RunOpus 5.5repeat 1
Plan-execute on Redirect the order that has not shipped
claude-opus-5-5__plan-execute__ecommerce-easy__r1
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.085
- Latency
- 24.9s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 10
- Tool calls
- 7
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 32k / 1.9k
- 24,055 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 9.0s | $0.025 | 2 | 0 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Execute | 15.8s | $0.060 | 8 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks ecommerce-easy --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passThe order that has not shipped carries the new address1.00weight 0.43
O-1001 address: 7 Quarry Rise, Sheffield S11 8XZ, UK
- passThe edit did not spill onto the order already in transit1.00weight 0.29
- passLooked up which order was still open before editing one1.00weight 0.14
- passChecked the state of the order already in transit1.00weight 0.14
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 7
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 4
Final answer
I put Dana Whitfield's new address on order O-1001, which hasn't shipped. Order O-1002, which is in transit, still has its original address.
- O-1001 (not shipped): Both items (L1, a P-KEY; L2, two P-CAB) were still pending, so I changed the shipping address from "12 Alder Lane, Bristol BS1 4TR, UK" to "7 Quarry Rise, Sheffield S11 8XZ, UK". I checked the order afterwards: the new address saved exactly as entered, and the status, items and £167.00 paid are unchanged.
- O-1002 (in transit): Its one item (a P-MON) shipped on 2026-07-07. I didn't touch it, and I checked afterwards that its address is still "88 Old Mill Road, Bristol BS3 2QQ, UK". Our policy doesn't allow changing the address on an order that has already shipped.
I made no other changes to her customer profile or any other order.
Differences from the plan:
- The plan spelled the country as "United Kingdom", but I used "UK" because that's how you gave it and how her other addresses are written.
- The address field is a single line of text, not separate fields.
Worth noting: The two orders had different old addresses (Alder Lane and Old Mill Road). The O-1002 parcel is going to Old Mill Road, not the new house. If she no longer has access to that address, she'll need to arrange collection or a redirect with the carrier, or return the item once it arrives. We can't change it on our side.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.