved first, as the policy requires.
- My promise date for O-5212 was refused because PO-93 had already arrived. O-5212 got the last monitor in stock instead.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.