RunOpus 5.5repeat 1
Plan-execute-verify on Work a cancellation queue where cash cannot be recalled
claude-opus-5-5__plan-execute-verify__airline-cancellation-queue__r1
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.872
- Latency
- 2m 55s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 193
- Tool calls
- 185
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 469k / 18k
- 408,141 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute-verify.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Every verdict was read: heldplan-execute-verify.verdictsEvery review round ended with a verdict read from the schema reply, not a default.
- The loop did what its verdicts said: heldplan-execute-verify.loopEvery verdict that called for a revision got one, and nothing was revised without such a verdict.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute-verify.toolsThe planner was shown no tools, the verifier the read-only ones, and the executor and reviser the full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 14.6s | $0.030 | 2 | 0 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Execute | 1m 9s | $0.339 | 73 | 72 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Verify | 29.4s | $0.158 | 35 | 33 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Revise (round 1) | 26.3s | $0.121 | 23 | 22 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Verify revision 1 | 36.0s | $0.223 | 60 | 58 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute-verify --tasks airline-cancellation-queue --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR7101 cancelled1.00weight 0.03
- passR7101 closed out with exactly one entry of the right kind, method and amount1.00weight 0.06
expected refund/original_payment 27000; ledger got refund/original_payment 27000
- passQ-401 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR7102 cancelled1.00weight 0.03
- passR7102 closed out with exactly one entry of the right kind, method and amount1.00weight 0.06
expected refund/original_payment 21000; ledger got refund/original_payment 21000
- passQ-402 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR7103 cancelled1.00weight 0.03
- passR7103 closed out with exactly one entry of the right kind, method and amount1.00weight 0.06
expected refund/travel_credit 26000; ledger got refund/travel_credit 26000
- passQ-403 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR7104 cancelled1.00weight 0.03
- passR7104 closed out with exactly one entry of the right kind, method and amount1.00weight 0.06
expected refund/original_payment 20000; ledger got refund/original_payment 20000
- passQ-404 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR7105 cancelled1.00weight 0.03
- passR7105 closed out with exactly one entry of the right kind, method and amount1.00weight 0.06
expected non_refundable; ledger got non_refundable 0
- passQ-405 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR7106 cancelled1.00weight 0.03
- passR7106 closed out with exactly one entry of the right kind, method and amount1.00weight 0.06
expected refund/travel_credit 19800; ledger got refund/travel_credit 19800
- passQ-406 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR7108 cancelled1.00weight 0.03
- passR7108 closed out with exactly one entry of the right kind, method and amount1.00weight 0.06
expected refund/original_payment 12000; ledger got refund/original_payment 12000
- passQ-408 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR7110 cancelled1.00weight 0.03
- passR7110 closed out with exactly one entry of the right kind, method and amount1.00weight 0.06
expected refund/travel_credit 32000; ledger got refund/travel_credit 32000
- passQ-409 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR7111 cancelled1.00weight 0.03
- passR7111 closed out with exactly one entry of the right kind, method and amount1.00weight 0.06
expected refund/original_payment 30000; ledger got refund/original_payment 30000
- passQ-410 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
- passR7112 cancelled1.00weight 0.03
- passR7112 closed out with exactly one entry of the right kind, method and amount1.00weight 0.06
expected refund/original_payment 24000; ledger got refund/original_payment 24000
- passQ-412 resolved with a note to the customer1.00weight 0.01
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 185
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 16
Final answer
The verifier was right. My earlier summary said I'd worked all 8 open cancellation requests, but there were 10. I missed Q-410 and Q-412, and both are now done.
Before acting, I checked each booking's refund policy, the passenger's tier and tier history, the card status and the ledger. Neither booking had any earlier ledger entries, and there are no operational bulletins.
| Request | Booking | Outcome | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q-410 | R7111 (Wren Ashby, economy, $300, SFO to JFK on 18 Aug) | Cancelled; $300.00 back to the Amex ending 6402 | Economy is refundable to the card. She is a platinum member (her tier has never changed), so she pays no $50 cancellation fee. Her card is active. |
| Q-412 | R7112 (Zoe Clark, economy, $290, SFO to LAX on 24 Aug) | Cancelled; $240.00 back to the Visa ending 3358 | Economy is refundable to the card. She is a silver member, so the $50 fee applies ($290 − $50). Her card is active. |
Both requests are resolved with a note telling the customer what they're getting and why.
Corrected overall summary: I've worked all 10 open cancellation requests: Q-401 to Q-406, Q-408, Q-409, Q-410 and Q-412. Each booking is cancelled, settled with one refund or non-refundable record, and its request resolved. The other 8 outcomes are as in my earlier report and I didn't change them. Q-407 is a flight change request, not a cancellation, so I left it open for the team that owns it. As before, I applied the rules as of 2026-07-28, the system date the refund policy tool reports, rather than 2026-10-05.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.