RunOpus 5.5repeat 2
Plan-execute on Redirect the order that has not shipped
claude-opus-5-5__plan-execute__ecommerce-easy__r2
Score
1.000
- Cost
- $0.083
- Latency
- 23.7s
- setup 0.0s, grading 0.0s
- Turns
- 10
- Tool calls
- 7
- Subagents
- 0
- Tokens in / out
- 32k / 1.8k
- 24,358 read from cache
Did the design run?
- Run completed: heldharness.run-completedThe environment was built, the architecture returned and grading finished, none of them throwing.
- No API failures: heldharness.apiNo model call failed at the API.
- Every call ended: heldharness.calls-endedEvery call ended with a result, or was stopped by the run's own limits.
- No harness tool denied: heldharness.harness-toolsThe sandbox guard never denied a harness tool, nor a tool the session itself offered.
- Tool servers connected: heldharness.mcp-connectedEvery tool server the harness gave a call was connected when the session started.
- No foreign tool servers: heldharness.mcp-hermeticNo call loaded a tool server the harness did not give it.
- Builtin tools: heldharness.builtin-toolsA check recorded with the run.
- Structured replies arrived: heldharness.structured-outputEvery call that asked for structured output and ran to the end got it.
- No silent fallbacks: heldharness.not-degradedNo phase fell back on a default (an empty plan, a default winner) instead of its output.
- The plan was a plan: heldplan-execute.planThe planner’s reply was read through its schema and held at least one step.
- Each call was shown the right tools: heldplan-execute.toolsThe planner was shown no tools and the executor the task’s full toolset.
Phases
Drawn from the phase records: timing and cost per call, no tool calls or messages.
| Phase | Duration | Cost | Turns | Tools | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | 10.0s | $0.027 | 2 | 0 | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Execute | 13.7s | $0.055 | 8 | 7 | claude-opus-5-5 |
The call-by-call replay is not published for this run. Traces are large, so the repository keeps 9 of this run set’s 900 and leaves the rest out; the score, phases and final answer on this page come from the committed run record.
Runs you can replay
- A gate that blocked the right moveGated-execute · Haiku 4.5
- Three proposals beat one agentPropose-select · Haiku 4.5
- A verifier that earned its keepPlan-execute-verify · Sonnet 5.5
- A revision that did not helpPlan-execute-verify · Haiku 4.5
- The control, missing a stepSingle · Haiku 4.5
Record this cell yourself: npm run bench -- run --strategies plan-execute --tasks ecommerce-easy --models claude-opus-5-5 --repeats 1
Score breakdown
- passThe order that has not shipped carries the new address1.00weight 0.43
O-1001 address: 7 Quarry Rise, Sheffield S11 8XZ, UK
- passThe edit did not spill onto the order already in transit1.00weight 0.29
- passLooked up which order was still open before editing one1.00weight 0.14
- passChecked the state of the order already in transit1.00weight 0.14
Penalties
No penalties were applied.
Scorer metadata
- tool calls
- 7
- failed tool calls
- 0
- distinct tools
- 4
Final answer
I've put Dana Whitfield's (C-100) new address on her unshipped order, O-1001. Her in-transit order, O-1002, was not affected.
- O-1001 (not shipped yet): The address changed from "12 Alder Lane, Bristol BS1 4TR, UK" to "7 Quarry Rise, Sheffield S11 8XZ, UK". Neither of its lines had shipped before I changed it. I re-read the order afterwards: the new address is there, and the order and both lines (L1 keyboard, L2 cables ×2) are still pending. Nothing else changed.
- O-1002 (in transit): Its only line shipped on 2026-07-07, so store policy doesn't allow changing its address. I re-read it after the update: it is still marked shipped, and the address is still "88 Old Mill Road, Bristol BS3 2QQ, UK", the same as before.
The two orders had different old addresses, so 12 Alder Lane may not have been her most recent one. The parcel for O-1002 is going to 88 Old Mill Road, and she may need to collect it there or ask the carrier to redirect it.
I didn't change her customer profile, refunds, stock or dispatch, because you didn't ask for that.
Provenance of the numbers on this page
- run set
- scaffold-or-scale-v1
- models
- Haiku 4.5, Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5
- effort
- high
- repeats
- 2
- fixtures
- replay
- runs
- 900 / 900
- strategy cost
- $354.44
- judge cost
- $9.19
- wall clock
- 9h 48m
- git
- fce5807b2d
Cost excludes judge calls, which are tracked separately so a scoring model never flatters or penalises an architecture. Every figure on this site is read from results/ at build time.