RunOpus 5.5repeat 1
Orchestrator-workers on Settle change requests under dated bulletins
claude-opus-5-5__orchestrator-workers__airline-waiver-desk__r1
Score
0.818
- Cost
- $0.505
- Latency
- 1m 60s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 90
- Tool calls
- 86
- Subagents
- 1
- Tokens in / out
- 218k / 13k
- 189,490 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
- The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
- The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decompose | 11.0s | $0.026 | 2 | 0 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Worker 1: all | 1m 32s | $0.427 | 87 | 86 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Synthesize | 17.2s | $0.053 | 1 | 0 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks airline-waiver-desk --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR5201: DL542 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5201 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- passQ-301 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5202: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5202 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3500; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3500
- passQ-302 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5203: AA664 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5203 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 15000, fare_difference 2500; ledger got change_fee 15000, fare_difference 2500
- passQ-303 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5204: UA90 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5204 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 3500; ledger got fare_difference 3500
- passQ-304 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5205: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5205 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 1000; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 1000
- passQ-305 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5207: AA218 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5207 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- passQ-307 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5208: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5208 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got change_fee 7500
- passQ-308 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5209: AA1406 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5209 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- passQ-309 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR5210: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin1.00weight 0.03
- passR5210 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed1.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3000; ledger got change_fee 7500, fare_difference 3000
- passQ-310 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- failR5211: AA216 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5211 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 0, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-311 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
- failR5212: AA662 replaces the requested segment, the rest unchanged, same cabin0.00weight 0.03
- failR5212 charged exactly the change fee and fare difference owed0.00weight 0.05
owed change_fee 7500, fare_difference 0; ledger got nothing
- failQ-312 resolved with a note to the customer0.00weight 0.01
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 86
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 12
Final answer
All nine flight-change requests from yesterday were completed and settled. Q-306 was left open because it asks for a cancellation, not a flight change. One thing needs your decision: three customers asked for a free change and were charged without agreeing to it. Everything below comes from the worker's report; I couldn't check the records myself.
Which date the bulletins were judged on: The system date was 2026-07-28, but today is 2026-10-05. The worker used 28 July, which makes "yesterday" 27 July, to decide which bulletins applied.
- In effect: the Chicago weather waiver (PB-2026-14) and its 27 July amendment (PB-2026-14A), and the bulletins on same-day changes (PB-2026-12), overlapping bulletins (PB-2026-17) and the $150 basic economy change fee (PB-2026-16).
- Expired: the Boston hurricane waiver (PB-2026-09) ended on 15 July.
The rules say a bulletin applies if it's in effect "on the day you act." If that day is really 5 October, different bulletins may apply and some charges or waivers below could be wrong. Please confirm which date is correct.
Changes made: Every new flight was scheduled, had seats in the cabin the customer booked, and kept that cabin.
| Request | Change | Charged | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q-301 R5201 | AA210 3 Aug → DL542 6 Aug | $0 | Covered by the Chicago waiver |
| Q-302 R5202 | AA660 5 Aug → AA664 7 Aug | $75 change fee + $35 fare difference | Boston trip, which the Chicago waiver doesn't cover |
| Q-303 R5203 | AA662 5 Aug → AA664 7 Aug (basic economy) | $150 change fee + $25 fare difference | Hurricane waiver they cited had expired; silver status doesn't waive the fee |
| Q-304 R5204 | UA88 3 Aug → UA90 9 Aug (basic economy) | $35 fare difference | Waiver drops the change fee, but basic economy still pays any fare difference |
| Q-305 R5205 | AA214 4 Aug → AA216 8 Aug | $75 change fee + $10 fare difference | Ticketed 26 July, after the waiver's 24 July cutoff |
| Q-307 R5207 | AA212 5 Aug → AA218 8 Aug | $0 | The amendment covers platinum members travelling up to 5 Aug |
| Q-308 R5208 | AA660 → AA662, both 5 Aug | $75 | Flat same-day change fee, which was cheaper than normal rules |
| Q-309 R5209 | Second flight only: AA1402 → AA1406, 3 Aug | $0 | Waiver applies; the connection still works (lands 12:25, next flight 19:55) |
| Q-310 R5210 | AA210 3 Aug → AA216 8 Aug | $75 change fee + $30 fare difference | He already used the waiver's one allowed move on 26 July |
Each charge is a separate ledger entry (L1–L10). Every completed request was closed with a note telling the customer what changed, what they were charged and why.
Open items:
- Charges the customers didn't agree to: Q-302, Q-303 and Q-310 asked for a free change but were rebooked and charged without confirming they would pay. If any of them object, their change has to be reversed and the charge refunded. This hasn't been done.
- Bulletin date: the 28 July versus 5 October question above is unresolved.
- Q-306 is still open for the cancellations team.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.