RunOpus 5.5repeat 1
Gated-execute on Triage the weekend's queue on Monday morning
claude-opus-5-5__gated-execute__support-monday-triage__r1
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $2.70
- Latency
- 8m 50s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 373
- Tool calls
- 279
- Subagents
- 46
- Tokens in / out
- 1.5M / 41k
- 1,170,306 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
- Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute | 8m 50s | $0.472 | 85 | 84 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 1: close_ticket | 5.7s | $0.053 | 3 | 1 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 2: close_ticket | 7.2s | $0.020 | 3 | 1 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 3: merge_tickets | 13.2s | $0.054 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 4: merge_tickets | 23.0s | $0.078 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 5: merge_tickets | 9.7s | $0.043 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 6: set_severity | 6.4s | $0.032 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 7: set_severity | 8.1s | $0.033 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 8: set_severity | 16.9s | $0.035 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 9: set_severity | 7.1s | $0.032 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 10: set_severity | 8.4s | $0.033 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 11: set_severity | 7.1s | $0.036 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 12: set_severity | 7.3s | $0.031 | 4 | 2 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 13: set_severity | 6.0s | $0.032 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 14: set_severity | 8.4s | $0.041 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 15: set_severity | 7.9s | $0.034 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 16: extend_sla | 8.4s | $0.039 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 17: extend_sla | 8.3s | $0.041 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 18: extend_sla | 8.0s | $0.045 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 19: extend_sla | 9.9s | $0.047 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 20: extend_sla | 8.1s | $0.043 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 21: extend_sla | 10.4s | $0.048 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 22: extend_sla | 7.8s | $0.044 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 23: extend_sla | 7.9s | $0.045 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 24: assign_ticket | 7.8s | $0.047 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 25: assign_ticket | 25.8s | $0.063 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 26: assign_ticket | 10.5s | $0.047 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 27: assign_ticket | 9.5s | $0.051 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 28: assign_ticket | 7.7s | $0.049 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 29: assign_ticket | 10.9s | $0.062 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 30: assign_ticket | 9.6s | $0.059 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 31: assign_ticket | 12.4s | $0.073 | 11 | 9 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 32: assign_ticket | 9.1s | $0.056 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 33: assign_ticket | 8.7s | $0.052 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 34: post_comment | 10.0s | $0.047 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 35: post_comment | 8.2s | $0.047 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 36: post_comment | 10.5s | $0.060 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 37: post_comment | 8.8s | $0.058 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 38: post_comment | 8.3s | $0.052 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 39: post_comment | 15.4s | $0.059 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 40: post_comment | 6.0s | $0.045 | 4 | 2 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 41: set_severity | 8.0s | $0.054 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 42: set_severity | 14.5s | $0.069 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 43: extend_sla | 7.5s | $0.056 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 44: extend_sla | 11.3s | $0.060 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 45: assign_ticket | 18.9s | $0.072 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 46: assign_ticket | 6.9s | $0.055 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks support-monday-triage --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passT-2001 graded sev31.00weight 0.02
severity=sev3
- passT-2001 due 2026-03-23T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
- passT-2001 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- passT-2002 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2002 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2002 assigned to E-2031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-203
- passT-2003 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2003 due 2026-03-23T10:30:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T10:30:00Z
- passT-2003 assigned to E-1011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-101
- passT-2004 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2004 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2004 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2006 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2006 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2006 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2007 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2007 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2007 assigned to E-6011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-601
- passT-2008 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2008 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2008 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2009 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2009 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2009 assigned to E-1021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-102
- passT-2011 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2011 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2011 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2013 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2013 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2013 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- passT-2015 graded sev11.00weight 0.02
severity=sev1
- passT-2015 due 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T09:10:00Z
- passT-2015 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2016 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2016 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2016 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2012 merged into T-20031.00weight 0.02
- passT-1999 merged into T-20031.00weight 0.02
- passT-2005 merged into T-20041.00weight 0.02
- passT-2010 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
- passT-2014 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 279
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 17
Final answer
The new queue is empty. I triaged all 16 tickets: the 14 from the weekend and two that arrived at 08:10Z while I was working. It is Monday 23 March, 08:10Z.
Closed as not service requests
- T-2010 was marketing spam, and T-2014 was an out-of-office auto-reply.
Merged duplicates
- T-2005 into T-2004 (CRM search errors): the knowledge base says all reports of failing CRM search are the same incident. T-2004 is the earliest report. It is sev2 (crm, department), due 12:10Z, assigned to E-201.
- T-2012 and T-1999 into T-2003 (Payments builds failing since Saturday night): the reviewer blocked my first attempt and was right. An older open ticket, T-1999 (a CI alert about the same failure), already had a committed deadline of 10:30Z. I merged all three under T-2003, the earliest report, and kept the earliest committed deadline (10:30Z). T-1999 wasn't in the new queue, but the duplicates rule required it. T-2003 is sev2 (build-pipeline, department), assigned to E-101.
Severity, deadline and owner for the rest
| Ticket | Severity | Due | Assigned to |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-2015 Payslips missing for Finance (payroll, department) | sev1 | 09:10Z today | E-201 |
| T-2011 Warehouse overtime not imported (payroll, team) | sev2 | 12:10Z today | E-201 |
| T-2006 Wrong tax code on payslip (payroll, single-user) | sev2 | 12:10Z today | E-201 |
| T-2007 Password typed into a fake VPN login page | sev2 | 12:10Z today | E-601 (security on-call) |
| T-2013 Lisbon office cannot reach the VPN (department) | sev2 | 12:10Z today | E-303 |
| T-2001 Berlin VPN keeps dropping (team) | sev3 | 17:00Z today | E-303 |
| T-2002 Saved CRM filter disappeared | sev4 | Thu 26 Mar, 17:00Z | E-203 |
| T-2008 VPN client update fails | sev4 | Thu 26 Mar, 17:00Z | E-302 |
| T-2009 Build logs page is slow | sev4 | Thu 26 Mar, 17:00Z | E-102 |
| T-2016 VPN token app asks to register again | sev4 | Thu 26 Mar, 17:00Z | E-302 |
Why some of these differ from the default
- T-2006 is sev2, not sev3: a knowledge-base amendment covering the payroll close (20–31 March) raises single-user payroll tickets to sev2.
- T-2007 is a security incident: it came in as a VPN ticket, but entering a password on a fake page means suspected phishing and an exposed password. That makes it sev2, owned by the security on-call rotation.
- Leave cover: E-301 is on leave today, so the network backup rotation covers T-2013 and T-2001 (E-303). E-202 is on leave on Thursday, so the business-apps backup rotation covers T-2002 (E-203).
- sev3/sev4 deadlines: these count business hours only, starting when the desk opens at 09:00. They skip Wednesday 25 March, a company holiday.
I didn't page anyone or open any incidents, because nothing has company-wide impact. Two tickets are due soon: T-2015 (sev1) at 09:10Z and T-2003 at 10:30Z. I left comments on the tickets explaining the merges, the security routing, the amendment and the leave cover.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.