ScaffoldBench

RunOpus 5.5repeat 1

Gated-execute on Consolidate duplicate CRM reports

claude-opus-5-5__gated-execute__support-medium__r1

Score

1.000

passed
design ran as designed
Cost
$0.261
Latency
1m 10s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
45
Tool calls
36
Subagents
4
Tokens in / out
115k / 5.1k
91,813 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
  • Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.

Phases

Execute: 0.0s to 1m 10s, finished, 14 tool calls, $0.087
Review 1: merge_tickets: 9.9s to 25.6s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.043
Review 2: set_severity: 27.0s to 36.4s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.035
Review 3: assign_ticket: 36.4s to 48.4s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.044
Review 4: post_comment: 52.0s to 1m 4s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.052

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Execute1m 10s$0.0871514claude-opus-5-5
Review 1: merge_tickets15.7s$0.04375claude-opus-5-5
Review 2: set_severity9.4s$0.03564claude-opus-5-5
Review 3: assign_ticket12.1s$0.04486claude-opus-5-5
Review 4: post_comment12.2s$0.05297claude-opus-5-5

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks support-medium --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passSurvivor carries the earliest SLA deadline of the merged set
    1.00weight 0.23

    sla_due_at=2026-03-17T12:40:00Z (expected 2026-03-17T12:40:00Z)

  • passBoth duplicate reports were merged into the earliest-created ticket
    1.00weight 0.23

    T-1053: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052; T-1054: status=merged, merged_into=T-1052

  • passThe engineering tracking ticket now points at the survivor
    1.00weight 0.15

    T-1061 links=[T-1052]

  • passSurvivor re-graded from the matrix for its widened impact scope
    1.00weight 0.15

    severity=sev2 (matrix says sev2)

  • passSurvivor assigned to the engineer on call for the owning rotation at its deadline
    1.00weight 0.15

    assignee=E-201 (expected E-201)

  • passEvery ticket folded in was read before the merge
    1.00weight 0.08

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
36
failed tool calls
0
distinct tools
10

Final answer

I merged the three reports of the CRM account search outage into one ticket, T-1052. It's now graded sev2 and assigned to Ines Kovac (E-201).

Merged: T-1053 and T-1054 went into T-1052. All three describe account search failing with an HTTP 500 server error on every query. T-1052 kept the ticket because it was reported first (07:05Z).

  • Deadline: 2026-03-17T12:40Z. That was the earliest deadline already promised on any of the three (it came from T-1053), so I kept it rather than T-1052's original 15:05Z.
  • Severity: sev2. The merged ticket took on T-1053's wider impact (the whole department), and the escalation matrix says department-wide CRM problems are sev2.
  • Assignee: E-201 Ines Kovac. She's on call for business-apps, the team that owns CRM, when the 12:40Z deadline falls. T-1053 had been assigned to E-202 Tomas Lindqvist, but he isn't the one on call then, so I didn't keep him.
  • Notes: I added a comment to T-1052 recording all of this.

Left alone:

  • T-1055 (CSV export gives an empty file) is a different problem. The person who reported it says search works fine for them.
  • T-1061 is the engineering ticket tracking the search index rebuild, not a user report, so I didn't merge it. It's still linked to T-1052. That means T-1052 can't be closed until T-1061 is closed.

No escalation was needed. The task was to grade and assign the ticket, and its deadline stayed the same.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.