ScaffoldBench

RunOpus 5.5repeat 1

Orchestrator-workers on Triage the weekend's queue on Monday morning

claude-opus-5-5__orchestrator-workers__support-monday-triage__r1

Score

0.951

wrong answer
design ran as designed
Cost
$0.573
Latency
2m 17s
setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
Turns
85
Tool calls
81
Subagents
1
Tokens in / out
355k / 14k
322,506 read from cache

Did the design run?

every check held
  • Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
  • No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
  • Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
  • No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
  • Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
  • No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
  • Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
  • Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
  • No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
  • The task was decomposed: heldorchestrator-workers.decompositionThe orchestrator’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one subtask.
  • The fan-out happened: heldorchestrator-workers.fan-outEvery subtask got a worker, every worker ran, and the recorded subagent count matches.
  • The synthesis wrote the answer: heldorchestrator-workers.synthesisThe final answer came from the synthesis call, not from a worker’s report standing in for it.
  • Each call was shown the right tools: heldorchestrator-workers.toolsThe orchestrator and the synthesis were shown no tools and every worker the task’s full toolset.

Phases

Decompose: 0.0s to 11.3s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.037
Worker 1: all: 11.3s to 1m 53s, finished, 81 tool calls, $0.455
Synthesize: 1m 53s to 2m 17s, finished, 0 tool calls, $0.081

Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.

PhaseDurationCostTurnsToolsModel
Decompose11.3s$0.03720claude-opus-5-5
Worker 1: all1m 42s$0.4558281claude-opus-5-5
Synthesize24.0s$0.08110claude-opus-5-5

The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.

Runs you can replay

Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies orchestrator-workers --tasks support-monday-triage --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1

Score breakdown

  • passT-2001 graded sev3
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev3

  • passT-2001 due 2026-03-23T17:00:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T17:00:00Z

  • passT-2001 assigned to E-303
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-303

  • passT-2002 graded sev4
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev4

  • passT-2002 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z

  • passT-2002 assigned to E-203
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-203

  • passT-2003 graded sev2
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev2

  • failT-2003 due 2026-03-23T10:30:00Z
    0.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z

  • passT-2003 assigned to E-101
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-101

  • passT-2004 graded sev2
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev2

  • passT-2004 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z

  • passT-2004 assigned to E-201
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-201

  • passT-2006 graded sev2
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev2

  • passT-2006 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z

  • passT-2006 assigned to E-201
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-201

  • passT-2007 graded sev2
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev2

  • passT-2007 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z

  • passT-2007 assigned to E-601
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-601

  • passT-2008 graded sev4
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev4

  • passT-2008 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z

  • passT-2008 assigned to E-302
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-302

  • passT-2009 graded sev4
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev4

  • passT-2009 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z

  • passT-2009 assigned to E-102
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-102

  • passT-2011 graded sev2
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev2

  • passT-2011 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z

  • passT-2011 assigned to E-201
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-201

  • passT-2013 graded sev2
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev2

  • passT-2013 due 2026-03-23T12:10:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T12:10:00Z

  • passT-2013 assigned to E-303
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-303

  • passT-2015 graded sev1
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev1

  • passT-2015 due 2026-03-23T09:10:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-23T09:10:00Z

  • passT-2015 assigned to E-201
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-201

  • passT-2016 graded sev4
    1.00weight 0.02

    severity=sev4

  • passT-2016 due 2026-03-26T17:00:00Z
    1.00weight 0.02

    sla_due_at=2026-03-26T17:00:00Z

  • passT-2016 assigned to E-302
    1.00weight 0.02

    assignee=E-302

  • passT-2012 merged into T-2003
    1.00weight 0.02
  • failT-1999 merged into T-2003
    0.00weight 0.02
  • passT-2005 merged into T-2004
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passT-2010 closed as not a service request
    1.00weight 0.02
  • passT-2014 closed as not a service request
    1.00weight 0.02

Penalties

No penalties were applied.

Scorer metadata

tool calls
81
failed tool calls
0
distinct tools
15

Final answer

Weekend queue triage: done, with three things for you to check

All 14 weekend tickets have been triaged and the new queue is empty. This is based only on the worker's report; I had no way to inspect the tickets myself. Desk time was Monday 2026-03-23 08:10Z, before the desk opens at 09:00.

Results

Closed as not service requests

  • T-2014: automatic out-of-office reply.
  • T-2010: SyncFlow marketing email.

Merged as duplicates (in both cases the earliest report survived)

  • T-2005 into T-2004: the same CRM search failure, which KB-23 treats as one incident.
  • T-2012 into T-2003: see the first item under "Needs your attention".

Severity, deadline and owner

Sev1 and sev2 deadlines run on the clock from 08:10. Sev3 and sev4 deadlines count business hours from 09:00, skipping the company holiday on 25 Mar.

TicketSevDue (UTC)Assignee
T-2011 Overtime not imported (payroll)sev203-23 12:10E-201
T-2006 Wrong tax code (payroll)sev2 (KB-55 amendment; the matrix says sev3)03-23 12:10E-201
T-2004 CRM search errorssev203-23 12:10E-201
T-2003 Payments builds failingsev203-23 12:10E-101
T-2013 Lisbon cannot reach VPNsev203-23 12:10E-303 (covering)
T-2007 Password typed into fake VPN pagesev2 security incident03-23 12:10E-601 (security-oncall)
T-2001 Berlin VPN dropssev303-23 17:00E-303 (covering)
T-2002 Saved filter gone (CRM)sev403-26 17:00E-203 (covering)
T-2008 VPN client update failssev403-26 17:00E-302
T-2009 Build logs slowsev403-26 17:00E-102

Where the rules changed the routing

  • Leave cover: E-301 is on leave today, so network-secondary's E-303 has T-2001 and T-2013. E-202 is on leave on 26 Mar, so business-apps-secondary's E-203 has T-2002.
  • Security: T-2007 arrived on the VPN queue, but the user typed their password into a phishing page. That makes it a sev2 security incident owned by security-oncall. A comment on the ticket points to KB-52 (reset credentials, check the account for misuse).
  • No major incident: no ticket reported company-wide impact, so none was declared.

Needs your attention

  1. Two tickets outside the weekend set were changed. T-2015 (payslips missing, Finance, sev1, due 09:10Z, assigned to E-201) and T-2016 (VPN token re-register, sev4, due 03-26 17:00, assigned to E-302) arrived on Monday while the work was under way. They are not weekend tickets, and the handbook says to change only the tickets the request is about.

    • Please review them and decide whether to keep that triage.
    • T-2015 is urgent: it is sev1, due at 09:10Z, and nobody has been paged. Whether to page is your call, since a page cannot be taken back.
  2. The T-2012 → T-2003 merge was a judgement call. The worker said the handbook left "same problem" to its judgement. Both tickets report all payments builds failing from Saturday night, so the merge is plausible. However, the handbook only allows merging reports of the same underlying problem, and nothing confirms the cause. Please check it.
  3. References may not have moved. The handbook says every reference to a merged ticket moves to the survivor. The report doesn't say whether references to T-2005 and T-2012 were moved to T-2004 and T-2003, so treat that as unconfirmed.
  4. E-201's load is heavy. E-201 holds three sev2 tickets due at 12:10Z, plus T-2015 if that assignment stands. Any rebalancing has to stay within the owning rotation.

Provenance of the numbers on this page

run set
scaffold-or-scale-v1
models
Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
effort
high
repeats
2
fixtures
replay
runs
900 / 900
strategy cost
$354.44
judge cost
$9.19
wall clock
9h 48m
git
fce5807b2d

Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.