RunOpus 5.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Re-protect a cancelled flight when seats are scarce
claude-opus-5-5__plan-execute__airline-irrops-reprotect__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.595
- Latency
- 2m 39s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 81
- Tool calls
- 78
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 339k / 16k
- 309,171 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 22.1s | $0.061 | 2 | 0 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Execute | 2m 17s | $0.534 | 79 | 78 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks airline-irrops-reprotect --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passR6101 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6101 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6101: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6102 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on DL512 in economy; expected DL512 in economy
- passR6102 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 15000, hotel 0; issued compensation 15000
- passR6102: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6103 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in business; expected UA88 in business
- passR6103 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6103: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6104 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6104 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6104: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6105 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in basic_economy; expected AA204 in basic_economy
- passR6105 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6105: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6106 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in basic_economy; expected UA88 in basic_economy
- passR6106 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6106: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6107 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA206 in economy; expected AA206 in economy
- passR6107 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 24000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 24000, hotel 18000
- passR6107: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6108 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210 in economy; expected AA210 in economy
- passR6108 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 0; issued compensation 30000
- passR6108: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6109 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on UA88 in premium_economy; expected UA88 in premium_economy
- passR6109 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6109: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6110 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6110 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6110: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6111 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in economy; expected AA204 in economy
- passR6111 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6111: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6112 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA204 in business; expected AA204 in business
- passR6112 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 0, hotel 0; issued nothing
- passR6112: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
- passR6113 re-protected on the prescribed itinerary and cabin1.00weight 0.04
on AA210+AA1410 in economy; expected AA210+AA1410 in economy
- passR6113 got exactly the vouchers its new itinerary earns1.00weight 0.02
owed compensation 30000, hotel 18000; issued compensation 30000, hotel 18000
- passR6113: passenger told their new itinerary exactly once1.00weight 0.02
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 78
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 11
Final answer
I've rebooked all 13 reservations from the cancelled AA918, issued the vouchers they were owed and sent each passenger one message. No bulletins were in effect, so the handbook rules applied unchanged. The original flight was due into Chicago O'Hare (ORD) at 13:40 on 3 Aug, and Dev's and Mo's AA1402 connection was due into Boston at 18:55. Every move went through with no change fee or fare difference, and AA918's passenger list is now empty.
I seated people in priority order: tier (platinum, gold, silver, none), then earliest booking date. Each got the soonest-arriving seat in their own cabin.
| Reservation | Passenger (tier, cabin paid) | New flights | Arrives | Vouchers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R6103 | Chloe Park (platinum, business) | UA88, 3 Aug, 06:15 | ORD 12:25, 3 Aug | none (early) |
| R6109 | Iris Vance (platinum, economy) | UA88, 3 Aug, moved up to premium economy | ORD 12:25, 3 Aug | none |
| R6110 + R6111 | Jun Takeda + Kofi Mensah (travelling together; ranked gold via Kofi), economy | AA204, 3 Aug, 09:05, kept together | ORD 15:15, 3 Aug | none (1h35 late) |
| R6102 | Ben Okafor (gold, economy) | DL512, 3 Aug, 12:30 | ORD 18:40, 3 Aug | $150 (5h late) |
| R6106 | Farid Haddad (gold, basic economy) | UA88, 3 Aug | ORD 12:25, 3 Aug | none |
| R6112 | Lea Sorensen (gold, premium economy) | AA204, 3 Aug, moved up to business | ORD 15:15, 3 Aug | none |
| R6104 | Dev Mehta (silver, economy, to Boston) | AA210, 3 Aug, 17:40, then AA1410, 4 Aug, 09:00 | BOS 12:25, 4 Aug | $300 + $180 hotel |
| R6113 | Mo Farah (silver, economy, to Boston) | AA210, 3 Aug, 17:40, then AA1410, 4 Aug, 09:00 | BOS 12:25, 4 Aug | $300 + $180 hotel |
| R6108 | Hugo Brandt (silver, economy) | AA210, 3 Aug, 17:40 | ORD 23:50, 3 Aug | $300 (10h10 late) |
| R6107 | Grace Liu (no tier, economy) | AA206, 4 Aug, 09:05 | ORD 15:15, 4 Aug | $240 (capped at her fare) + $180 hotel |
| R6101 | Ana Ruiz (no tier, economy) | AA206, 4 Aug, 09:05 | ORD 15:15, 4 Aug | $300 + $180 hotel |
| R6105 | Elena Fox (no tier, basic economy) | AA204, 3 Aug, 09:05 | ORD 15:15, 3 Aug | none |
- Why only two people moved up a cabin: Iris and Lea are the only two who meet the rule: gold or platinum, travelling alone on a single flight, with their own cabin full on a flight that lands sooner than anything still open in that cabin. Ben, also gold, couldn't be moved up. Iris had already taken the last premium economy seat on UA88, and AA204 had none.
- Boston connections: the new first leg broke Dev's and Mo's AA1402 connection, so I rebooked their onward leg as well. That leaves them overnight at O'Hare with a valid next-morning connection. No Boston flight on 3 Aug could be reached in time, and there are no direct San Francisco–Boston flights.
- Voucher records: I issued 10 vouchers (V1–V10), each as its own record. A search of today's ledger returns no entries, so the vouchers apparently aren't logged as ledger entries. I confirmed each one from the voucher tool's own response instead.
All 13 messages (N1–N13) were delivered. Each gives the new flights and cabin, says the change was free, and lists any vouchers or explains why none apply. I didn't touch any other bookings or queue requests.
One oddity: the flight date (3 Aug 2026) is before today (6 Oct 2026). I went ahead as instructed, since the system accepted every rebooking.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.