ScaffoldBench

RunOpus 5.5repeat 2

Gated-execute on Share two short deliveries out among backorders

claude-opus-5-5__gated-execute__ecommerce-backorder-allocation__r2

Score

1.000

passed
design ran as designed
Cost
$2.56
Latency
9m 1s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
370
Tool calls
299
Subagents
33
Tokens in / out
1.3M / 48k
1,055,984 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
  • Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.

Phases

Execute: 0.0s to 9m 1s, finished, 78 tool calls, $0.513
Review 1: allocate_stock: 37.1s to 48.3s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.083
Review 2: allocate_stock: 48.3s to 1m 15s, finished, 23 tool calls, $0.117
Review 3: allocate_stock: 1m 15s to 1m 43s, finished, 21 tool calls, $0.112
Review 4: allocate_stock: 1m 43s to 2m 5s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.090
Review 5: allocate_stock: 2m 21s to 2m 42s, finished, 12 tool calls, $0.082
Review 6: allocate_stock: 2m 44s to 2m 58s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.053
Review 7: allocate_stock: 3m 7s to 3m 33s, finished, 13 tool calls, $0.086
Review 8: allocate_stock: 3m 33s to 3m 48s, finished, 13 tool calls, $0.076
Review 9: allocate_stock: 3m 48s to 4m 9s, finished, 14 tool calls, $0.098
Review 10: allocate_stock: 4m 11s to 4m 26s, finished, 13 tool calls, $0.082
Review 11: set_promise_date: 4m 33s to 4m 50s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.076
Review 12: set_promise_date: 4m 50s to 5m 3s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.048
Review 13: set_promise_date: 5m 3s to 5m 16s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.065
Review 14: set_promise_date: 5m 16s to 5m 35s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.055
Review 15: set_promise_date: 5m 35s to 5m 54s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.072
Review 16: set_promise_date: 5m 54s to 6m 11s, finished, 11 tool calls, $0.078
Review 17: allocate_stock: 6m 16s to 6m 30s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.059
Review 18: allocate_stock: 6m 32s to 6m 44s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.056
Review 19: allocate_stock: 6m 44s to 6m 54s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.056
Review 20: notify_customer: 7m 1s to 7m 8s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.034
Review 21: notify_customer: 7m 8s to 7m 14s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.034
Review 22: notify_customer: 7m 14s to 7m 24s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.034
Review 23: notify_customer: 7m 24s to 7m 31s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.034
Review 24: notify_customer: 7m 31s to 7m 45s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.064
Review 25: notify_customer: 7m 45s to 7m 51s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.037
Review 26: notify_customer: 7m 51s to 7m 57s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.036
Review 27: notify_customer: 7m 57s to 8m 3s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.037
Review 28: notify_customer: 8m 3s to 8m 10s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.047
Review 29: notify_customer: 8m 10s to 8m 16s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.039
Review 30: notify_customer: 8m 16s to 8m 22s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.040
Review 31: notify_customer: 8m 22s to 8m 35s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.068
Review 32: notify_customer: 8m 35s to 8m 45s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.056
Review 33: notify_customer: 8m 45s to 8m 51s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.042

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Execute9m 1s$0.5137978claude-opus-5-5
Review 1: allocate_stock11.2s$0.083108claude-opus-5-5
Review 2: allocate_stock26.5s$0.1172523claude-opus-5-5
Review 3: allocate_stock28.1s$0.1122321claude-opus-5-5
Review 4: allocate_stock21.7s$0.0901311claude-opus-5-5
Review 5: allocate_stock20.6s$0.0821412claude-opus-5-5
Review 6: allocate_stock13.7s$0.053108claude-opus-5-5
Review 7: allocate_stock26.0s$0.0861513claude-opus-5-5
Review 8: allocate_stock15.3s$0.0761513claude-opus-5-5
Review 9: allocate_stock20.8s$0.0981614claude-opus-5-5
Review 10: allocate_stock15.6s$0.0821513claude-opus-5-5
Review 11: set_promise_date17.0s$0.07686claude-opus-5-5
Review 12: set_promise_date12.8s$0.04853claude-opus-5-5
Review 13: set_promise_date12.9s$0.065119claude-opus-5-5
Review 14: set_promise_date18.8s$0.05575claude-opus-5-5
Review 15: set_promise_date19.7s$0.0721210claude-opus-5-5
Review 16: set_promise_date16.1s$0.0781311claude-opus-5-5
Review 17: allocate_stock14.3s$0.05986claude-opus-5-5
Review 18: allocate_stock11.7s$0.05686claude-opus-5-5
Review 19: allocate_stock10.4s$0.05686claude-opus-5-5
Review 20: notify_customer6.7s$0.03431claude-opus-5-5
Review 21: notify_customer5.9s$0.03431claude-opus-5-5
Review 22: notify_customer10.2s$0.03431claude-opus-5-5
Review 23: notify_customer7.1s$0.03431claude-opus-5-5
Review 24: notify_customer14.2s$0.06486claude-opus-5-5
Review 25: notify_customer6.2s$0.03731claude-opus-5-5
Review 26: notify_customer5.4s$0.03631claude-opus-5-5
Review 27: notify_customer5.7s$0.03731claude-opus-5-5
Review 28: notify_customer7.6s$0.04742claude-opus-5-5
Review 29: notify_customer6.1s$0.03931claude-opus-5-5
Review 30: notify_customer5.9s$0.04031claude-opus-5-5
Review 31: notify_customer13.1s$0.06875claude-opus-5-5
Review 32: notify_customer9.8s$0.05664claude-opus-5-5
Review 33: notify_customer6.0s$0.04231claude-opus-5-5

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks ecommerce-backorder-allocation --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passO-5201 allocated from the delivery
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=pending

  • passO-5201: customer told once that the order is allocated
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5202 allocated from the delivery
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=pending L2=pending

  • passO-5202: customer told once that the order is allocated
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5203 allocated from the delivery
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=pending

  • passO-5203: customer told once that the order is allocated
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5204 allocated from the delivery
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=pending

  • passO-5204: customer told once that the order is allocated
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5206 left waiting, with a promise date
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=backordered@2026-08-14 L2=backordered@2026-08-14 L3=pending

  • passO-5206 waiting lines promised for the date the in-transit supply gives them
    1.00weight 0.03

    expected L1@2026-08-14, L2@2026-08-14

  • passO-5206: customer told once, with the promised date
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5207 allocated from the delivery
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=pending L2=pending

  • passO-5207: customer told once that the order is allocated
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5208 allocated from the delivery
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=pending

  • passO-5208: customer told once that the order is allocated
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5209 allocated from the delivery
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=pending

  • passO-5209: customer told once that the order is allocated
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5210 allocated from the delivery
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=pending L2=pending

  • passO-5210: customer told once that the order is allocated
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5211 allocated from the delivery
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=pending L2=shipped

  • passO-5211: customer told once that the order is allocated
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5212 allocated from the delivery
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=pending

  • passO-5212: customer told once that the order is allocated
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5213 left waiting, with a promise date
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=backordered@2026-08-14

  • passO-5213 waiting lines promised for the date the in-transit supply gives them
    1.00weight 0.03

    expected L1@2026-08-14

  • passO-5213: customer told once, with the promised date
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5214 left waiting, with a promise date
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=backordered@2026-08-19

  • passO-5214 waiting lines promised for the date the in-transit supply gives them
    1.00weight 0.03

    expected L1@2026-08-19

  • passO-5214: customer told once, with the promised date
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passO-5215 allocated from the delivery
    1.00weight 0.05

    L1=pending

  • passO-5215: customer told once that the order is allocated
    1.00weight 0.01
  • passBoth deliveries were allocated in full
    1.00weight 0.03

    P-DOC stock=0, P-MON stock=0

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
299
failed tool calls
0
distinct tools
11

Final answer

I've worked all the dock and monitor backorders. Fifteen backordered lines were allocated from stock, four still waiting have promise dates, and 14 customers have had one notice each. Order O-5205 is on risk hold and was left alone, with no allocation, promise date or notice.

Two more deliveries arrived while I was working. PO-91 (4 docks) and PO-93 (3 monitors) were received on 2026-07-25 as well. I included them, so 11 docks and 7 monitors were shared out. All stock of both is now allocated.

Priority rules. The store system's date is 2026-07-25, not 2026-10-06 as my environment shows, so I worked to the store date. Policy update PU-12 has been in force since 1 July. It puts orders placed 14 or more days before allocation (on or before 11 July) at the front, oldest first, whatever the customer's tier. After that come platinum, gold, then standard, earliest order first within each tier. PU-9, which ranked gold with platinum, ran only through 30 June, so I didn't apply it.

The reviewer disagreed with me twice. Both times it denied allocating monitors to O-5203 (standard tier, placed 8 July) and wanted them to go first to O-5208 (gold), ranking by tier and ignoring PU-12. Under PU-12, O-5203 comes first because it is an aged order. I didn't give its monitors to O-5208. Once PO-93 arrived there were enough monitors for both, and the allocation went through. You may want to tell whoever runs the reviewer that it isn't applying PU-12.

Allocated (ready to ship):

  • Docks: O-5201 (2), O-5202 (1), O-5204 (2), O-5207 (1), O-5209 (2), O-5210 (1), O-5211 (1), O-5215 (1).
  • Monitors: O-5202 (1), O-5203 (2), O-5207 (1), O-5208 (2), O-5212 (1).
  • O-5207 must ship complete. Its dock and monitor were allocated together.

Still waiting, with promise dates:

  • O-5206: must ship complete, and its USB-C hub has no stock. The hub is due on PO-90 (6 August) and the dock on PO-95 (14 August), so both lines are promised for 2026-08-14.
  • O-5213: 2 docks are next in line after every dock in stock was allocated. They're promised for 2026-08-14 (PO-95).
  • O-5214: 1 monitor, promised for 2026-08-19 (PO-97).

Customer notices: Each customer above got one email. Eleven orders were told they're ready to ship, and O-5206, O-5213 and O-5214 were given their promise dates.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.