RunOpus 5.5repeat 2
Gated-execute on Triage the weekend's queue on Monday morning
claude-opus-5-5__gated-execute__support-monday-triage__r2
Score
0.854
wrong answer
design ran as designed- Cost
- $2.19
- Latency
- 7m 44s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 314
- Tool calls
- 238
- Subagents
- 37
- Tokens in / out
- 1.2M / 35k
- 938,021 read from cache
Did the design run?
every check held
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- Every state change was reviewed: heldgated-execute.reviewedEvery call that changed the world had been allowed by a review before it ran, counted from the world’s own journal.
- Every decision was read: heldgated-execute.decisionsEvery review that ran to its end gave its decision through the schema; an unreadable one is a denial.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldgated-execute.toolsThe executor was shown the task’s full toolset and each reviewer the read-only tools.
Phases
Execute: 0.0s to 7m 44s, finished, 72 tool calls, $0.410
Review 1: close_ticket: 32.5s to 39.2s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.053
Review 2: close_ticket: 39.3s to 45.2s, finished, 1 tool call, $0.019
Review 3: merge_tickets: 45.3s to 57.2s, finished, 8 tool calls, $0.051
Review 4: merge_tickets: 57.3s to 1m 31s, finished, 10 tool calls, $0.109
Review 5: merge_tickets: 1m 38s to 1m 49s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.046
Review 6: set_severity: 1m 52s to 2m 1s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.040
Review 7: set_severity: 2m 1s to 2m 10s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.031
Review 8: set_severity: 2m 10s to 2m 20s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.036
Review 9: set_severity: 2m 20s to 2m 30s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.033
Review 10: set_severity: 2m 30s to 2m 41s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.045
Review 11: set_severity: 2m 41s to 2m 49s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.036
Review 12: set_severity: 2m 50s to 3m 2s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.036
Review 13: set_severity: 3m 2s to 3m 9s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.035
Review 14: set_severity: 3m 9s to 3m 16s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.035
Review 15: set_severity: 3m 16s to 3m 24s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.038
Review 16: extend_sla: 3m 27s to 3m 36s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.040
Review 17: extend_sla: 3m 36s to 3m 46s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.043
Review 18: extend_sla: 3m 46s to 3m 56s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.038
Review 19: extend_sla: 3m 56s to 4m 6s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.041
Review 20: extend_sla: 4m 6s to 4m 18s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.048
Review 21: extend_sla: 4m 18s to 4m 37s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.052
Review 22: extend_sla: 4m 37s to 4m 49s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.054
Review 23: extend_sla: 4m 49s to 5m 1s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.062
Review 24: assign_ticket: 5m 5s to 5m 13s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.051
Review 25: assign_ticket: 5m 13s to 5m 25s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.062
Review 26: assign_ticket: 5m 25s to 5m 35s, finished, 5 tool calls, $0.053
Review 27: assign_ticket: 5m 35s to 5m 44s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.049
Review 28: assign_ticket: 5m 44s to 5m 56s, finished, 7 tool calls, $0.062
Review 29: assign_ticket: 5m 56s to 6m 8s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.060
Review 30: assign_ticket: 6m 9s to 6m 19s, finished, 6 tool calls, $0.061
Review 31: assign_ticket: 6m 19s to 6m 29s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.051
Review 32: assign_ticket: 6m 29s to 6m 38s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.051
Review 33: assign_ticket: 6m 38s to 6m 52s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.050
Review 34: post_comment: 6m 55s to 7m 3s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.045
Review 35: post_comment: 7m 3s to 7m 16s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.055
Review 36: post_comment: 7m 16s to 7m 23s, finished, 3 tool calls, $0.052
Review 37: post_comment: 7m 23s to 7m 32s, finished, 4 tool calls, $0.054
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute | 7m 44s | $0.410 | 73 | 72 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 1: close_ticket | 6.8s | $0.053 | 3 | 1 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 2: close_ticket | 6.0s | $0.019 | 3 | 1 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 3: merge_tickets | 12.0s | $0.051 | 10 | 8 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 4: merge_tickets | 33.6s | $0.109 | 12 | 10 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 5: merge_tickets | 11.2s | $0.046 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 6: set_severity | 9.2s | $0.040 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 7: set_severity | 8.7s | $0.031 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 8: set_severity | 9.6s | $0.036 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 9: set_severity | 10.6s | $0.033 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 10: set_severity | 11.0s | $0.045 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 11: set_severity | 8.1s | $0.036 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 12: set_severity | 12.2s | $0.036 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 13: set_severity | 7.1s | $0.035 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 14: set_severity | 7.0s | $0.035 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 15: set_severity | 8.0s | $0.038 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 16: extend_sla | 9.1s | $0.040 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 17: extend_sla | 10.2s | $0.043 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 18: extend_sla | 10.0s | $0.038 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 19: extend_sla | 9.8s | $0.041 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 20: extend_sla | 12.0s | $0.048 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 21: extend_sla | 19.0s | $0.052 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 22: extend_sla | 12.4s | $0.054 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 23: extend_sla | 12.0s | $0.062 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 24: assign_ticket | 8.2s | $0.051 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 25: assign_ticket | 12.2s | $0.062 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 26: assign_ticket | 9.5s | $0.053 | 7 | 5 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 27: assign_ticket | 9.1s | $0.049 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 28: assign_ticket | 11.7s | $0.062 | 9 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 29: assign_ticket | 12.8s | $0.060 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 30: assign_ticket | 10.7s | $0.061 | 8 | 6 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 31: assign_ticket | 9.4s | $0.051 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 32: assign_ticket | 9.1s | $0.051 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 33: assign_ticket | 13.8s | $0.050 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 34: post_comment | 7.8s | $0.045 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 35: post_comment | 13.0s | $0.055 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 36: post_comment | 7.3s | $0.052 | 5 | 3 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Review 37: post_comment | 8.8s | $0.054 | 6 | 4 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies gated-execute --tasks support-monday-triage --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passT-2001 graded sev31.00weight 0.02
severity=sev3
- passT-2001 due 2026-03-23T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
- passT-2001 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- passT-2002 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2002 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2002 assigned to E-2031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-203
- passT-2003 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2003 due 2026-03-23T10:30:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T10:30:00Z
- passT-2003 assigned to E-1011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-101
- passT-2004 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2004 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2004 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2006 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2006 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2006 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2007 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2007 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2007 assigned to E-6011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-601
- passT-2008 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2008 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2008 assigned to E-3021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-302
- passT-2009 graded sev41.00weight 0.02
severity=sev4
- passT-2009 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
- passT-2009 assigned to E-1021.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-102
- passT-2011 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2011 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2011 assigned to E-2011.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-201
- passT-2013 graded sev21.00weight 0.02
severity=sev2
- passT-2013 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z1.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
- passT-2013 assigned to E-3031.00weight 0.02
assignee=E-303
- failT-2015 graded sev10.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
- failT-2015 due 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
- failT-2015 assigned to E-2010.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
- failT-2016 graded sev40.00weight 0.02
severity=unset
- failT-2016 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z0.00weight 0.02
sla_due_at=not set
- failT-2016 assigned to E-3020.00weight 0.02
assignee=unassigned
- passT-2012 merged into T-20031.00weight 0.02
- passT-1999 merged into T-20031.00weight 0.02
- passT-2005 merged into T-20041.00weight 0.02
- passT-2010 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
- passT-2014 closed as not a service request1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 238
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 17
Final answer
I've triaged all 14 tickets in the new queue (desk time Mon 2026-03-23 08:10 UTC). Two were closed as junk, three were merged into others as duplicates, and the remaining nine were graded, given deadlines and assigned. None had company-wide impact, so no major incident was opened.
Closed as not service requests
- T-2014: an automatic out-of-office reply.
- T-2010: marketing spam from SyncFlow.
Merged duplicates
- T-2012 and T-1999 into T-2003 (payments builds failing). The reviewer stopped my first merge because I had missed T-1999. That was an already-open CI alert about the same failure, with a deadline of 10:30Z committed to its requester. T-2003 survives because it was created first, and it keeps that 10:30Z deadline because the earliest committed deadline in a merged set wins. It is sev2 (build pipeline, department-wide) and assigned to E-101.
- T-2005 into T-2004 (CRM search errors). The knowledge base says all failing-search reports are one incident. T-2004 is sev2 (department-wide), due 12:10Z, assigned to E-201.
The other tickets
| Ticket | Severity | Due (UTC) | Assignee |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-2013 Lisbon office can't reach the VPN | sev2 | Mon 12:10 | E-303 (cover) |
| T-2001 Berlin VPN keeps dropping | sev3 | Mon 17:00 | E-303 (cover) |
| T-2008 VPN client update fails | sev4 | Thu 26 17:00 | E-302 |
| T-2011 Warehouse overtime not imported | sev2 | Mon 12:10 | E-201 |
| T-2006 Wrong tax code on payslip | sev2 | Mon 12:10 | E-201 |
| T-2002 Saved CRM filter disappeared | sev4 | Thu 26 17:00 | E-203 (cover) |
| T-2009 Build logs page is slow | sev4 | Thu 26 17:00 | E-102 |
| T-2007 Phishing / password entered on a fake page | sev2 | Mon 12:10 | E-601 (security) |
Choices that differ from the plain matrix lookup
- Business-hours deadlines: sev3 and sev4 clocks only run during desk hours. They start at 09:00 today, and the sev4 deadlines skip Wednesday's company holiday (25 March).
- T-2006: a temporary rule in the knowledge base for the March payroll close (20–31 March) makes single-user payroll tickets sev2 instead of sev3.
- T-2007: this is a phishing report, so it is a sev2 security incident owned by the security on-call team. The service field still says VPN because there is no security option.
- Leave cover: E-301 is on leave today, so E-303 from the network backup team takes the two VPN tickets. E-202 is on leave Thursday, so E-203 from the business-apps backup team takes T-2002.
I left comments on T-2003, T-2004, T-2006 and T-2007 explaining these decisions. Nothing was paged and no access requests were touched.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.