RunOpus 5.5repeat 1
Plan-execute-verify on Audit a week of baggage fees
claude-opus-5-5__plan-execute-verify__airline-baggage-audit__r1
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.834
- Latency
- 2m 54s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 179
- Tool calls
- 174
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 551k / 19k
- 502,049 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute-verify.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Every verdict was read: heldplan-execute-verify.verdictsEvery review round ended with a verdict read from the schema reply, not a default.
- The loop did what its verdicts said: heldplan-execute-verify.loopEvery verdict that called for a revision got one, and nothing was revised without such a verdict.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute-verify.toolsThe planner was shown no tools, the verifier the read-only ones, and the executor and reviser the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 18.5s | $0.037 | 2 | 0 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Execute | 1m 41s | $0.499 | 108 | 107 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Verify | 53.7s | $0.298 | 69 | 67 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute-verify --tasks airline-baggage-audit --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passL2 (R8124): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL2: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL3 (R8125): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 12000 of an expected 12000
- passL3: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL4 (R8112): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL4: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL5 (R8116): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 5500 of an expected 5500
- passL5: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL6 (R8117): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL6: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL7 (R8118): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 4500 of an expected 4500
- passL7: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL8 (R8120): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL8: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL9 (R8126): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL9: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL10 (R8113): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 7500 of an expected 7500
- passL10: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL11 (R8115): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL11: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL12 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL12: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL13 (R8123): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL13: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL15 (R8119): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 2500 of an expected 2500
- passL15: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL16 (R8110): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL16: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL17 (R8111): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL17: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL18 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL18: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
- passL19 (R8114): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 5000 of an expected 5000
- passL19: audit outcome recorded as overcharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL20 (R8121): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL20: audit outcome recorded as undercharged1.00weight 0.02
- passL21 (R8122): audited, and refunded exactly the overcharge, if any1.00weight 0.04
refunded 0 of an expected 0
- passL21: audit outcome recorded as correct1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 174
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 11
Final answer
I audited all 19 baggage fees posted from 2026-07-20 through 2026-07-26. Twelve were correct, five were overcharged, one was a duplicate and two were undercharged. All 19 are now annotated, and I refunded 37,000 cents in total across six refunds (L25–L30).
Rules used: The baggage rules give each cabin a free allowance (basic economy 0, economy 1, premium economy and business 2). Tier adds bags: silver +1, gold and platinum +2. Before 2026-07-23, the first bag over the allowance cost 4,500 cents and each further bag 7,500. Bulletin PB-2026-13 raised the first chargeable bag to 5,000 cents from 2026-07-23 and applies to everyone. The other bulletin (PB-2026-11) is about seat fees, so I ignored it. For each fee I used the passenger's tier and cabin on the date it was posted, from the tier and reservation histories, not today's values.
| Entry | Res. | Posted | Facts on that date | Should be | Charged | Verdict | Refund |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2 | R8124 | 07-20 | economy, no tier, 2 bags | 4,500 | 4,500 | correct | – |
| L3 | R8125 | 07-20 | economy, gold (dropped to none on 07-21), 3 bags | 0 | 12,000 | overcharged | 12,000 (L25) |
| L4 | R8112 | 07-21 | economy, no tier, 3 bags | 12,000 | 9,000 | undercharged | – |
| L5 | R8116 | 07-21 | economy, silver, 3 bags | 4,500 | 12,000 | overcharged by 7,500 | 5,500 (L26) |
| L6 | R8117 | 07-21 | basic economy, silver (gold from 07-22), 3 bags | 12,000 | 12,000 | correct | – |
| L7 | R8118 | 07-21 | economy, silver, 2 bags | 0 | 4,500 | overcharged | 4,500 (L27) |
| L8 | R8120 | 07-21 | economy (moved to premium economy 07-22), no tier, 3 bags | 12,000 | 12,000 | correct | – |
| L9 | R8126 | 07-21 | economy, no tier (silver from 07-22), 3 bags | 12,000 | 12,000 | correct | – |
| L10 | R8113 | 07-22 | basic economy, silver, 2 bags | 4,500 | 12,000 | overcharged | 7,500 (L28) |
| L11 | R8115 | 07-22 | economy, silver, 3 bags | 4,500 | 4,500 | correct | – |
| L12 | R8122 | 07-22 | economy, no tier, 2 bags | 4,500 | 4,500 | correct | – |
| L13 | R8123 | 07-22 | economy (moved to premium economy 07-23), silver, 3 bags | 4,500 | 4,500 | correct | – |
| L15 | R8119 | 07-24 | basic economy, gold, 3 bags, new price | 5,000 | 7,500 | overcharged | 2,500 (L29) |
| L16 | R8110 | 07-25 | economy, no tier, 2 bags, new price | 5,000 | 5,000 | correct | – |
| L17 | R8111 | 07-25 | economy, no tier, 3 bags, new price | 12,500 | 12,500 | correct | – |
| L18 | R8114 | 07-25 | economy, silver, 3 bags, new price | 5,000 | 5,000 | correct | – |
| L19 | R8114 | 07-25 | second charge for the same 3 bags as L18 | 0 | 5,000 | overcharged (duplicate) | 5,000 (L30) |
| L20 | R8121 | 07-25 | basic economy, no tier, 1 bag, new price | 5,000 | 4,500 | undercharged | – |
| L21 | R8122 | 07-25 | economy, no tier, 3rd bag added | 7,500 | 7,500 | correct | – |
Judgement calls:
- L5 (R8116): The overcharge was 7,500, but another agent had already refunded 2,000 against L5 as a courtesy (L24, 2026-07-27). I refunded the remaining 5,500, so the total returned equals the overcharge exactly.
- L21 (R8122): I didn't treat this as a duplicate. It charges for a new third bag, not the two bags L12 already paid for. That bag is the passenger's second chargeable bag, which costs 7,500, so the charge is correct.
- Payment method: The payment check returned "no payment instrument on file" for all six refunded reservations, not "inactive". A refund to the original payment had already gone through on R8116, so I used the original payment method. Each refund confirmed it posted there; none went out as travel credit. You may want to confirm that is right for these bookings.
Undercharges left unbilled, as the rules require: L4 (R8112) was short by 3,000 and L20 (R8121) by 500.
Notes:
- The annotation tool only records the verdict. The reason for each refund is in its refund note, and this table covers the rest.
- No bookings show more than 3 checked bags, and no other entries or bookings were changed.
- The system's dates don't match: the bulletin list reports today as 2026-07-28 and the refunds posted with that date, while the session date is 2026-10-05.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.