ScaffoldBench

RunOpus 5.5repeat 1

Gated-execute on Triage the weekend's queue on Monday morning

claude-opus-5-5__gated-execute__support-monday-triage__r1

Score

1.000

passed
design ran as designed
Cost
$2.70
Latency
8m 50s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
373
Tool calls
279
Subagents
46
Tokens in / out
1.5M / 41k
1,170,306 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
  • Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.

Phases

Execute: 0.0s to 8m 50s, finished, 84 tool calls, $0.472
Review 1: close_ticket: 32.4s to 38.1s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.053
Review 2: close_ticket: 38.1s to 45.3s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.020
Review 3: merge_tickets: 47.7s to 1m 1s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.054
Review 4: merge_tickets: 1m 1s to 1m 24s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.078
Review 5: merge_tickets: 1m 30s to 1m 39s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.043
Review 6: set_severity: 1m 42s to 1m 48s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.032
Review 7: set_severity: 1m 48s to 1m 56s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.033
Review 8: set_severity: 1m 56s to 2m 13s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.035
Review 9: set_severity: 2m 13s to 2m 20s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.032
Review 10: set_severity: 2m 20s to 2m 29s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.033
Review 11: set_severity: 2m 29s to 2m 36s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.036
Review 12: set_severity: 2m 36s to 2m 43s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.031
Review 13: set_severity: 2m 43s to 2m 49s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.032
Review 14: set_severity: 2m 49s to 2m 58s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.041
Review 15: set_severity: 2m 58s to 3m 5s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.034
Review 16: extend_sla: 3m 8s to 3m 16s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.039
Review 17: extend_sla: 3m 16s to 3m 25s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.041
Review 18: extend_sla: 3m 25s to 3m 33s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.045
Review 19: extend_sla: 3m 33s to 3m 43s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.047
Review 20: extend_sla: 3m 43s to 3m 51s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.043
Review 21: extend_sla: 3m 51s to 4m 1s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.048
Review 22: extend_sla: 4m 1s to 4m 9s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.044
Review 23: extend_sla: 4m 9s to 4m 17s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.045
Review 24: assign_ticket: 4m 19s to 4m 27s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.047
Review 25: assign_ticket: 4m 27s to 4m 53s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.063
Review 26: assign_ticket: 4m 53s to 5m 3s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.047
Review 27: assign_ticket: 5m 3s to 5m 13s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.051
Review 28: assign_ticket: 5m 13s to 5m 20s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.049
Review 29: assign_ticket: 5m 20s to 5m 31s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.062
Review 30: assign_ticket: 5m 31s to 5m 41s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.059
Review 31: assign_ticket: 5m 41s to 5m 53s, finished, 9 tool calls, $0.073
Review 32: assign_ticket: 5m 53s to 6m 2s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.056
Review 33: assign_ticket: 6m 2s to 6m 11s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.052
Review 34: post_comment: 6m 14s to 6m 24s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.047
Review 35: post_comment: 6m 24s to 6m 33s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.047
Review 36: post_comment: 6m 33s to 6m 43s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.060
Review 37: post_comment: 6m 43s to 6m 52s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.058
Review 38: post_comment: 6m 52s to 7m 0s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.052
Review 39: post_comment: 7m 0s to 7m 16s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.059
Review 40: post_comment: 7m 16s to 7m 22s, finished, 2 tool calls, $0.045
Review 41: set_severity: 7m 30s to 7m 38s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.054
Review 42: set_severity: 7m 38s to 7m 52s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.069
Review 43: extend_sla: 7m 52s to 7m 60s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.056
Review 44: extend_sla: 7m 60s to 8m 11s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.060
Review 45: assign_ticket: 8m 11s to 8m 30s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.072
Review 46: assign_ticket: 8m 30s to 8m 37s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.055

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Execute8m 50s$0.4728584claude-opus-5-5
Review 1: close_ticket5.7s$0.05331claude-opus-5-5
Review 2: close_ticket7.2s$0.02031claude-opus-5-5
Review 3: merge_tickets13.2s$0.054108claude-opus-5-5
Review 4: merge_tickets23.0s$0.078108claude-opus-5-5
Review 5: merge_tickets9.7s$0.04364claude-opus-5-5
Review 6: set_severity6.4s$0.03264claude-opus-5-5
Review 7: set_severity8.1s$0.03364claude-opus-5-5
Review 8: set_severity16.9s$0.03564claude-opus-5-5
Review 9: set_severity7.1s$0.03253claude-opus-5-5
Review 10: set_severity8.4s$0.03353claude-opus-5-5
Review 11: set_severity7.1s$0.03664claude-opus-5-5
Review 12: set_severity7.3s$0.03142claude-opus-5-5
Review 13: set_severity6.0s$0.03253claude-opus-5-5
Review 14: set_severity8.4s$0.04164claude-opus-5-5
Review 15: set_severity7.9s$0.03453claude-opus-5-5
Review 16: extend_sla8.4s$0.03975claude-opus-5-5
Review 17: extend_sla8.3s$0.04175claude-opus-5-5
Review 18: extend_sla8.0s$0.04575claude-opus-5-5
Review 19: extend_sla9.9s$0.04775claude-opus-5-5
Review 20: extend_sla8.1s$0.04364claude-opus-5-5
Review 21: extend_sla10.4s$0.04875claude-opus-5-5
Review 22: extend_sla7.8s$0.04464claude-opus-5-5
Review 23: extend_sla7.9s$0.04564claude-opus-5-5
Review 24: assign_ticket7.8s$0.04764claude-opus-5-5
Review 25: assign_ticket25.8s$0.06397claude-opus-5-5
Review 26: assign_ticket10.5s$0.04764claude-opus-5-5
Review 27: assign_ticket9.5s$0.05164claude-opus-5-5
Review 28: assign_ticket7.7s$0.04964claude-opus-5-5
Review 29: assign_ticket10.9s$0.06286claude-opus-5-5
Review 30: assign_ticket9.6s$0.05986claude-opus-5-5
Review 31: assign_ticket12.4s$0.073119claude-opus-5-5
Review 32: assign_ticket9.1s$0.05675claude-opus-5-5
Review 33: assign_ticket8.7s$0.05264claude-opus-5-5
Review 34: post_comment10.0s$0.04753claude-opus-5-5
Review 35: post_comment8.2s$0.04753claude-opus-5-5
Review 36: post_comment10.5s$0.06075claude-opus-5-5
Review 37: post_comment8.8s$0.05875claude-opus-5-5
Review 38: post_comment8.3s$0.05253claude-opus-5-5
Review 39: post_comment15.4s$0.05964claude-opus-5-5
Review 40: post_comment6.0s$0.04542claude-opus-5-5
Review 41: set_severity8.0s$0.05453claude-opus-5-5
Review 42: set_severity14.5s$0.06975claude-opus-5-5
Review 43: extend_sla7.5s$0.05664claude-opus-5-5
Review 44: extend_sla11.3s$0.06064claude-opus-5-5
Review 45: assign_ticket18.9s$0.07286claude-opus-5-5
Review 46: assign_ticket6.9s$0.05553claude-opus-5-5

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks support-monday-triage --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passT-2001 graded sev3
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev3

  • passT-2001 due 2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z

  • passT-2001 assigned to E-303
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-303

  • passT-2002 graded sev4
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev4

  • passT-2002 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z

  • passT-2002 assigned to E-203
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-203

  • passT-2003 graded sev2
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev2

  • passT-2003 due 2026-03-23T10:30:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T10:30:00Z

  • passT-2003 assigned to E-101
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-101

  • passT-2004 graded sev2
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev2

  • passT-2004 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z

  • passT-2004 assigned to E-201
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-201

  • passT-2006 graded sev2
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev2

  • passT-2006 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z

  • passT-2006 assigned to E-201
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-201

  • passT-2007 graded sev2
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev2

  • passT-2007 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z

  • passT-2007 assigned to E-601
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-601

  • passT-2008 graded sev4
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev4

  • passT-2008 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z

  • passT-2008 assigned to E-302
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-302

  • passT-2009 graded sev4
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev4

  • passT-2009 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z

  • passT-2009 assigned to E-102
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-102

  • passT-2011 graded sev2
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev2

  • passT-2011 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z

  • passT-2011 assigned to E-201
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-201

  • passT-2013 graded sev2
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev2

  • passT-2013 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z

  • passT-2013 assigned to E-303
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-303

  • passT-2015 graded sev1
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev1

  • passT-2015 due 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T09:10:00Z

  • passT-2015 assigned to E-201
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-201

  • passT-2016 graded sev4
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev4

  • passT-2016 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z

  • passT-2016 assigned to E-302
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-302

  • passT-2012 merged into T-2003
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passT-1999 merged into T-2003
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passT-2005 merged into T-2004
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passT-2010 closed as not a service request
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passT-2014 closed as not a service request
    1.00weight 0.02

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
279
failed tool calls
0
distinct tools
17

Final answer

The new queue is empty. I triaged all 16 tickets: the 14 from the weekend and two that arrived at 08:10Z while I was working. It is Monday 23 March, 08:10Z.

Closed as not service requests

  • T-2010 was marketing spam, and T-2014 was an out-of-office auto-reply.

Merged duplicates

  • T-2005 into T-2004 (CRM search errors): the knowledge base says all reports of failing CRM search are the same incident. T-2004 is the earliest report. It is sev2 (crm, department), due 12:10Z, assigned to E-201.
  • T-2012 and T-1999 into T-2003 (Payments builds failing since Saturday night): the reviewer blocked my first attempt and was right. An older open ticket, T-1999 (a CI alert about the same failure), already had a committed deadline of 10:30Z. I merged all three under T-2003, the earliest report, and kept the earliest committed deadline (10:30Z). T-1999 wasn't in the new queue, but the duplicates rule required it. T-2003 is sev2 (build-pipeline, department), assigned to E-101.

Severity, deadline and owner for the rest

TicketSeverityDueAssigned to
T-2015 Payslips missing for Finance (payroll, department)sev109:10Z todayE-201
T-2011 Warehouse overtime not imported (payroll, team)sev212:10Z todayE-201
T-2006 Wrong tax code on payslip (payroll, single-user)sev212:10Z todayE-201
T-2007 Password typed into a fake VPN login pagesev212:10Z todayE-601 (security on-call)
T-2013 Lisbon office cannot reach the VPN (department)sev212:10Z todayE-303
T-2001 Berlin VPN keeps dropping (team)sev317:00Z todayE-303
T-2002 Saved CRM filter disappearedsev4Thu 26 Mar, 17:00ZE-203
T-2008 VPN client update failssev4Thu 26 Mar, 17:00ZE-302
T-2009 Build logs page is slowsev4Thu 26 Mar, 17:00ZE-102
T-2016 VPN token app asks to register againsev4Thu 26 Mar, 17:00ZE-302

Why some of these differ from the default

  • T-2006 is sev2, not sev3: a knowledge-base amendment covering the payroll close (20–31 March) raises single-user payroll tickets to sev2.
  • T-2007 is a security incident: it came in as a VPN ticket, but entering a password on a fake page means suspected phishing and an exposed password. That makes it sev2, owned by the security on-call rotation.
  • Leave cover: E-301 is on leave today, so the network backup rotation covers T-2013 and T-2001 (E-303). E-202 is on leave on Thursday, so the business-apps backup rotation covers T-2002 (E-203).
  • sev3/sev4 deadlines: these count business hours only, starting when the desk opens at 09:00. They skip Wednesday 25 March, a company holiday.

I didn't page anyone or open any incidents, because nothing has company-wide impact. Two tickets are due soon: T-2015 (sev1) at 09:10Z and T-2003 at 10:30Z. I left comments on the tickets explaining the merges, the security routing, the amendment and the leave cover.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.